Seek Returns logo

FTI vs. SLB: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FTI and SLB, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolFTISLB
Company NameTechnipFMC plcSchlumberger Limited
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorEnergyEnergy
GICS IndustryEnergy Equipment & ServicesEnergy Equipment & Services
Market Capitalization16.72 billion USD53.06 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 15, 2001December 31, 1981
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FTI and SLB by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FTI vs. SLB: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFTISLB
5-Day Price Return-0.23%-0.69%
13-Week Price Return14.55%1.69%
26-Week Price Return28.17%-18.98%
52-Week Price Return54.34%-18.73%
Month-to-Date Return7.32%-6.70%
Year-to-Date Return36.32%-10.35%
10-Day Avg. Volume5.31M19.17M
3-Month Avg. Volume5.04M16.05M
3-Month Volatility33.93%30.33%
Beta1.030.99

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FTI

28.74%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
35.03%
Q3
19.11%
Median
12.78%
Q1
7.55%
Min
-1.07%

In the upper quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, FTI’s Return on Equity of 28.74% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

SLB

19.85%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
35.03%
Q3
19.11%
Median
12.78%
Q1
7.55%
Min
-1.07%

In the upper quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, SLB’s Return on Equity of 19.85% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

FTI vs. SLB: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FTI

9.60%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
17.17%
Q3
9.96%
Median
6.67%
Q1
3.84%
Min
-0.90%

FTI’s Net Profit Margin of 9.60% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

SLB

11.53%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
17.17%
Q3
9.96%
Median
6.67%
Q1
3.84%
Min
-0.90%

A Net Profit Margin of 11.53% places SLB in the upper quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

FTI vs. SLB: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FTI

11.97%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
31.93%
Q3
18.93%
Median
11.31%
Q1
4.98%
Min
0.83%

FTI’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.97% is around the midpoint for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

SLB

15.24%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
31.93%
Q3
18.93%
Median
11.31%
Q1
4.98%
Min
0.83%

SLB’s Operating Profit Margin of 15.24% is around the midpoint for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

FTI vs. SLB: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFTISLB
Return on Equity (TTM)28.74%19.85%
Return on Assets (TTM)9.19%8.33%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)9.60%11.53%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)11.97%15.24%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)20.44%20.29%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FTI

1.10

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
3.41
Q3
2.08
Median
1.38
Q1
1.10
Min
0.68

FTI’s Current Ratio of 1.10 aligns with the median group of the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

SLB

1.31

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
3.41
Q3
2.08
Median
1.38
Q1
1.10
Min
0.68

SLB’s Current Ratio of 1.31 aligns with the median group of the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

FTI vs. SLB: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FTI

0.24

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
2.06
Q3
1.10
Median
0.48
Q1
0.34
Min
0.02

Falling into the lower quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, FTI’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.24 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

SLB

0.67

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
2.06
Q3
1.10
Median
0.48
Q1
0.34
Min
0.02

SLB’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.67 is typical for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

FTI vs. SLB: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FTI

23.50

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
49.88
Q3
26.65
Median
7.66
Q1
2.15
Min
-17.36

FTI’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 23.50 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

SLB

43.97

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
49.88
Q3
26.65
Median
7.66
Q1
2.15
Min
-17.36

SLB’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 43.97 is in the upper quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

FTI vs. SLB: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFTISLB
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.101.31
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.820.98
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.240.67
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)23.5043.97

Growth

Revenue Growth

FTI vs. SLB: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FTI vs. SLB: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FTI

0.52%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
8.36%
Q3
4.38%
Median
2.41%
Q1
0.32%
Min
0.00%

FTI’s Dividend Yield of 0.52% is consistent with its peers in the Energy Equipment & Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

SLB

3.00%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
8.36%
Q3
4.38%
Median
2.41%
Q1
0.32%
Min
0.00%

SLB’s Dividend Yield of 3.00% is consistent with its peers in the Energy Equipment & Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

FTI vs. SLB: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FTI

9.28%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
169.85%
Q3
94.25%
Median
39.49%
Q1
15.00%
Min
0.00%

FTI’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 9.28% is in the lower quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

SLB

38.00%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
169.85%
Q3
94.25%
Median
39.49%
Q1
15.00%
Min
0.00%

SLB’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 38.00% is within the typical range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

FTI vs. SLB: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFTISLB
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.52%3.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)9.28%38.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FTI

17.91

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
22.89
Q3
18.22
Median
13.03
Q1
11.98
Min
7.14

FTI’s P/E Ratio of 17.91 is within the middle range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

SLB

12.68

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
22.89
Q3
18.22
Median
13.03
Q1
11.98
Min
7.14

SLB’s P/E Ratio of 12.68 is within the middle range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FTI vs. SLB: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FTI

1.72

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
2.84
Q3
1.60
Median
0.87
Q1
0.54
Min
0.23

FTI’s P/S Ratio of 1.72 is in the upper echelon for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

SLB

1.46

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
2.84
Q3
1.60
Median
0.87
Q1
0.54
Min
0.23

SLB’s P/S Ratio of 1.46 aligns with the market consensus for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

FTI vs. SLB: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FTI

4.44

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
4.44
Q3
2.60
Median
1.77
Q1
1.17
Min
0.24

FTI’s P/B Ratio of 4.44 is in the upper tier for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

SLB

2.25

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
4.44
Q3
2.60
Median
1.77
Q1
1.17
Min
0.24

SLB’s P/B Ratio of 2.25 is within the conventional range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

FTI vs. SLB: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFTISLB
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)17.9112.68
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.721.46
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.442.25
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)12.3710.81