Seek Returns

GFL vs. RTO: GFL Environmental vs. Rentokil Initial Stock Comparison

How do GFL Environmental (GFL) and Rentokil Initial (RTO) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

GFL Environmental (GFL) and Rentokil Initial (RTO) are both classified in the Environmental & Facilities Services sub-industry within the broader Commercial Services & Supplies industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

Rentokil Initial (RTO) has more than two decades of public-market history since November 18, 1996, whereas GFL Environmental (GFL) listed on March 3, 2020 and has a much shorter record to draw on.

GFL Environmental (GFL) trades as ordinary local shares, while Rentokil Initial (RTO) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Company profile comparison for GFL Environmental (GFL) and Rentokil Initial (RTO)
Profile ItemGFLRTO
NameGFL Environmental Inc.Rentokil Initial plc American Depositary Shares (each representing five Ordinary Shares)
Country/RegionUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS Industry GroupCommercial & Professional ServicesCommercial & Professional Services
GICS IndustryCommercial Services & SuppliesCommercial Services & Supplies
GICS Sub-IndustryEnvironmental & Facilities ServicesEnvironmental & Facilities Services
Market Capitalization16.72 billion USD11.87 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 3, 2020November 18, 1996
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

GFL
RTO
GSPC
Loading price history…
GFL Environmental (GFL) vs. Rentokil Initial (RTO), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for GFL Environmental (GFL) and Rentokil Initial (RTO). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for GFL Environmental (GFL) and Rentokil Initial (RTO). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for GFL Environmental (GFL) and Rentokil Initial (RTO)
MetricGFLRTO
Total Return (1Y)7.30%-10.02%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)17.51%-1.88%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)3.62%-8.85%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

GFL
RTO
GSPC
Loading price history…
GFL Environmental (GFL) vs. Rentokil Initial (RTO), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for GFL Environmental (GFL) and Rentokil Initial (RTO). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for GFL Environmental (GFL) and Rentokil Initial (RTO)
MetricGFLRTO
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)29.80%33.85%
Beta (5Y)0.660.98
Max Drawdown (5Y)-42.75%-50.93%
Avg. Volume (3M)3.45M1.74M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
GFL and RTO are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for GFL Environmental (GFL) and Rentokil Initial (RTO)
MetricGFLRTO
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)0.10-0.42
Sortino Ratio (1Y)0.15-0.57

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

GFL Environmental (GFL) reports a negative ROE of -2.97%; negative ROE can reflect losses or negative shareholders’ equity, so it is harder to read as capital efficiency. Meanwhile Rentokil Initial (RTO) reports 5.97%, ranking against industry peers normally.

GFL

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

-2.97%

Max
47.06%
Q3
25.43%
Median
14.11%
Q1
3.92%
GFL
-2.97%
Min
-20.15%

RTO

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

5.97%

Max
47.06%
Q3
25.43%
Median
14.11%
RTO
5.97%
Q1
3.92%
Min
-20.15%
Loading chart…
GFL Environmental (GFL) vs. Rentokil Initial (RTO): A comparison of their ROE against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

GFL Environmental (GFL) reports a negative net margin of -4.28%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Rentokil Initial (RTO) reports 6.70%, ranking against industry peers normally.

GFL

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

-4.28%

Max
23.28%
Q3
11.35%
Median
5.65%
Q1
0.87%
GFL
-4.28%
Min
-8.60%

RTO

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

6.70%

Max
23.28%
Q3
11.35%
RTO
6.70%
Median
5.65%
Q1
0.87%
Min
-8.60%
Loading chart…
GFL Environmental (GFL) vs. Rentokil Initial (RTO): A comparison of their net margin against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both GFL Environmental (GFL) at 9.44% and Rentokil Initial (RTO) at 12.79% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

GFL

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

9.44%

Max
38.50%
Q3
18.84%
Median
10.40%
GFL
9.44%
Q1
5.59%
Min
-12.00%

RTO

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

12.79%

Max
38.50%
Q3
18.84%
RTO
12.79%
Median
10.40%
Q1
5.59%
Min
-12.00%
Loading chart…
GFL Environmental (GFL) vs. Rentokil Initial (RTO): A comparison of their operating margin against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for GFL Environmental (GFL) and Rentokil Initial (RTO)
MetricGFLRTO
ROE (TTM)-2.97%5.97%
ROA (TTM)1.11%4.00%
Net Margin (TTM)-4.28%6.70%
Operating Margin (TTM)9.44%12.79%
Gross Margin (TTM)19.78%14.01%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Both GFL Environmental (GFL) at 7.77% and Rentokil Initial (RTO) at 4.40% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Loading chart…
GFL Environmental (GFL) vs. Rentokil Initial (RTO): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Only one side can be read here: Rentokil Initial (RTO) reports EPS growth of 21.70%, ranked against its industry; GFL Environmental (GFL) has no EPS growth figure this period.

