Seek Returns logo

FTAI vs. PWR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FTAI and PWR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolFTAIPWR
Company NameFTAI Aviation Ltd.Quanta Services, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryTrading Companies & DistributorsConstruction & Engineering
Market Capitalization14.98 billion USD56.62 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateMay 14, 2015February 12, 1998
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FTAI and PWR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FTAI vs. PWR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFTAIPWR
5-Day Price Return5.74%-1.91%
13-Week Price Return29.25%14.17%
26-Week Price Return22.89%22.14%
52-Week Price Return40.68%46.12%
Month-to-Date Return6.10%-6.44%
Year-to-Date Return1.36%20.22%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.30M1.31M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.78M1.24M
3-Month Volatility67.10%23.85%
Beta1.691.05

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FTAI

464.64%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
32.33%
Q3
19.92%
Median
14.05%
Q1
11.46%
Min
0.91%

FTAI’s Return on Equity of 464.64% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

PWR

13.09%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
29.61%
Q3
17.18%
Median
10.42%
Q1
8.10%
Min
-0.10%

PWR’s Return on Equity of 13.09% is on par with the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

FTAI vs. PWR: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FTAI

21.31%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
17.73%
Q3
10.81%
Median
6.13%
Q1
4.33%
Min
2.09%

FTAI’s Net Profit Margin of 21.31% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

PWR

3.73%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
11.14%
Q3
6.17%
Median
3.85%
Q1
2.40%
Min
-0.05%

PWR’s Net Profit Margin of 3.73% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

FTAI vs. PWR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FTAI

26.26%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
25.50%
Q3
15.13%
Median
7.46%
Q1
5.44%
Min
3.55%

FTAI’s Operating Profit Margin of 26.26% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

PWR

5.73%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
17.56%
Q3
9.36%
Median
5.46%
Q1
3.47%
Min
-1.93%

PWR’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.73% is around the midpoint for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

FTAI vs. PWR: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFTAIPWR
Return on Equity (TTM)464.64%13.09%
Return on Assets (TTM)11.31%5.08%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)21.31%3.73%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)26.26%5.73%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)48.89%15.04%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FTAI

5.01

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
2.82
Q3
2.13
Median
1.60
Q1
1.43
Min
0.46

FTAI’s Current Ratio of 5.01 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

PWR

1.37

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
1.98
Q3
1.53
Median
1.24
Q1
1.05
Min
0.66

PWR’s Current Ratio of 1.37 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

FTAI vs. PWR: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FTAI

20.88

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
1.88
Q3
1.18
Median
0.74
Q1
0.54
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 20.88, FTAI operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Trading Companies & Distributors industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

PWR

0.60

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.49
Q3
1.19
Median
0.63
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00

PWR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.60 is typical for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

FTAI vs. PWR: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FTAI

1.06

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
15.13
Q3
7.93
Median
5.75
Q1
2.70
Min
-1.67

In the lower quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, FTAI’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.06 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

PWR

10.76

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
23.59
Q3
14.49
Median
8.20
Q1
5.26
Min
-6.49

PWR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 10.76 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

FTAI vs. PWR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFTAIPWR
Current Ratio (MRQ)5.011.37
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.781.24
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)20.880.60
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)1.0610.76

Growth

Revenue Growth

FTAI vs. PWR: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FTAI vs. PWR: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FTAI

0.99%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
4.99%
Q3
3.04%
Median
1.94%
Q1
1.22%
Min
0.00%

FTAI’s Dividend Yield of 0.99% is in the lower quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

PWR

0.10%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
6.28%
Q3
3.25%
Median
2.02%
Q1
0.23%
Min
0.00%

PWR’s Dividend Yield of 0.10% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

FTAI vs. PWR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FTAI

32.60%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
95.14%
Q3
62.08%
Median
51.17%
Q1
26.24%
Min
0.00%

FTAI’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 32.60% is within the typical range for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

PWR

5.92%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
139.17%
Q3
69.47%
Median
40.99%
Q1
10.51%
Min
0.00%

PWR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 5.92% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

FTAI vs. PWR: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFTAIPWR
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.99%0.10%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)32.60%5.92%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FTAI

32.79

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
48.55
Q3
26.73
Median
17.17
Q1
10.78
Min
1.62

A P/E Ratio of 32.79 places FTAI in the upper quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

PWR

59.76

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
36.96
Q3
24.81
Median
15.45
Q1
12.51
Min
2.74

At 59.76, PWR’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

FTAI vs. PWR: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FTAI

6.99

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
4.88
Q3
2.56
Median
1.02
Q1
0.60
Min
0.29

With a P/S Ratio of 6.99, FTAI trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

PWR

2.23

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
3.22
Q3
1.63
Median
0.61
Q1
0.48
Min
0.11

PWR’s P/S Ratio of 2.23 is in the upper echelon for the Construction & Engineering industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

FTAI vs. PWR: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FTAI

71.53

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
8.77
Q3
4.33
Median
2.00
Q1
1.11
Min
0.35

At 71.53, FTAI’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

PWR

7.13

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
5.74
Q3
3.33
Median
1.49
Q1
1.20
Min
0.23

At 7.13, PWR’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Construction & Engineering industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

FTAI vs. PWR: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFTAIPWR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)32.7959.76
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)6.992.23
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)71.537.13
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)--42.76