FTV vs. XYZ: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on November 22, 2025

Here’s a clear look at FTV and XYZ, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	FTV	XYZ
Company Name	Fortive Corporation	Block, Inc.
Country	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Industrials	Financials
GICS Industry	Machinery	Financial Services
Market Capitalization	17.31 billion USD	36.37 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	July 5, 2016	November 19, 2015
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FTV and XYZ by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FTV vs. XYZ: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	FTV	XYZ
5-Day Price Return	0.51%	-9.46%
13-Week Price Return	7.12%	-20.21%
26-Week Price Return	-29.95%	3.97%
52-Week Price Return	-32.29%	-29.53%
Month-to-Date Return	2.48%	-20.36%
Year-to-Date Return	-31.21%	-28.84%
10-Day Avg. Volume	3.18M	8.46M
3-Month Avg. Volume	3.68M	9.08M
3-Month Volatility	19.37%	41.27%
Beta	1.05	2.71

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FTV

6.46%

Machinery Industry

Max: 30.85%
Q3: 19.99%
Median: 12.37%
Q1: 8.44%
Min: -7.69%

FTV’s Return on Equity of 6.46% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

XYZ

14.35%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 34.42%
Q3: 16.76%
Median: 9.18%
Q1: 3.90%
Min: -10.16%

XYZ’s Return on Equity of 14.35% is on par with the norm for the Financial Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

FTV vs. XYZ: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FTV

10.68%

Machinery Industry

Max: 19.28%
Q3: 10.99%
Median: 7.89%
Q1: 5.16%
Min: -1.46%

FTV’s Net Profit Margin of 10.68% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Machinery industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

XYZ

13.08%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 52.16%
Q3: 25.33%
Median: 13.11%
Q1: 7.04%
Min: -8.99%

XYZ’s Net Profit Margin of 13.08% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Financial Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

FTV vs. XYZ: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FTV

16.36%

Machinery Industry

Max: 27.20%
Q3: 15.91%
Median: 11.33%
Q1: 7.73%
Min: 0.23%

An Operating Profit Margin of 16.36% places FTV in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

XYZ

5.16%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 81.07%
Q3: 40.32%
Median: 19.93%
Q1: 10.20%
Min: -34.40%

XYZ’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.16% is in the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

FTV vs. XYZ: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	FTV	XYZ
Return on Equity (TTM)	6.46%	14.35%
Return on Assets (TTM)	3.75%	8.41%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	10.68%	13.08%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	16.36%	5.16%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	60.33%	40.87%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FTV

0.70

Machinery Industry

Max: 3.27
Q3: 2.16
Median: 1.75
Q1: 1.32
Min: 0.70

FTV’s Current Ratio of 0.70 falls into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

XYZ

2.18

Financial Services Industry

Max: 4.36
Q3: 2.26
Median: 1.33
Q1: 0.86
Min: 0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

FTV vs. XYZ: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FTV

0.51

Machinery Industry

Max: 1.49
Q3: 0.75
Median: 0.45
Q1: 0.23
Min: 0.00

FTV’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.51 is typical for the Machinery industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

XYZ

0.35

Financial Services Industry

Max: 5.07
Q3: 2.14
Median: 0.55
Q1: 0.11
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

FTV vs. XYZ: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FTV

6.04

Machinery Industry

Max: 67.55
Q3: 36.46
Median: 13.55
Q1: 7.73
Min: -1.43

In the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, FTV’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.04 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

XYZ

12.18

Financial Services Industry

Max: 140.54
Q3: 57.67
Median: 6.72
Q1: 1.93
Min: -33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

FTV vs. XYZ: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	FTV	XYZ
Current Ratio (MRQ)	0.70	2.18
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	0.51	2.15
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.51	0.35
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	6.04	12.18

Growth

Revenue Growth

FTV vs. XYZ: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FTV vs. XYZ: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FTV

0.62%

Machinery Industry

Max: 4.98%
Q3: 2.83%
Median: 1.89%
Q1: 1.17%
Min: 0.00%

FTV’s Dividend Yield of 0.62% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

XYZ

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 7.52%
Q3: 3.60%
Median: 1.75%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

XYZ currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

FTV vs. XYZ: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FTV

16.72%

Machinery Industry

Max: 209.29%
Q3: 102.41%
Median: 62.34%
Q1: 29.36%
Min: 0.00%

FTV’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 16.72% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

XYZ

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 132.10%
Q3: 64.32%
Median: 17.51%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

XYZ has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

FTV vs. XYZ: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	FTV	XYZ
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.62%	0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	16.72%	0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FTV

27.05

Machinery Industry

Max: 46.28
Q3: 29.52
Median: 24.18
Q1: 16.92
Min: 7.99

FTV’s P/E Ratio of 27.05 is within the middle range for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

XYZ

13.79

Financial Services Industry

Max: 46.13
Q3: 28.79
Median: 13.18
Q1: 9.14
Min: 0.47

XYZ’s P/E Ratio of 13.79 is within the middle range for the Financial Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FTV vs. XYZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FTV

2.89

Machinery Industry

Max: 5.25
Q3: 2.82
Median: 1.74
Q1: 0.99
Min: 0.27

FTV’s P/S Ratio of 2.89 is in the upper echelon for the Machinery industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

XYZ

1.80

Financial Services Industry

Max: 9.71
Q3: 4.81
Median: 2.49
Q1: 1.25
Min: 0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

FTV vs. XYZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FTV

2.52

Machinery Industry

Max: 7.18
Q3: 4.18
Median: 2.71
Q1: 1.54
Min: 0.52

FTV’s P/B Ratio of 2.52 is within the conventional range for the Machinery industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

XYZ

1.96

Financial Services Industry

Max: 7.21
Q3: 3.51
Median: 1.52
Q1: 0.88
Min: 0.08

XYZ’s P/B Ratio of 1.96 is within the conventional range for the Financial Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

FTV vs. XYZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	FTV	XYZ
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	27.05	13.79
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	2.89	1.80
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	2.52	1.96
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	14.71	23.44