GFI vs. MLM: Gold Fields vs. Martin Marietta Materials Stock Comparison
How do Gold Fields (GFI) and Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Gold Fields (GFI) and Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) both fall under the Materials industry group, but GFI is classified in Metals & Mining while MLM is classified in Construction Materials.
Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) trades as ordinary local shares, while Gold Fields (GFI) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.
| Profile Item | GFI | MLM |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Gold Fields Ltd. Sponsored ADR | Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. |
| Country/Region | South Africa | United States |
| GICS Sector | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry Group | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry | Metals & Mining | Construction Materials |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Gold | Construction Materials |
| Market Capitalization | 34.65 billion USD | 36.85 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | March 17, 1980 | February 17, 1994 |
| Security Type | ADR | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | GFI | MLM |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 9.54% | -12.23% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 51.07% | 6.32% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 38.08% | 5.43% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | GFI | MLM |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 60.41% | 29.72% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.64 | 1.02 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -56.22% | -33.19% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 3.78M | 805.11K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | GFI | MLM |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.09 | -0.56 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 0.12 | -0.75 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Gold Fields (GFI) at 58.68% clears its industry range for ROE, a sharper capital-efficiency signal than Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) at 6.02%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.
GFI
Materials industry group
58.68%
- GFI
- 58.68%
- Max
- 52.88%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
MLM
Materials industry group
6.02%
- Max
- 52.88%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- MLM
- 6.02%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
Net Margin (TTM)
For every dollar of sales, both Gold Fields (GFI) at 38.66% and Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) at 31.88% retain more as net profit than most peers, landing in the top net margin quartile of their industries.
GFI
Materials industry group
38.66%
- GFI
- 38.66%
- Max
- 38.66%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
MLM
Materials industry group
31.88%
- Max
- 38.66%
- MLM
- 31.88%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Gold Fields (GFI) at 55.00% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) at 22.29%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
GFI
Materials industry group
55.00%
- Max
- 66.70%
- GFI
- 55.00%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- Median
- 12.56%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
MLM
Materials industry group
22.29%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- MLM
- 22.29%
- Median
- 12.56%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | GFI | MLM |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 58.68% | 6.02% |
| ROA (TTM) | 28.52% | 3.27% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 38.66% | 31.88% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 55.00% | 22.29% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 57.77% | 26.74% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Gold Fields (GFI) at 68.24% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) at 8.62% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for GFI.
EPS Growth
Gold Fields (GFI) at 185.51% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) at -42.09% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for GFI.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | GFI | MLM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 68.24% | 8.62% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 26.86% | -0.06% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 185.51% | -42.09% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 71.58% | 10.61% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Gold Fields (GFI) at 1.87 and Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) at 1.63 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.
GFI
Materials industry group
1.87
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- Median
- 2.24
- GFI
- 1.87
- Q1
- 1.45
- Min
- 0.16
MLM
Materials industry group
1.63
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- Median
- 2.24
- MLM
- 1.63
- Q1
- 1.45
- Min
- 0.16
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both Gold Fields (GFI) at 0.29 and Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) at 0.75 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
GFI
Materials industry group
0.29
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- GFI
- 0.29
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
MLM
Materials industry group
0.75
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- MLM
- 0.75
- Median
- 0.47
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | GFI | MLM |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.87 | 1.63 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.29 | 0.75 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.06 | 5.88 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) at 0.63% pays an industry-typical yield; Gold Fields (GFI) at 5.65% is above its entire peer range — the higher number, but one that calls for a look at payout sustainability before treating it as an advantage.
GFI
Materials industry group
5.65%
- GFI
- 5.65%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
MLM
Materials industry group
0.63%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- MLM
- 0.63%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Gold Fields (GFI) at 31.81% and Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) at 24.85% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
GFI
Materials industry group
31.81%
- Max
- 83.62%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- GFI
- 31.81%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
MLM
Materials industry group
24.85%
- Max
- 83.62%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- MLM
- 24.85%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | GFI | MLM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 5.65% | 0.63% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 31.81% | 24.85% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Gold Fields (GFI) at 8.03 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) at 38.67 sits in the richer quartile — a clear split in what investors pay for each dollar of trailing earnings.
GFI
Materials industry group
8.03
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- GFI
- 8.03
- Min
- 3.93
MLM
Materials industry group
38.67
- Max
- 59.00
- MLM
- 38.67
- Q3
- 32.93
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Gold Fields (GFI) at 3.05 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) at 5.11 sits in the pricier quartile — MLM costs more per dollar of sales.
GFI
Materials industry group
3.05
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- GFI
- 3.05
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
MLM
Materials industry group
5.11
- Max
- 9.62
- MLM
- 5.11
- Q3
- 4.34
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) at 2.09 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Gold Fields (GFI) at 7.78 prices above its benchmark range — GFI looks rich relative to book.
GFI
Materials industry group
7.78
- GFI
- 7.78
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
MLM
Materials industry group
2.09
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- MLM
- 2.09
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | GFI | MLM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 8.03 | 38.67 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 3.05 | 5.11 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 7.78 | 2.09 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 12.05% | 4.54% |