Seek Returns logo

FTI vs. TS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FTI and TS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

FTI is a standard domestic listing, while TS trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolFTITS
Company NameTechnipFMC plcTenaris S.A.
CountryUnited StatesLuxembourg
GICS SectorEnergyEnergy
GICS IndustryEnergy Equipment & ServicesEnergy Equipment & Services
Market Capitalization14.39 billion USD18.80 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 15, 2001December 16, 2002
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FTI and TS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FTI vs. TS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFTITS
5-Day Price Return-0.28%-0.19%
13-Week Price Return13.89%-1.18%
26-Week Price Return13.59%-16.22%
52-Week Price Return33.36%20.34%
Month-to-Date Return-3.71%0.00%
Year-to-Date Return21.01%-14.55%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.57M2.09M
3-Month Avg. Volume4.36M2.22M
3-Month Volatility34.28%27.07%
Beta1.060.72

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FTI

28.74%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
35.03%
Q3
20.76%
Median
14.62%
Q1
7.78%
Min
-6.65%

In the upper quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, FTI’s Return on Equity of 28.74% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

TS

11.86%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
35.03%
Q3
20.76%
Median
14.62%
Q1
7.78%
Min
-6.65%

TS’s Return on Equity of 11.86% is on par with the norm for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

FTI vs. TS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FTI

9.60%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
16.78%
Q3
10.68%
Median
6.39%
Q1
3.11%
Min
1.00%

FTI’s Net Profit Margin of 9.60% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

TS

17.02%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
16.78%
Q3
10.68%
Median
6.39%
Q1
3.11%
Min
1.00%

TS’s Net Profit Margin of 17.02% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

FTI vs. TS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FTI

11.97%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
30.90%
Q3
17.97%
Median
10.83%
Q1
5.79%
Min
-5.29%

FTI’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.97% is around the midpoint for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

TS

18.93%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
30.90%
Q3
17.97%
Median
10.83%
Q1
5.79%
Min
-5.29%

An Operating Profit Margin of 18.93% places TS in the upper quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

FTI vs. TS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFTITS
Return on Equity (TTM)28.74%11.86%
Return on Assets (TTM)9.19%9.70%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)9.60%17.02%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)11.97%18.93%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)20.44%33.79%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FTI

1.10

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
3.39
Q3
2.12
Median
1.44
Q1
1.11
Min
0.64

FTI’s Current Ratio of 1.10 falls into the lower quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

TS

3.41

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
3.39
Q3
2.12
Median
1.44
Q1
1.11
Min
0.64

TS’s Current Ratio of 3.41 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

FTI vs. TS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FTI

0.24

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
1.70
Q3
0.97
Median
0.47
Q1
0.35
Min
0.02

Falling into the lower quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, FTI’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.24 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

TS

0.03

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
1.70
Q3
0.97
Median
0.47
Q1
0.35
Min
0.02

Falling into the lower quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, TS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.03 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

FTI vs. TS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FTI

23.50

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
49.88
Q3
25.59
Median
7.66
Q1
2.90
Min
-17.36

FTI’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 23.50 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

TS

101.80

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
49.88
Q3
25.59
Median
7.66
Q1
2.90
Min
-17.36

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 101.80, TS demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

FTI vs. TS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFTITS
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.103.41
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.822.11
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.240.03
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)23.50101.80

Growth

Revenue Growth

FTI vs. TS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FTI vs. TS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FTI

0.59%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
6.99%
Q3
3.07%
Median
2.19%
Q1
0.38%
Min
0.00%

FTI’s Dividend Yield of 0.59% is consistent with its peers in the Energy Equipment & Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

TS

4.64%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
6.99%
Q3
3.07%
Median
2.19%
Q1
0.38%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 4.64%, TS offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Energy Equipment & Services industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

FTI vs. TS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FTI

9.28%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
200.86%
Q3
147.58%
Median
28.52%
Q1
15.22%
Min
0.00%

FTI’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 9.28% is in the lower quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

TS

85.87%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
200.86%
Q3
147.58%
Median
28.52%
Q1
15.22%
Min
0.00%

TS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 85.87% is within the typical range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

FTI vs. TS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFTITS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.59%4.64%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)9.28%85.87%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FTI

15.77

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
30.60
Q3
21.14
Median
12.35
Q1
10.72
Min
5.76

FTI’s P/E Ratio of 15.77 is within the middle range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

TS

9.69

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
30.60
Q3
21.14
Median
12.35
Q1
10.72
Min
5.76

In the lower quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, TS’s P/E Ratio of 9.69 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

FTI vs. TS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FTI

1.51

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
2.20
Q3
1.58
Median
0.85
Q1
0.55
Min
0.23

FTI’s P/S Ratio of 1.51 aligns with the market consensus for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

TS

1.65

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
2.20
Q3
1.58
Median
0.85
Q1
0.55
Min
0.23

TS’s P/S Ratio of 1.65 is in the upper echelon for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

FTI vs. TS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FTI

4.44

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
3.73
Q3
2.43
Median
1.82
Q1
1.18
Min
0.27

At 4.44, FTI’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

TS

1.21

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
3.73
Q3
2.43
Median
1.82
Q1
1.18
Min
0.27

TS’s P/B Ratio of 1.21 is within the conventional range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

FTI vs. TS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFTITS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)15.779.69
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.511.65
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.441.21
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)10.8910.42