Seek Returns logo

FUTU vs. RKT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FUTU and RKT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

FUTU trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, RKT is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolFUTURKT
Company NameFutu Holdings LimitedRocket Companies, Inc.
CountryHong KongUnited States
GICS SectorFinancialsFinancials
GICS IndustryCapital MarketsFinancial Services
Market Capitalization24.87 billion USD37.49 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGMNYSE
Listing DateMarch 8, 2019August 6, 2020
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FUTU and RKT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FUTU vs. RKT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFUTURKT
5-Day Price Return2.24%-5.13%
13-Week Price Return63.01%37.14%
26-Week Price Return51.51%38.10%
52-Week Price Return185.76%-7.45%
Month-to-Date Return16.25%20.24%
Year-to-Date Return123.35%57.73%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.30M16.97M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.44M15.96M
3-Month Volatility58.08%58.40%
Beta0.532.23

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FUTU

23.06%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
38.97%
Q3
21.61%
Median
13.77%
Q1
8.31%
Min
-4.25%

In the upper quartile for the Capital Markets industry, FUTU’s Return on Equity of 23.06% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

RKT

-0.01%

Financial Services Industry

Max
40.58%
Q3
20.06%
Median
10.67%
Q1
4.19%
Min
-10.31%

RKT has a negative Return on Equity of -0.01%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

FUTU vs. RKT: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FUTU

40.05%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
66.67%
Q3
35.11%
Median
23.49%
Q1
13.63%
Min
-15.18%

A Net Profit Margin of 40.05% places FUTU in the upper quartile for the Capital Markets industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

RKT

-0.01%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.86%
Q3
25.58%
Median
12.23%
Q1
6.64%
Min
-9.92%

RKT has a negative Net Profit Margin of -0.01%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

FUTU vs. RKT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FUTU

48.72%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
86.40%
Q3
46.46%
Median
32.80%
Q1
18.32%
Min
-21.87%

An Operating Profit Margin of 48.72% places FUTU in the upper quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

RKT

13.77%

Financial Services Industry

Max
77.28%
Q3
37.68%
Median
18.17%
Q1
9.27%
Min
-8.19%

RKT’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.77% is around the midpoint for the Financial Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

FUTU vs. RKT: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFUTURKT
Return on Equity (TTM)23.06%-0.01%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.34%0.00%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)40.05%-0.01%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)48.72%13.77%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)82.01%--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FUTU

1.18

Capital Markets Industry

Max
3.76
Q3
1.89
Median
1.01
Q1
0.54
Min
-0.41

For the Capital Markets industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

RKT

0.40

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.58
Q3
2.59
Median
1.33
Q1
0.69
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

FUTU vs. RKT: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Capital Markets and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FUTU

0.36

Capital Markets Industry

Max
6.62
Q3
2.84
Median
1.02
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Capital Markets industry.

RKT

2.69

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.96
Q3
2.10
Median
0.57
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

FUTU vs. RKT: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Capital Markets and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FUTU

4,725.16

Capital Markets Industry

Max
126.03
Q3
60.98
Median
11.77
Q1
4.95
Min
-36.26

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Capital Markets industry.

RKT

2.42

Financial Services Industry

Max
136.23
Q3
56.08
Median
6.55
Q1
2.01
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

FUTU vs. RKT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFUTURKT
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.180.40
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.180.40
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.362.69
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)4,725.162.42

Growth

Revenue Growth

FUTU vs. RKT: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FUTU vs. RKT: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FUTU

0.00%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
10.26%
Q3
4.86%
Median
2.78%
Q1
1.22%
Min
0.00%

FUTU currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

RKT

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
8.18%
Q3
3.60%
Median
1.56%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

RKT currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

FUTU vs. RKT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FUTU

0.00%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
200.72%
Q3
101.92%
Median
57.97%
Q1
32.36%
Min
0.00%

FUTU has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

RKT

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
155.56%
Q3
63.71%
Median
18.08%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

RKT has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

FUTU vs. RKT: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFUTURKT
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FUTU

8.94

Capital Markets Industry

Max
58.89
Q3
31.00
Median
18.54
Q1
12.09
Min
5.24

In the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry, FUTU’s P/E Ratio of 8.94 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

RKT

--

Financial Services Industry

Max
63.23
Q3
32.10
Median
14.41
Q1
10.81
Min
0.37

P/E Ratio data for RKT is currently unavailable.

FUTU vs. RKT: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FUTU

4.31

Capital Markets Industry

Max
14.49
Q3
7.41
Median
4.68
Q1
2.25
Min
0.04

FUTU’s P/S Ratio of 4.31 aligns with the market consensus for the Capital Markets industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

RKT

7.31

Financial Services Industry

Max
11.16
Q3
5.45
Median
2.61
Q1
1.25
Min
0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

FUTU vs. RKT: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FUTU

2.50

Capital Markets Industry

Max
9.48
Q3
4.94
Median
2.42
Q1
1.21
Min
0.38

FUTU’s P/B Ratio of 2.50 is within the conventional range for the Capital Markets industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

RKT

3.81

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.09
Q3
3.79
Median
1.46
Q1
0.83
Min
0.04

RKT’s P/B Ratio of 3.81 is in the upper tier for the Financial Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

FUTU vs. RKT: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Capital Markets and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFUTURKT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)8.94--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.317.31
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.503.81
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)2.8720.65