FTV vs. HONA: Fortive vs. Honeywell Aerospace Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Fortive (FTV) and Honeywell Aerospace (HONA) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but FTV is classified in Machinery while HONA is classified in Aerospace & Defense.

Fortive (FTV) has been public since July 5, 2016 with a meaningfully longer listed history, while Honeywell Aerospace (HONA) only listed on June 15, 2026 — long-window metrics on the HONA side should be interpreted with caution.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Honeywell Aerospace (HONA) reports a negative beta of -5.78, suggesting inverse market sensitivity over the measurement window. That is uncommon for ordinary equities and can reflect commodity-linked or hedge-like exposure, but it can also come from statistical noise. Fortive (FTV) has a non-negative beta of 1.01.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Both FTV and HONA need 1-year volatility and 1-year return to plot risk-return positioning.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Capital efficiency shows on one side only: Fortive (FTV) earns 10.55% on shareholders’ equity, ranked against its industry; Honeywell Aerospace (HONA) has no ROE this period.

Fortive (FTV) at 14.83% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Honeywell Aerospace (HONA) at 11.25%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

Both Fortive (FTV) at 21.30% and Honeywell Aerospace (HONA) at 23.69% convert sales into operating profit at a top-quartile rate, pointing to tighter cost discipline before financing and tax.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Both Fortive (FTV) at 1.92% and Honeywell Aerospace (HONA) at 12.68% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Fortive (FTV) at -26.69% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Honeywell Aerospace (HONA) at -36.80% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Honeywell Aerospace (HONA) at 1.64 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Fortive (FTV) at 1.23 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for FTV.

Only one side’s leverage can be read here: Fortive (FTV) carries debt-to-equity ratio of 0.60 against its industry range, while Honeywell Aerospace (HONA) reports no figure this period.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Honeywell Aerospace (HONA) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Fortive (FTV) reports a yield of 0.38%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Honeywell Aerospace (HONA) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Fortive (FTV) reports a payout of 11.85%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Fortive (FTV) at 30.98 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Honeywell Aerospace (HONA) at 43.32 sits in the richer quartile — HONA needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.

Honeywell Aerospace (HONA) at 2.69 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Fortive (FTV) at 4.43 sits in the pricier quartile — FTV costs more per dollar of sales.

Honeywell Aerospace (HONA) reports a negative P/B ratio of -18.85, meaning negative book equity — the multiple itself is not meaningful for valuation. Meanwhile Fortive (FTV) reports 3.28, ranking against industry peers normally.

Valuation Metrics