GFL vs. VRSK: GFL Environmental vs. Verisk Analytics Stock Comparison

November 11, 2026

How do GFL Environmental (GFL) and Verisk Analytics (VRSK) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

GFL Environmental (GFL) and Verisk Analytics (VRSK) both fall under the Commercial & Professional Services industry group, but GFL is classified in Commercial Services & Supplies while VRSK is classified in Professional Services.

Company profile comparison for GFL Environmental (GFL) and Verisk Analytics (VRSK)
Profile Item	GFL	VRSK
Name	GFL Environmental Inc.	Verisk Analytics, Inc.
Country/Region	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Industrials	Industrials
GICS Industry Group	Commercial & Professional Services	Commercial & Professional Services
GICS Industry	Commercial Services & Supplies	Professional Services
GICS Sub-Industry	Environmental & Facilities Services	Research & Consulting Services
Market Capitalization	16.72 billion USD	26.25 billion USD
Currency	USD	USD
Exchange	NYSE	Nasdaq
Listing Date	March 3, 2020	October 7, 2009
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

GFL

VRSK

GSPC

GFL Environmental (GFL) vs. Verisk Analytics (VRSK), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…

Trailing total returns for GFL Environmental (GFL) and Verisk Analytics (VRSK). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…

Calendar-year total returns for GFL Environmental (GFL) and Verisk Analytics (VRSK). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for GFL Environmental (GFL) and Verisk Analytics (VRSK)
Metric	GFL	VRSK
Total Return (1Y)	7.30%	-4.66%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)	17.51%	-4.19%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)	3.62%	-0.60%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

GFL

VRSK

GSPC

GFL Environmental (GFL) vs. Verisk Analytics (VRSK), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…

Distribution of monthly total returns for GFL Environmental (GFL) and Verisk Analytics (VRSK). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for GFL Environmental (GFL) and Verisk Analytics (VRSK)
Metric	GFL	VRSK
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)	29.80%	36.08%
Beta (5Y)	0.66	0.65
Max Drawdown (5Y)	-42.75%	-50.81%
Avg. Volume (3M)	3.45M	1.25M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

GFL and VRSK are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for GFL Environmental (GFL) and Verisk Analytics (VRSK)
Metric	GFL	VRSK
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)	0.10	-0.25
Sortino Ratio (1Y)	0.15	-0.35

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Verisk Analytics (VRSK) has no ROE value reported for this period; GFL Environmental (GFL) reports a negative figure of -2.97%, which needs context because negative ROE can reflect losses or negative shareholders’ equity.

GFL

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

-2.97%

Max: 47.06%
Q3: 25.43%
Median: 14.11%
Q1: 3.92%
GFL: -2.97%
Min: -20.15%

VRSK

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

Max: 47.06%
Q3: 25.43%
Median: 14.11%
Q1: 3.92%
Min: -20.15%
VRSK: --

GFL Environmental (GFL) vs. Verisk Analytics (VRSK): VRSK does not report ROE, so it has no value marker; GFL is benchmarked against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group.

Net Margin (TTM)

GFL Environmental (GFL) reports a negative net margin of -4.28%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Verisk Analytics (VRSK) reports 27.68%, ranking against industry peers normally.

GFL

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

-4.28%

Max: 23.28%
Q3: 11.35%
Median: 5.65%
Q1: 0.87%
GFL: -4.28%
Min: -8.60%

VRSK

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

27.68%

VRSK: 27.68%
Max: 23.28%
Q3: 11.35%
Median: 5.65%
Q1: 0.87%
Min: -8.60%

GFL Environmental (GFL) vs. Verisk Analytics (VRSK): A comparison of their net margin against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Verisk Analytics (VRSK) at 45.16% turns sales into operating profit above its industry’s benchmark range, while GFL Environmental (GFL) at 9.44% operates around its industry’s norm.

GFL

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

9.44%

Max: 38.50%
Q3: 18.84%
Median: 10.40%
GFL: 9.44%
Q1: 5.59%
Min: -12.00%

VRSK

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

45.16%

VRSK: 45.16%
Max: 38.50%
Q3: 18.84%
Median: 10.40%
Q1: 5.59%
Min: -12.00%

GFL Environmental (GFL) vs. Verisk Analytics (VRSK): A comparison of their operating margin against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for GFL Environmental (GFL) and Verisk Analytics (VRSK)
Metric	GFL	VRSK
ROE (TTM)	-2.97%	--
ROA (TTM)	1.11%	16.56%
Net Margin (TTM)	-4.28%	27.68%
Operating Margin (TTM)	9.44%	45.16%
Gross Margin (TTM)	19.78%	70.17%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Both GFL Environmental (GFL) at 7.77% and Verisk Analytics (VRSK) at 6.63% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

GFL Environmental (GFL) vs. Verisk Analytics (VRSK): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Only one side can be read here: Verisk Analytics (VRSK) reports EPS growth of -3.43%, ranked against its industry; GFL Environmental (GFL) has no EPS growth figure this period.

