Seek Returns

FTI vs. WMB: TechnipFMC vs. Williams Stock Comparison

How do TechnipFMC (FTI) and Williams (WMB) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

TechnipFMC (FTI) and Williams (WMB) both fall under the Energy industry group, but FTI is classified in Energy Equipment & Services while WMB is classified in Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels.

Company profile comparison for TechnipFMC (FTI) and Williams (WMB)
Profile ItemFTIWMB
NameTechnipFMC plcThe Williams Companies, Inc.
Country/RegionUnited KingdomUnited States
GICS SectorEnergyEnergy
GICS Industry GroupEnergyEnergy
GICS IndustryEnergy Equipment & ServicesOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
GICS Sub-IndustryOil & Gas Equipment & ServicesOil & Gas Storage & Transportation
Market Capitalization24.70 billion USD80.11 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 15, 2001December 31, 1981
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

FTI
WMB
GSPC
Loading price history…
TechnipFMC (FTI) vs. Williams (WMB), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for TechnipFMC (FTI) and Williams (WMB). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for TechnipFMC (FTI) and Williams (WMB). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for TechnipFMC (FTI) and Williams (WMB)
MetricFTIWMB
Total Return (1Y)51.75%14.81%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)46.71%28.70%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)54.94%23.72%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

FTI
WMB
GSPC
Loading price history…
TechnipFMC (FTI) vs. Williams (WMB), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for TechnipFMC (FTI) and Williams (WMB). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for TechnipFMC (FTI) and Williams (WMB)
MetricFTIWMB
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)32.65%26.38%
Beta (5Y)0.870.65
Max Drawdown (5Y)-36.71%-23.01%
Avg. Volume (3M)2.86M7.88M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
FTI and WMB are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for TechnipFMC (FTI) and Williams (WMB)
MetricFTIWMB
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)1.450.40
Sortino Ratio (1Y)2.110.56

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

TechnipFMC (FTI) at 38.30% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Williams (WMB) at 18.31% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for FTI.

FTI

Energy industry group

38.30%

Max
53.85%
FTI
38.30%
Q3
24.79%
Median
12.85%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%

WMB

Energy industry group

18.31%

Max
53.85%
Q3
24.79%
WMB
18.31%
Median
12.85%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%
Loading chart…
TechnipFMC (FTI) vs. Williams (WMB): A comparison of their ROE against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Williams (WMB) at 24.66% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of TechnipFMC (FTI) at 12.04%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

FTI

Energy industry group

12.04%

Max
56.92%
Q3
22.92%
FTI
12.04%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%

WMB

Energy industry group

24.66%

Max
56.92%
WMB
24.66%
Q3
22.92%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%
Loading chart…
TechnipFMC (FTI) vs. Williams (WMB): A comparison of their net margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both TechnipFMC (FTI) at 17.77% and Williams (WMB) at 32.69% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

FTI

Energy industry group

17.77%

Max
71.31%
Q3
33.75%
Median
18.73%
FTI
17.77%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%

WMB

Energy industry group

32.69%

Max
71.31%
Q3
33.75%
WMB
32.69%
Median
18.73%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%
Loading chart…
TechnipFMC (FTI) vs. Williams (WMB): A comparison of their operating margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for TechnipFMC (FTI) and Williams (WMB)
MetricFTIWMB
ROE (TTM)38.30%18.31%
ROA (TTM)10.08%4.59%
Net Margin (TTM)12.04%24.66%
Operating Margin (TTM)17.77%32.69%
Gross Margin (TTM)23.60%63.05%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Both TechnipFMC (FTI) at 9.35% and Williams (WMB) at 13.78% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Loading chart…
TechnipFMC (FTI) vs. Williams (WMB): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Both TechnipFMC (FTI) at 20.42% and Williams (WMB) at 17.58% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Loading chart…
TechnipFMC (FTI) vs. Williams (WMB): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for TechnipFMC (FTI) and Williams (WMB)
MetricFTIWMB
Revenue Growth (YoY)9.35%13.78%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)14.02%2.91%
EPS Growth (YoY)20.42%17.58%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)--8.62%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

TechnipFMC (FTI) at 1.09 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Williams (WMB) at 0.75 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for WMB.

