Seek Returns logo

GFL vs. VRSK: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GFL and VRSK, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolGFLVRSK
Company NameGFL Environmental Inc.Verisk Analytics, Inc.
CountryCanadaUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryCommercial Services & SuppliesProfessional Services
Market Capitalization16.68 billion USD34.02 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateMarch 3, 2020October 7, 2009
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GFL and VRSK by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GFL vs. VRSK: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGFLVRSK
5-Day Price Return-2.31%-1.60%
13-Week Price Return-3.11%-19.83%
26-Week Price Return-8.29%-20.19%
52-Week Price Return16.70%-8.45%
Month-to-Date Return-3.68%-3.19%
Year-to-Date Return-0.86%-11.60%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.36M1.18M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.44M1.07M
3-Month Volatility20.56%21.22%
Beta0.450.83

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GFL

48.97%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
31.93%
Q3
16.86%
Median
10.28%
Q1
6.63%
Min
0.71%

GFL’s Return on Equity of 48.97% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

VRSK

439.17%

Professional Services Industry

Max
68.01%
Q3
35.32%
Median
21.92%
Q1
11.67%
Min
-20.25%

VRSK’s Return on Equity of 439.17% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Professional Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

GFL vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GFL

49.85%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
16.98%
Q3
9.05%
Median
5.35%
Q1
3.42%
Min
-2.31%

GFL’s Net Profit Margin of 49.85% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

VRSK

30.67%

Professional Services Industry

Max
31.75%
Q3
15.50%
Median
8.95%
Q1
4.51%
Min
0.35%

A Net Profit Margin of 30.67% places VRSK in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

GFL vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GFL

5.83%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
23.33%
Q3
12.51%
Median
8.33%
Q1
4.45%
Min
-2.90%

GFL’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.83% is around the midpoint for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

VRSK

43.94%

Professional Services Industry

Max
30.62%
Q3
19.06%
Median
13.60%
Q1
8.60%
Min
-2.18%

VRSK’s Operating Profit Margin of 43.94% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Professional Services industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

GFL vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGFLVRSK
Return on Equity (TTM)48.97%439.17%
Return on Assets (TTM)18.18%19.55%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)49.85%30.67%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)5.83%43.94%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)20.03%69.39%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GFL

0.67

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.73
Q3
2.13
Median
1.31
Q1
0.91
Min
0.59

GFL’s Current Ratio of 0.67 falls into the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

VRSK

1.53

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.28
Q3
1.75
Median
1.34
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

VRSK’s Current Ratio of 1.53 aligns with the median group of the Professional Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

GFL vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GFL

0.94

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
2.24
Q3
1.14
Median
0.76
Q1
0.36
Min
0.00

GFL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.94 is typical for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

VRSK

10.43

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.93
Q3
1.45
Median
0.98
Q1
0.45
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 10.43, VRSK operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Professional Services industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

GFL vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GFL

-0.09

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
24.70
Q3
13.44
Median
9.06
Q1
3.42
Min
-10.97

GFL has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.09. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

VRSK

43.51

Professional Services Industry

Max
39.45
Q3
20.41
Median
11.64
Q1
5.46
Min
-1.21

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 43.51, VRSK demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Professional Services industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

GFL vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGFLVRSK
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.671.53
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.551.44
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.9410.43
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-0.0943.51

Growth

Revenue Growth

GFL vs. VRSK: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GFL vs. VRSK: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GFL

0.13%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.65%
Q3
2.43%
Median
1.58%
Q1
0.74%
Min
0.00%

GFL’s Dividend Yield of 0.13% is in the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

VRSK

0.70%

Professional Services Industry

Max
4.83%
Q3
2.44%
Median
1.52%
Q1
0.52%
Min
0.00%

VRSK’s Dividend Yield of 0.70% is consistent with its peers in the Professional Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

GFL vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GFL

0.61%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
137.88%
Q3
73.07%
Median
44.79%
Q1
27.66%
Min
0.00%

GFL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 0.61% is in the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

VRSK

25.76%

Professional Services Industry

Max
128.51%
Q3
69.03%
Median
47.00%
Q1
18.05%
Min
0.00%

VRSK’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 25.76% is within the typical range for the Professional Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

GFL vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGFLVRSK
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.13%0.70%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.61%25.76%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GFL

6.40

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
57.87
Q3
33.40
Median
23.56
Q1
15.28
Min
6.56

GFL’s P/E Ratio of 6.40 is below the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This may indicate that the stock is potentially undervalued, or it could reflect market concerns about the company’s future prospects.

VRSK

37.00

Professional Services Industry

Max
52.60
Q3
33.83
Median
24.95
Q1
17.59
Min
7.96

A P/E Ratio of 37.00 places VRSK in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

GFL vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GFL

3.19

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
4.84
Q3
2.58
Median
1.09
Q1
0.62
Min
0.06

GFL’s P/S Ratio of 3.19 is in the upper echelon for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

VRSK

11.35

Professional Services Industry

Max
8.27
Q3
4.40
Median
2.09
Q1
0.99
Min
0.17

With a P/S Ratio of 11.35, VRSK trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Professional Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

GFL vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GFL

3.27

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
6.40
Q3
3.97
Median
2.44
Q1
1.60
Min
0.40

GFL’s P/B Ratio of 3.27 is within the conventional range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

VRSK

139.79

Professional Services Industry

Max
18.75
Q3
9.53
Median
5.88
Q1
2.95
Min
0.59

At 139.79, VRSK’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Professional Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

GFL vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGFLVRSK
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)6.4037.00
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.1911.35
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.27139.79
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)69.7033.22