GFI vs. WPM: Gold Fields vs. Wheaton Precious Metals Stock Comparison
How do Gold Fields (GFI) and Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Gold Fields (GFI) and Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) are both classified in the Gold sub-industry within the broader Metals & Mining industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.
Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) trades as ordinary local shares, while Gold Fields (GFI) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.
| Profile Item | GFI | WPM |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Gold Fields Ltd. Sponsored ADR | Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. |
| Country/Region | South Africa | Canada |
| GICS Sector | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry Group | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry | Metals & Mining | Metals & Mining |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Gold | Gold |
| Market Capitalization | 34.65 billion USD | 61.91 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | March 17, 1980 | July 6, 2005 |
| Security Type | ADR | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | GFI | WPM |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 9.54% | 45.35% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 51.07% | 50.60% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 38.08% | 29.06% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | GFI | WPM |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 60.41% | 52.11% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.64 | 0.49 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -56.22% | -43.29% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 3.78M | 2.01M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | GFI | WPM |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.09 | 0.79 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 0.12 | 1.14 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both companies show strong equity returns, but Gold Fields (GFI) at 58.68% is the standout with ROE above its industry range; Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) at 23.10% also sits in the top quartile.
GFI
Materials industry group
58.68%
- GFI
- 58.68%
- Max
- 52.88%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
WPM
Materials industry group
23.10%
- Max
- 52.88%
- WPM
- 23.10%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
Net Margin (TTM)
Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) at 60.39% keeps the most of each sales dollar — above its industry’s net margin range — and Gold Fields (GFI) at 38.66% also retains a top-quartile share.
GFI
Materials industry group
38.66%
- GFI
- 38.66%
- Max
- 38.66%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
WPM
Materials industry group
60.39%
- WPM
- 60.39%
- Max
- 38.66%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Gold Fields (GFI) at 55.00% and Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) at 66.70% convert sales into operating profit at a top-quartile rate, pointing to tighter cost discipline before financing and tax.
GFI
Materials industry group
55.00%
- Max
- 66.70%
- GFI
- 55.00%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- Median
- 12.56%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
WPM
Materials industry group
66.70%
- WPM
- 66.70%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- Median
- 12.56%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | GFI | WPM |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 58.68% | 23.10% |
| ROA (TTM) | 28.52% | 15.22% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 38.66% | 60.39% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 55.00% | 66.70% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 57.77% | 86.61% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Gold Fields (GFI) at 68.24% and Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) at 80.18% sit in the top peer quartile for revenue growth, so each is growing its top line faster than typical industry peers.
EPS Growth
Both Gold Fields (GFI) at 185.51% and Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) at 177.85% sit in the top peer quartile for EPS growth, so each is compounding per-share earnings faster than typical industry peers.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | GFI | WPM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 68.24% | 80.18% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 26.86% | 29.53% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 185.51% | 177.85% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 71.58% | 29.83% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Gold Fields (GFI) at 1.87 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) at 0.57 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for WPM.
GFI
Materials industry group
1.87
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- Median
- 2.24
- GFI
- 1.87
- Q1
- 1.45
- Min
- 0.16
WPM
Materials industry group
0.57
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- WPM
- 0.57
- Min
- 0.16
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both Gold Fields (GFI) at 0.29 and Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) at 0.16 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
GFI
Materials industry group
0.29
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- GFI
- 0.29
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
WPM
Materials industry group
0.16
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- WPM
- 0.16
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | GFI | WPM |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.87 | 0.57 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.29 | 0.16 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.06 | 0.50 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) at 0.57% pays an industry-typical yield; Gold Fields (GFI) at 5.65% is above its entire peer range — the higher number, but one that calls for a look at payout sustainability before treating it as an advantage.
GFI
Materials industry group
5.65%
- GFI
- 5.65%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
WPM
Materials industry group
0.57%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- WPM
- 0.57%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Gold Fields (GFI) at 31.81% and Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) at 16.29% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
GFI
Materials industry group
31.81%
- Max
- 83.62%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- GFI
- 31.81%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
WPM
Materials industry group
16.29%
- Max
- 83.62%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- WPM
- 16.29%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | GFI | WPM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 5.65% | 0.57% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 31.81% | 16.29% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Gold Fields (GFI) at 8.03 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) at 29.63 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for GFI, though growth and earnings durability still matter.
GFI
Materials industry group
8.03
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- GFI
- 8.03
- Min
- 3.93
WPM
Materials industry group
29.63
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- WPM
- 29.63
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Gold Fields (GFI) at 3.05 prices around its industry’s typical P/S ratio, while Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) at 17.86 clears its benchmark range — WPM looks notably rich on sales.
GFI
Materials industry group
3.05
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- GFI
- 3.05
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
WPM
Materials industry group
17.86
- WPM
- 17.86
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Both look rich against book: Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) at 6.17 sits in the upper P/B ratio quartile, and Gold Fields (GFI) at 7.78 prices even higher, above its industry range.
GFI
Materials industry group
7.78
- GFI
- 7.78
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
WPM
Materials industry group
6.17
- Max
- 6.59
- WPM
- 6.17
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | GFI | WPM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 8.03 | 29.63 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 3.05 | 17.86 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 7.78 | 6.17 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 12.05% | -5.11% |