GFL Environmental (GFL) vs. Verisk Analytics (VRSK): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for GFL Environmental (GFL) and Verisk Analytics (VRSK)
Metric	GFL	VRSK
Revenue Growth (YoY)	7.77%	6.63%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)	-0.72%	7.16%
EPS Growth (YoY)	--	-3.43%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)	--	2.60%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Both GFL Environmental (GFL) at 0.93 and Verisk Analytics (VRSK) at 1.07 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.

GFL

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

0.93

Max: 3.63
Q3: 2.14
Median: 1.55
Q1: 1.09
GFL: 0.93
Min: 0.45

VRSK

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

1.07

Max: 3.63
Q3: 2.14
Median: 1.55
Q1: 1.09
VRSK: 1.07
Min: 0.45

GFL Environmental (GFL) vs. Verisk Analytics (VRSK): A comparison of their current ratio against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Only one side’s leverage can be read here: GFL Environmental (GFL) carries debt-to-equity ratio of 1.04 against its industry range, while Verisk Analytics (VRSK) reports no figure this period.

GFL

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

1.04

Max: 2.37
Q3: 1.25
GFL: 1.04
Median: 0.88
Q1: 0.35
Min: 0.00

VRSK

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

Max: 2.37
Q3: 1.25
Median: 0.88
Q1: 0.35
Min: 0.00
VRSK: --

GFL Environmental (GFL) vs. Verisk Analytics (VRSK): VRSK does not report debt-to-equity ratio, so it has no value marker; GFL is benchmarked against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for GFL Environmental (GFL) and Verisk Analytics (VRSK)
Metric	GFL	VRSK
Current Ratio (MRQ)	0.93	1.07
Debt / Equity (MRQ)	1.04	--
Net Debt / EBITDA	6.75	2.65

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both GFL Environmental (GFL) at 0.14% and Verisk Analytics (VRSK) at 0.92% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

GFL

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

0.14%

Max: 4.33%
Q3: 1.80%
Median: 0.60%
GFL: 0.14%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

VRSK

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

0.92%

Max: 4.33%
Q3: 1.80%
VRSK: 0.92%
Median: 0.60%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

GFL Environmental (GFL) vs. Verisk Analytics (VRSK): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Both GFL Environmental (GFL) at 19.07% and Verisk Analytics (VRSK) at 29.55% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

GFL

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

19.07%

Max: 99.58%
Q3: 41.99%
GFL: 19.07%
Median: 17.27%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: -17.94%

VRSK

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

29.55%

Max: 99.58%
Q3: 41.99%
VRSK: 29.55%
Median: 17.27%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: -17.94%

GFL Environmental (GFL) vs. Verisk Analytics (VRSK): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for GFL Environmental (GFL) and Verisk Analytics (VRSK)
Metric	GFL	VRSK
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.14%	0.92%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	19.07%	29.55%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

An earnings multiple is available for just one side: Verisk Analytics (VRSK) trades at 31.00 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while GFL Environmental (GFL) has no P/E ratio this period.

GFL

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

Max: 49.47
Q3: 33.76
Median: 24.16
Q1: 16.01
Min: 1.89
GFL: --

VRSK

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

31.00

Max: 49.47
Q3: 33.76
VRSK: 31.00
Median: 24.16
Q1: 16.01
Min: 1.89

GFL Environmental (GFL) vs. Verisk Analytics (VRSK): GFL does not report P/E ratio, so it has no value marker; VRSK is benchmarked against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

GFL Environmental (GFL) at 2.25 prices around its industry’s typical P/S ratio, while Verisk Analytics (VRSK) at 8.26 clears its benchmark range — VRSK looks notably rich on sales.

GFL

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

2.25

Max: 7.17
Q3: 3.35
GFL: 2.25
Median: 1.33
Q1: 0.69
Min: 0.11

VRSK

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

8.26

VRSK: 8.26
Max: 7.17
Q3: 3.35
Median: 1.33
Q1: 0.69
Min: 0.11

GFL Environmental (GFL) vs. Verisk Analytics (VRSK): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Verisk Analytics (VRSK) reports a negative P/B ratio of -23.56, meaning negative book equity — the multiple itself is not meaningful for valuation. Meanwhile GFL Environmental (GFL) reports 2.42, ranking against industry peers normally.

GFL

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

2.42

Max: 11.25
Q3: 6.08
Median: 2.92
GFL: 2.42
Q1: 1.55
Min: -2.78

VRSK

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

-23.56

Max: 11.25
Q3: 6.08
Median: 2.92
Q1: 1.55
Min: -2.78
VRSK: -23.56

GFL Environmental (GFL) vs. Verisk Analytics (VRSK): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for GFL Environmental (GFL) and Verisk Analytics (VRSK)
Metric	GFL	VRSK
P/E Ratio (TTM)	--	31.00
P/S Ratio (TTM)	2.25	8.26
P/B Ratio (MRQ)	2.42	-23.56
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)	1.55%	3.57%