Seek Returns logo

FUTU vs. PUK: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FUTU and PUK, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Both FUTU and PUK are American Depositary Receipts (ADRs). This provides U.S. investors with straightforward access to investing in these foreign-listed companies.

SymbolFUTUPUK
Company NameFutu Holdings LimitedPrudential plc
CountryHong KongHong Kong
GICS SectorFinancialsFinancials
GICS IndustryCapital MarketsInsurance
Market Capitalization26.54 billion USD34.69 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGMNYSE
Listing DateMarch 8, 2019June 29, 2000
Security TypeADRADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FUTU and PUK by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FUTU vs. PUK: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFUTUPUK
5-Day Price Return10.25%1.90%
13-Week Price Return74.59%20.86%
26-Week Price Return54.29%37.42%
52-Week Price Return204.20%50.78%
Month-to-Date Return24.05%3.63%
Year-to-Date Return138.33%56.80%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.69M2.51M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.40M3.79M
3-Month Volatility58.80%18.17%
Beta0.551.50

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FUTU

23.06%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
38.97%
Q3
21.61%
Median
13.77%
Q1
8.31%
Min
-4.25%

In the upper quartile for the Capital Markets industry, FUTU’s Return on Equity of 23.06% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

PUK

13.58%

Insurance Industry

Max
29.03%
Q3
18.11%
Median
13.90%
Q1
10.42%
Min
-0.64%

PUK’s Return on Equity of 13.58% is on par with the norm for the Insurance industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

FUTU vs. PUK: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FUTU

40.05%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
66.67%
Q3
35.11%
Median
23.49%
Q1
13.63%
Min
-15.18%

A Net Profit Margin of 40.05% places FUTU in the upper quartile for the Capital Markets industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

PUK

19.26%

Insurance Industry

Max
26.78%
Q3
14.06%
Median
9.15%
Q1
5.48%
Min
-7.05%

A Net Profit Margin of 19.26% places PUK in the upper quartile for the Insurance industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

FUTU vs. PUK: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FUTU

48.72%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
86.40%
Q3
46.46%
Median
32.80%
Q1
18.32%
Min
-21.87%

An Operating Profit Margin of 48.72% places FUTU in the upper quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

PUK

20.87%

Insurance Industry

Max
35.49%
Q3
19.49%
Median
14.35%
Q1
8.53%
Min
-5.25%

In the Insurance industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

FUTU vs. PUK: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFUTUPUK
Return on Equity (TTM)23.06%13.58%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.34%1.28%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)40.05%19.26%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)48.72%20.87%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)82.01%--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FUTU

1.18

Capital Markets Industry

Max
3.76
Q3
1.89
Median
1.01
Q1
0.54
Min
-0.41

For the Capital Markets industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

PUK

0.36

Insurance Industry

Max
2.97
Q3
1.33
Median
0.55
Q1
0.15
Min
0.00

For the Insurance industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

FUTU vs. PUK: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Capital Markets and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FUTU

0.36

Capital Markets Industry

Max
6.62
Q3
2.84
Median
1.02
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Capital Markets industry.

PUK

0.27

Insurance Industry

Max
1.25
Q3
0.65
Median
0.34
Q1
0.22
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Insurance industry.

FUTU vs. PUK: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Capital Markets and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FUTU

4,725.16

Capital Markets Industry

Max
126.03
Q3
60.98
Median
11.77
Q1
4.95
Min
-36.26

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Capital Markets industry.

PUK

8.97

Insurance Industry

Max
43.68
Q3
20.84
Median
9.56
Q1
3.34
Min
-5.73

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Insurance industry.

FUTU vs. PUK: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFUTUPUK
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.180.36
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.180.36
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.360.27
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)4,725.168.97

Growth

Revenue Growth

FUTU vs. PUK: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FUTU vs. PUK: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FUTU

0.00%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
10.26%
Q3
4.86%
Median
2.78%
Q1
1.22%
Min
0.00%

FUTU currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

PUK

1.62%

Insurance Industry

Max
8.23%
Q3
4.54%
Median
3.42%
Q1
1.97%
Min
0.00%

PUK’s Dividend Yield of 1.62% is in the lower quartile for the Insurance industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

FUTU vs. PUK: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FUTU

0.00%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
200.72%
Q3
101.92%
Median
57.97%
Q1
32.36%
Min
0.00%

FUTU has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

PUK

24.16%

Insurance Industry

Max
168.02%
Q3
85.57%
Median
50.71%
Q1
22.04%
Min
0.00%

PUK’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 24.16% is within the typical range for the Insurance industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

FUTU vs. PUK: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFUTUPUK
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%1.62%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%24.16%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FUTU

8.94

Capital Markets Industry

Max
58.89
Q3
31.00
Median
18.54
Q1
12.09
Min
5.24

In the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry, FUTU’s P/E Ratio of 8.94 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

PUK

14.95

Insurance Industry

Max
28.91
Q3
17.76
Median
13.63
Q1
10.02
Min
2.89

PUK’s P/E Ratio of 14.95 is within the middle range for the Insurance industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FUTU vs. PUK: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FUTU

4.31

Capital Markets Industry

Max
14.49
Q3
7.41
Median
4.68
Q1
2.25
Min
0.04

FUTU’s P/S Ratio of 4.31 aligns with the market consensus for the Capital Markets industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

PUK

2.88

Insurance Industry

Max
3.72
Q3
1.98
Median
1.23
Q1
0.81
Min
0.23

PUK’s P/S Ratio of 2.88 is in the upper echelon for the Insurance industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

FUTU vs. PUK: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FUTU

2.50

Capital Markets Industry

Max
9.48
Q3
4.94
Median
2.42
Q1
1.21
Min
0.38

FUTU’s P/B Ratio of 2.50 is within the conventional range for the Capital Markets industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

PUK

1.31

Insurance Industry

Max
4.37
Q3
2.48
Median
1.68
Q1
1.19
Min
0.19

PUK’s P/B Ratio of 1.31 is within the conventional range for the Insurance industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

FUTU vs. PUK: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Capital Markets and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFUTUPUK
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)8.9414.95
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.312.88
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.501.31
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)2.879.74