FTV vs. RBLX: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on October 5, 2025

Here’s a clear look at FTV and RBLX, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	FTV	RBLX
Company Name	Fortive Corporation	Roblox Corporation
Country	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Industrials	Communication Services
GICS Industry	Machinery	Entertainment
Market Capitalization	17.06 billion USD	85.05 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	July 5, 2016	March 10, 2021
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FTV and RBLX by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FTV vs. RBLX: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	FTV	RBLX
5-Day Price Return	3.07%	-13.33%
13-Week Price Return	-4.98%	18.44%
26-Week Price Return	-31.12%	110.48%
52-Week Price Return	-35.08%	182.76%
Month-to-Date Return	2.90%	-11.43%
Year-to-Date Return	-32.79%	112.05%
10-Day Avg. Volume	3.12M	7.23M
3-Month Avg. Volume	3.93M	8.62M
3-Month Volatility	22.34%	53.23%
Beta	1.06	1.64

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FTV

7.44%

Machinery Industry

Max: 33.68%
Q3: 20.05%
Median: 12.37%
Q1: 8.67%
Min: -7.69%

FTV’s Return on Equity of 7.44% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

RBLX

-354.27%

Entertainment Industry

Max: 42.50%
Q3: 24.06%
Median: 13.69%
Q1: 5.35%
Min: -17.95%

RBLX has a negative Return on Equity of -354.27%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

FTV vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FTV

12.51%

Machinery Industry

Max: 19.72%
Q3: 11.07%
Median: 7.62%
Q1: 5.05%
Min: -1.52%

A Net Profit Margin of 12.51% places FTV in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

RBLX

-23.67%

Entertainment Industry

Max: 45.33%
Q3: 24.40%
Median: 13.94%
Q1: 4.28%
Min: -23.67%

RBLX has a negative Net Profit Margin of -23.67%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

FTV vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FTV

17.22%

Machinery Industry

Max: 26.63%
Q3: 15.99%
Median: 11.27%
Q1: 7.72%
Min: -0.51%

An Operating Profit Margin of 17.22% places FTV in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

RBLX

-27.35%

Entertainment Industry

Max: 41.77%
Q3: 28.26%
Median: 16.13%
Q1: 8.03%
Min: -3.93%

RBLX has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -27.35%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

FTV vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	FTV	RBLX
Return on Equity (TTM)	7.44%	-354.27%
Return on Assets (TTM)	4.40%	-13.06%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	12.51%	-23.67%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	17.22%	-27.35%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	59.78%	78.01%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FTV

0.98

Machinery Industry

Max: 3.13
Q3: 2.12
Median: 1.72
Q1: 1.34
Min: 0.77

FTV’s Current Ratio of 0.98 falls into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

RBLX

0.97

Entertainment Industry

Max: 6.76
Q3: 4.02
Median: 1.55
Q1: 0.86
Min: 0.38

RBLX’s Current Ratio of 0.97 aligns with the median group of the Entertainment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

FTV vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FTV

0.46

Machinery Industry

Max: 1.56
Q3: 0.79
Median: 0.44
Q1: 0.27
Min: 0.00

FTV’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.46 is typical for the Machinery industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

RBLX

2.85

Entertainment Industry

Max: 1.54
Q3: 0.77
Median: 0.16
Q1: 0.02
Min: 0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.85, RBLX operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Entertainment industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

FTV vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FTV

6.04

Machinery Industry

Max: 81.58
Q3: 37.68
Median: 13.76
Q1: 7.97
Min: -1.43

In the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, FTV’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.04 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

RBLX

-845.00

Entertainment Industry

Max: 87.17
Q3: 35.59
Median: 7.06
Q1: 1.13
Min: -44.74

RBLX has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -845.00. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

FTV vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	FTV	RBLX
Current Ratio (MRQ)	0.98	0.97
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	0.77	0.96
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.46	2.85
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	6.04	-845.00

Growth

Revenue Growth

FTV vs. RBLX: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FTV vs. RBLX: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FTV

0.64%

Machinery Industry

Max: 4.55%
Q3: 2.66%
Median: 1.90%
Q1: 1.23%
Min: 0.00%

FTV’s Dividend Yield of 0.64% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

RBLX

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max: 2.90%
Q3: 1.29%
Median: 0.59%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

RBLX currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

FTV vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FTV

14.22%

Machinery Industry

Max: 198.34%
Q3: 101.42%
Median: 62.79%
Q1: 29.85%
Min: 0.00%

FTV’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 14.22% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

RBLX

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max: 82.30%
Q3: 38.45%
Median: 29.74%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

RBLX has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

FTV vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	FTV	RBLX
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.64%	0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	14.22%	0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FTV

22.19

Machinery Industry

Max: 47.95
Q3: 30.11
Median: 22.35
Q1: 16.56
Min: 6.48

FTV’s P/E Ratio of 22.19 is within the middle range for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

RBLX

Entertainment Industry

Max: 92.09
Q3: 54.51
Median: 28.92
Q1: 19.75
Min: 2.96

P/E Ratio data for RBLX is currently unavailable.

FTV vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FTV

2.78

Machinery Industry

Max: 4.97
Q3: 2.76
Median: 1.65
Q1: 1.04
Min: 0.04

FTV’s P/S Ratio of 2.78 is in the upper echelon for the Machinery industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

RBLX

21.14

Entertainment Industry

Max: 12.34
Q3: 7.67
Median: 5.06
Q1: 2.72
Min: 0.67

With a P/S Ratio of 21.14, RBLX trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Entertainment industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

FTV vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FTV

2.34

Machinery Industry

Max: 7.29
Q3: 4.06
Median: 2.67
Q1: 1.54
Min: 0.52

FTV’s P/B Ratio of 2.34 is within the conventional range for the Machinery industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

RBLX

202.01

Entertainment Industry

Max: 22.84
Q3: 10.54
Median: 6.60
Q1: 2.30
Min: 0.65

At 202.01, RBLX’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Entertainment industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

FTV vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	FTV	RBLX
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	22.19	--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	2.78	21.14
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	2.34	202.01
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	12.31	90.31