Loading chart…
GFL Environmental (GFL) vs. Rentokil Initial (RTO): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for GFL Environmental (GFL) and Rentokil Initial (RTO)
MetricGFLRTO
Revenue Growth (YoY)7.77%4.40%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)-0.72%15.40%
EPS Growth (YoY)--21.70%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)--10.00%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Both GFL Environmental (GFL) at 0.93 and Rentokil Initial (RTO) at 1.06 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.

GFL

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

0.93

Max
3.63
Q3
2.14
Median
1.55
Q1
1.09
GFL
0.93
Min
0.45

RTO

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

1.06

Max
3.63
Q3
2.14
Median
1.55
Q1
1.09
RTO
1.06
Min
0.45
Loading chart…
GFL Environmental (GFL) vs. Rentokil Initial (RTO): A comparison of their current ratio against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Both GFL Environmental (GFL) at 1.04 and Rentokil Initial (RTO) at 1.11 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.

GFL

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

1.04

Max
2.37
Q3
1.25
GFL
1.04
Median
0.88
Q1
0.35
Min
0.00

RTO

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

1.11

Max
2.37
Q3
1.25
RTO
1.11
Median
0.88
Q1
0.35
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
GFL Environmental (GFL) vs. Rentokil Initial (RTO): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for GFL Environmental (GFL) and Rentokil Initial (RTO)
MetricGFLRTO
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.931.06
Debt / Equity (MRQ)1.041.11
Net Debt / EBITDA6.752.93

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both GFL Environmental (GFL) at 0.14% and Rentokil Initial (RTO) at 0.53% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

GFL

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

0.14%

Max
4.33%
Q3
1.80%
Median
0.60%
GFL
0.14%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

RTO

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

0.53%

Max
4.33%
Q3
1.80%
Median
0.60%
RTO
0.53%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
GFL Environmental (GFL) vs. Rentokil Initial (RTO): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GFL Environmental (GFL) at 19.07% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Rentokil Initial (RTO) at 97.56% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.

GFL

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

19.07%

Max
99.58%
Q3
41.99%
GFL
19.07%
Median
17.27%
Q1
0.00%
Min
-17.94%

RTO

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

97.56%

Max
99.58%
RTO
97.56%
Q3
41.99%
Median
17.27%
Q1
0.00%
Min
-17.94%
Loading chart…
GFL Environmental (GFL) vs. Rentokil Initial (RTO): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for GFL Environmental (GFL) and Rentokil Initial (RTO)
MetricGFLRTO
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.14%0.53%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)19.07%97.56%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

An earnings multiple is available for just one side: Rentokil Initial (RTO) trades at 37.48 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while GFL Environmental (GFL) has no P/E ratio this period.

GFL

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

--

Max
49.47
Q3
33.76
Median
24.16
Q1
16.01
Min
1.89
GFL
--

RTO

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

37.48

Max
49.47
RTO
37.48
Q3
33.76
Median
24.16
Q1
16.01
Min
1.89
Loading chart…
GFL Environmental (GFL) vs. Rentokil Initial (RTO): GFL does not report P/E ratio, so it has no value marker; RTO is benchmarked against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

On P/S ratio, both GFL Environmental (GFL) at 2.25 and Rentokil Initial (RTO) at 1.66 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.

GFL

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

2.25

Max
7.17
Q3
3.35
GFL
2.25
Median
1.33
Q1
0.69
Min
0.11

RTO

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

1.66

Max
7.17
Q3
3.35
RTO
1.66
Median
1.33
Q1
0.69
Min
0.11
Loading chart…
GFL Environmental (GFL) vs. Rentokil Initial (RTO): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

On P/B ratio, both GFL Environmental (GFL) at 2.42 and Rentokil Initial (RTO) at 2.16 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.

GFL

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

2.42

Max
11.25
Q3
6.08
Median
2.92
GFL
2.42
Q1
1.55
Min
-2.78

RTO

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

2.16

Max
11.25
Q3
6.08
Median
2.92
RTO
2.16
Q1
1.55
Min
-2.78
Loading chart…
GFL Environmental (GFL) vs. Rentokil Initial (RTO): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for GFL Environmental (GFL) and Rentokil Initial (RTO)
MetricGFLRTO
P/E Ratio (TTM)--37.48
P/S Ratio (TTM)2.251.66
P/B Ratio (MRQ)2.422.16
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)1.55%8.85%