FTI vs. HAL: TechnipFMC vs. Halliburton Stock Comparison
How do TechnipFMC (FTI) and Halliburton (HAL) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
TechnipFMC (FTI) and Halliburton (HAL) are both classified in the Oil & Gas Equipment & Services sub-industry within the broader Energy Equipment & Services industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.
| Profile Item | FTI | HAL |
|---|---|---|
| Name | TechnipFMC plc | Halliburton Company |
| Country/Region | United Kingdom | United States |
| GICS Sector | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry Group | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry | Energy Equipment & Services | Energy Equipment & Services |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services |
| Market Capitalization | 24.70 billion USD | 26.34 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | June 15, 2001 | June 1, 1972 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | FTI | HAL |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 51.75% | 18.66% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 46.71% | -3.16% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 54.94% | 7.11% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | FTI | HAL |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 32.65% | 33.27% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.87 | 0.77 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -36.71% | -54.01% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 2.86M | 10.27M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | FTI | HAL |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 1.45 | 0.43 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 2.11 | 0.64 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
TechnipFMC (FTI) at 38.30% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Halliburton (HAL) at 18.78% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for FTI.
FTI
Energy industry group
38.30%
- Max
- 53.85%
- FTI
- 38.30%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
HAL
Energy industry group
18.78%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- HAL
- 18.78%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both TechnipFMC (FTI) at 12.04% and Halliburton (HAL) at 8.90% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
FTI
Energy industry group
12.04%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- FTI
- 12.04%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
HAL
Energy industry group
8.90%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- Median
- 10.10%
- HAL
- 8.90%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both TechnipFMC (FTI) at 17.77% and Halliburton (HAL) at 12.43% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
FTI
Energy industry group
17.77%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- Median
- 18.73%
- FTI
- 17.77%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
HAL
Energy industry group
12.43%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- Median
- 18.73%
- HAL
- 12.43%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | FTI | HAL |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 38.30% | 18.78% |
| ROA (TTM) | 10.08% | 7.23% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 12.04% | 8.90% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 17.77% | 12.43% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 23.60% | 14.83% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both TechnipFMC (FTI) at 9.35% and Halliburton (HAL) at -3.31% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Both TechnipFMC (FTI) at 20.42% and Halliburton (HAL) at -47.00% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | FTI | HAL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 9.35% | -3.31% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 14.02% | 3.01% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 20.42% | -47.00% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -- | -4.83% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both TechnipFMC (FTI) at 1.09 and Halliburton (HAL) at 2.02 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.
FTI
Energy industry group
1.09
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- FTI
- 1.09
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
HAL
Energy industry group
2.02
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- HAL
- 2.02
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both TechnipFMC (FTI) at 0.39 and Halliburton (HAL) at 0.73 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
FTI
Energy industry group
0.39
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- FTI
- 0.39
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
HAL
Energy industry group
0.73
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- HAL
- 0.73
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | FTI | HAL |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.09 | 2.02 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.39 | 0.73 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.12 | 1.54 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both TechnipFMC (FTI) at 0.32% and Halliburton (HAL) at 2.13% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
FTI
Energy industry group
0.32%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- Median
- 1.71%
- FTI
- 0.32%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
HAL
Energy industry group
2.13%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- HAL
- 2.13%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both TechnipFMC (FTI) at 6.29% and Halliburton (HAL) at 28.57% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
FTI
Energy industry group
6.29%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- FTI
- 6.29%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
HAL
Energy industry group
28.57%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- HAL
- 28.57%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | FTI | HAL |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.32% | 2.13% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 6.29% | 28.57% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both TechnipFMC (FTI) at 19.97 and Halliburton (HAL) at 13.38 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
FTI
Energy industry group
19.97
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- FTI
- 19.97
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
HAL
Energy industry group
13.38
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- HAL
- 13.38
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
P/S Ratio (TTM)
On P/S ratio, both TechnipFMC (FTI) at 2.32 and Halliburton (HAL) at 1.17 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.
FTI
Energy industry group
2.32
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- FTI
- 2.32
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
HAL
Energy industry group
1.17
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- HAL
- 1.17
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Halliburton (HAL) at 2.37 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while TechnipFMC (FTI) at 7.44 prices above its benchmark range — FTI looks rich relative to book.
FTI
Energy industry group
7.44
- FTI
- 7.44
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
HAL
Energy industry group
2.37
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- HAL
- 2.37
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | FTI | HAL |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 19.97 | 13.38 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 2.32 | 1.17 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 7.44 | 2.37 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 6.01% | 6.20% |