FTI

Energy industry group

1.09

Max
3.64
Q3
2.21
Median
1.41
FTI
1.09
Q1
0.88
Min
0.24

WMB

Energy industry group

0.75

Max
3.64
Q3
2.21
Median
1.41
Q1
0.88
WMB
0.75
Min
0.24
Loading chart…
TechnipFMC (FTI) vs. Williams (WMB): A comparison of their current ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

TechnipFMC (FTI) at 0.39 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while Williams (WMB) at 1.58 uses more debt funding than most peers.

FTI

Energy industry group

0.39

Max
1.75
Q3
0.93
Median
0.54
FTI
0.39
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

WMB

Energy industry group

1.58

Max
1.75
WMB
1.58
Q3
0.93
Median
0.54
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
TechnipFMC (FTI) vs. Williams (WMB): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for TechnipFMC (FTI) and Williams (WMB)
MetricFTIWMB
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.090.75
Debt / Equity (MRQ)0.391.58
Net Debt / EBITDA0.124.58

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both TechnipFMC (FTI) at 0.32% and Williams (WMB) at 3.23% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

FTI

Energy industry group

0.32%

Max
8.57%
Q3
3.58%
Median
1.71%
FTI
0.32%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

WMB

Energy industry group

3.23%

Max
8.57%
Q3
3.58%
WMB
3.23%
Median
1.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
TechnipFMC (FTI) vs. Williams (WMB): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

TechnipFMC (FTI) at 6.29% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Williams (WMB) at 81.69% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.

FTI

Energy industry group

6.29%

Max
133.24%
Q3
53.31%
Median
25.24%
FTI
6.29%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

WMB

Energy industry group

81.69%

Max
133.24%
WMB
81.69%
Q3
53.31%
Median
25.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
TechnipFMC (FTI) vs. Williams (WMB): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for TechnipFMC (FTI) and Williams (WMB)
MetricFTIWMB
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.32%3.23%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)6.29%81.69%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

TechnipFMC (FTI) at 19.97 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Williams (WMB) at 25.23 sits in the richer quartile — WMB needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.

FTI

Energy industry group

19.97

Max
39.54
Q3
21.72
FTI
19.97
Median
12.19
Q1
7.71
Min
2.99

WMB

Energy industry group

25.23

Max
39.54
WMB
25.23
Q3
21.72
Median
12.19
Q1
7.71
Min
2.99
Loading chart…
TechnipFMC (FTI) vs. Williams (WMB): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

TechnipFMC (FTI) at 2.32 prices around its industry’s typical P/S ratio, while Williams (WMB) at 6.32 clears its benchmark range — WMB looks notably rich on sales.

FTI

Energy industry group

2.32

Max
5.40
Q3
2.85
FTI
2.32
Median
1.69
Q1
0.88
Min
0.00

WMB

Energy industry group

6.32

WMB
6.32
Max
5.40
Q3
2.85
Median
1.69
Q1
0.88
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
TechnipFMC (FTI) vs. Williams (WMB): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Measured against book value, both TechnipFMC (FTI) at 7.44 and Williams (WMB) at 5.11 look expensive — each P/B ratio sits above its industry’s benchmark range.

FTI

Energy industry group

7.44

FTI
7.44
Max
4.21
Q3
2.38
Median
1.51
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01

WMB

Energy industry group

5.11

WMB
5.11
Max
4.21
Q3
2.38
Median
1.51
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01
Loading chart…
TechnipFMC (FTI) vs. Williams (WMB): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for TechnipFMC (FTI) and Williams (WMB)
MetricFTIWMB
P/E Ratio (TTM)19.9725.23
P/S Ratio (TTM)2.326.32
P/B Ratio (MRQ)7.445.11
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)6.01%-3.56%