Seek Returns logo

GFS vs. MCHP: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GFS and MCHP, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolGFSMCHP
Company NameGlobalFoundries Inc.Microchip Technology Incorporated
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustrySemiconductors & Semiconductor EquipmentSemiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment
Market Capitalization18.33 billion USD36.03 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateOctober 28, 2021March 19, 1993
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GFS and MCHP by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GFS vs. MCHP: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGFSMCHP
5-Day Price Return-0.24%1.17%
13-Week Price Return-15.61%10.22%
26-Week Price Return-22.89%23.04%
52-Week Price Return-28.67%-18.62%
Month-to-Date Return-11.69%-1.23%
Year-to-Date Return-23.05%16.41%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.97M10.00M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.89M9.71M
3-Month Volatility37.41%39.36%
Beta1.531.57

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GFS

-1.03%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
52.74%
Q3
23.49%
Median
11.60%
Q1
3.23%
Min
-20.69%

GFS has a negative Return on Equity of -1.03%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

MCHP

-0.01%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
52.74%
Q3
23.49%
Median
11.60%
Q1
3.23%
Min
-20.69%

MCHP has a negative Return on Equity of -0.01%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

GFS vs. MCHP: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GFS

-1.68%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
44.17%
Q3
22.38%
Median
11.95%
Q1
3.21%
Min
-25.16%

GFS has a negative Net Profit Margin of -1.68%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

MCHP

-0.01%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
44.17%
Q3
22.38%
Median
11.95%
Q1
3.21%
Min
-25.16%

MCHP has a negative Net Profit Margin of -0.01%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

GFS vs. MCHP: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GFS

-2.47%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
58.03%
Q3
27.84%
Median
12.45%
Q1
5.15%
Min
-28.61%

GFS has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -2.47%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

MCHP

6.69%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
58.03%
Q3
27.84%
Median
12.45%
Q1
5.15%
Min
-28.61%

MCHP’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.69% is around the midpoint for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

GFS vs. MCHP: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGFSMCHP
Return on Equity (TTM)-1.03%-0.01%
Return on Assets (TTM)-0.67%0.00%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-1.68%-0.01%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-2.47%6.69%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)23.76%56.07%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GFS

2.63

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
8.42
Q3
4.70
Median
2.75
Q1
2.07
Min
1.04

GFS’s Current Ratio of 2.63 aligns with the median group of the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MCHP

2.59

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
8.42
Q3
4.70
Median
2.75
Q1
2.07
Min
1.04

MCHP’s Current Ratio of 2.59 aligns with the median group of the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

GFS vs. MCHP: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GFS

0.15

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.45
Median
0.22
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

GFS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.15 is typical for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MCHP

0.80

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.45
Median
0.22
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

MCHP’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.80. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

GFS vs. MCHP: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GFS

29.37

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
174.00
Q3
81.10
Median
27.22
Q1
7.28
Min
-4.26

GFS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 29.37 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MCHP

1.16

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
174.00
Q3
81.10
Median
27.22
Q1
7.28
Min
-4.26

In the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, MCHP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.16 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

GFS vs. MCHP: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGFSMCHP
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.632.59
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.921.47
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.150.80
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)29.371.16

Growth

Revenue Growth

GFS vs. MCHP: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GFS vs. MCHP: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GFS

0.00%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
4.16%
Q3
1.78%
Median
0.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GFS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

MCHP

2.77%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
4.16%
Q3
1.78%
Median
0.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.77%, MCHP offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

GFS vs. MCHP: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GFS

0.00%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
196.12%
Q3
87.72%
Median
26.57%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GFS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

MCHP

123.62%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
196.12%
Q3
87.72%
Median
26.57%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MCHP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 123.62% is in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

GFS vs. MCHP: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGFSMCHP
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%2.77%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%123.62%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GFS

--

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
109.37
Q3
57.11
Median
28.95
Q1
22.13
Min
11.14

P/E Ratio data for GFS is currently unavailable.

MCHP

--

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
109.37
Q3
57.11
Median
28.95
Q1
22.13
Min
11.14

P/E Ratio data for MCHP is currently unavailable.

GFS vs. MCHP: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GFS

2.67

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
16.09
Q3
10.10
Median
4.82
Q1
2.60
Min
0.93

GFS’s P/S Ratio of 2.67 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MCHP

8.02

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
16.09
Q3
10.10
Median
4.82
Q1
2.60
Min
0.93

MCHP’s P/S Ratio of 8.02 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

GFS vs. MCHP: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GFS

1.86

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
13.56
Q3
6.75
Median
3.68
Q1
1.89
Min
0.60

GFS’s P/B Ratio of 1.86 is in the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

MCHP

3.68

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
13.56
Q3
6.75
Median
3.68
Q1
1.89
Min
0.60

MCHP’s P/B Ratio of 3.68 is within the conventional range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

GFS vs. MCHP: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGFSMCHP
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)----
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.678.02
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.863.68
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)18.7845.70