GFI vs. NEM: Gold Fields vs. Newmont Stock Comparison

November 11, 2026

How do Gold Fields (GFI) and Newmont (NEM) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Gold Fields (GFI) and Newmont (NEM) are both classified in the Gold sub-industry within the broader Metals & Mining industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

Newmont (NEM) trades as ordinary local shares, while Gold Fields (GFI) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Company profile comparison for Gold Fields (GFI) and Newmont (NEM)
Profile Item	GFI	NEM
Name	Gold Fields Ltd. Sponsored ADR	Newmont Corporation
Country/Region	South Africa	United States
GICS Sector	Materials	Materials
GICS Industry Group	Materials	Materials
GICS Industry	Metals & Mining	Metals & Mining
GICS Sub-Industry	Gold	Gold
Market Capitalization	34.65 billion USD	125.65 billion USD
Currency	USD	USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	March 17, 1980	March 17, 1980
Security Type	ADR	Common Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

GFI

NEM

GSPC

Gold Fields (GFI) vs. Newmont (NEM), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…

Trailing total returns for Gold Fields (GFI) and Newmont (NEM). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…

Calendar-year total returns for Gold Fields (GFI) and Newmont (NEM). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Gold Fields (GFI) and Newmont (NEM)
Metric	GFI	NEM
Total Return (1Y)	9.54%	51.53%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)	51.07%	57.50%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)	38.08%	20.41%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

GFI

NEM

GSPC

Gold Fields (GFI) vs. Newmont (NEM), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…

Distribution of monthly total returns for Gold Fields (GFI) and Newmont (NEM). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Gold Fields (GFI) and Newmont (NEM)
Metric	GFI	NEM
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)	60.41%	48.55%
Beta (5Y)	0.64	0.51
Max Drawdown (5Y)	-56.22%	-62.40%
Avg. Volume (3M)	3.78M	6.95M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

GFI and NEM are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Gold Fields (GFI) and Newmont (NEM)
Metric	GFI	NEM
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)	0.09	0.97
Sortino Ratio (1Y)	0.12	1.41

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Both companies show strong equity returns, but Gold Fields (GFI) at 58.68% is the standout with ROE above its industry range; Newmont (NEM) at 27.26% also sits in the top quartile.

GFI

Materials industry group

58.68%

GFI: 58.68%
Max: 52.88%
Q3: 19.49%
Median: 8.76%
Q1: -3.41%
Min: -32.81%

NEM

Materials industry group

27.26%

Max: 52.88%
NEM: 27.26%
Q3: 19.49%
Median: 8.76%
Q1: -3.41%
Min: -32.81%

Gold Fields (GFI) vs. Newmont (NEM): A comparison of their ROE against the Materials industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

For every dollar of sales, both Gold Fields (GFI) at 38.66% and Newmont (NEM) at 34.73% retain more as net profit than most peers, landing in the top net margin quartile of their industries.

GFI

Materials industry group

38.66%

GFI: 38.66%
Max: 38.66%
Q3: 15.98%
Median: 5.28%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: -20.40%

NEM

Materials industry group

34.73%

Max: 38.66%
NEM: 34.73%
Q3: 15.98%
Median: 5.28%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: -20.40%

Gold Fields (GFI) vs. Newmont (NEM): A comparison of their net margin against the Materials industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both Gold Fields (GFI) at 55.00% and Newmont (NEM) at 49.99% convert sales into operating profit at a top-quartile rate, pointing to tighter cost discipline before financing and tax.

GFI

Materials industry group

55.00%

Max: 66.70%
GFI: 55.00%
Q3: 28.92%
Median: 12.56%
Q1: 3.28%
Min: -14.07%

NEM

Materials industry group

49.99%

Max: 66.70%
NEM: 49.99%
Q3: 28.92%
Median: 12.56%
Q1: 3.28%
Min: -14.07%

Gold Fields (GFI) vs. Newmont (NEM): A comparison of their operating margin against the Materials industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Gold Fields (GFI) and Newmont (NEM)
Metric	GFI	NEM
ROE (TTM)	58.68%	27.26%
ROA (TTM)	28.52%	16.37%
Net Margin (TTM)	38.66%	34.73%
Operating Margin (TTM)	55.00%	49.99%
Gross Margin (TTM)	57.77%	68.04%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Gold Fields (GFI) at 68.24% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Newmont (NEM) at 21.34% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for GFI.

Gold Fields (GFI) vs. Newmont (NEM): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Both Gold Fields (GFI) at 185.51% and Newmont (NEM) at 118.84% sit in the top peer quartile for EPS growth, so each is compounding per-share earnings faster than typical industry peers.

Gold Fields (GFI) vs. Newmont (NEM): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Gold Fields (GFI) and Newmont (NEM)
Metric	GFI	NEM
Revenue Growth (YoY)	68.24%	21.34%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)	26.86%	23.91%
EPS Growth (YoY)	185.51%	118.84%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)	71.58%	--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Both Gold Fields (GFI) at 1.87 and Newmont (NEM) at 2.45 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.

GFI

Materials industry group

1.87

Max: 5.96
Q3: 3.30
Median: 2.24
GFI: 1.87
Q1: 1.45
Min: 0.16

NEM

Materials industry group

2.45

Max: 5.96
Q3: 3.30
NEM: 2.45
Median: 2.24
Q1: 1.45
Min: 0.16

Gold Fields (GFI) vs. Newmont (NEM): A comparison of their current ratio against the Materials industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Both Gold Fields (GFI) at 0.29 and Newmont (NEM) at 0.16 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.

GFI

Materials industry group

0.29

Max: 1.98
Q3: 0.89
Median: 0.47
GFI: 0.29
Q1: 0.13
Min: 0.00

NEM

Materials industry group

0.16

Max: 1.98
Q3: 0.89
Median: 0.47
NEM: 0.16
Q1: 0.13
Min: 0.00

Gold Fields (GFI) vs. Newmont (NEM): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Materials industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Gold Fields (GFI) and Newmont (NEM)
Metric	GFI	NEM
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.87	2.45
Debt / Equity (MRQ)	0.29	0.16
Net Debt / EBITDA	0.06	-0.18

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Newmont (NEM) at 0.87% pays an industry-typical yield; Gold Fields (GFI) at 5.65% is above its entire peer range — the higher number, but one that calls for a look at payout sustainability before treating it as an advantage.

GFI

Materials industry group

5.65%

GFI: 5.65%
Max: 4.52%
Q3: 1.85%
Median: 0.38%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

NEM

Materials industry group

0.87%

Max: 4.52%
Q3: 1.85%
NEM: 0.87%
Median: 0.38%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

Gold Fields (GFI) vs. Newmont (NEM): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Materials industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Both Gold Fields (GFI) at 31.81% and Newmont (NEM) at 11.95% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

GFI

Materials industry group

31.81%

Max: 83.62%
Q3: 41.37%
GFI: 31.81%
Median: 9.54%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

NEM

Materials industry group

11.95%

Max: 83.62%
Q3: 41.37%
NEM: 11.95%
Median: 9.54%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

Gold Fields (GFI) vs. Newmont (NEM): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Materials industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Gold Fields (GFI) and Newmont (NEM)
Metric	GFI	NEM
Dividend Yield (TTM)	5.65%	0.87%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	31.81%	11.95%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Gold Fields (GFI) at 8.03 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Newmont (NEM) at 14.03 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for GFI, though growth and earnings durability still matter.

GFI

Materials industry group

8.03

Max: 59.00
Q3: 32.93
Median: 18.82
Q1: 11.96
GFI: 8.03
Min: 3.93

NEM

Materials industry group

14.03

Max: 59.00
Q3: 32.93
Median: 18.82
NEM: 14.03
Q1: 11.96
Min: 3.93

Gold Fields (GFI) vs. Newmont (NEM): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Materials industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Gold Fields (GFI) at 3.05 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Newmont (NEM) at 4.72 sits in the pricier quartile — NEM costs more per dollar of sales.

GFI

Materials industry group

3.05

Max: 9.62
Q3: 4.34
GFI: 3.05
Median: 1.87
Q1: 0.73
Min: 0.00

NEM

Materials industry group

4.72

Max: 9.62
NEM: 4.72
Q3: 4.34
Median: 1.87
Q1: 0.73
Min: 0.00

Gold Fields (GFI) vs. Newmont (NEM): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Materials industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Newmont (NEM) at 3.53 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Gold Fields (GFI) at 7.78 prices above its benchmark range — GFI looks rich relative to book.

GFI

Materials industry group

7.78

GFI: 7.78
Max: 6.59
Q3: 3.55
Median: 2.08
Q1: 1.26
Min: -0.17

NEM

Materials industry group

3.53

Max: 6.59
Q3: 3.55
NEM: 3.53
Median: 2.08
Q1: 1.26
Min: -0.17

Gold Fields (GFI) vs. Newmont (NEM): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Materials industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Gold Fields (GFI) and Newmont (NEM)
Metric	GFI	NEM
P/E Ratio (TTM)	8.03	14.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)	3.05	4.72
P/B Ratio (MRQ)	7.78	3.53
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)	12.05%	7.29%