Seek Returns logo

FSLR vs. TS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FSLR and TS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

FSLR is a standard domestic listing, while TS trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolFSLRTS
Company NameFirst Solar, Inc.Tenaris S.A.
CountryUnited StatesLuxembourg
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyEnergy
GICS IndustrySemiconductors & Semiconductor EquipmentEnergy Equipment & Services
Market Capitalization24.68 billion USD19.50 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateNovember 17, 2006December 16, 2002
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FSLR and TS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FSLR vs. TS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFSLRTS
5-Day Price Return2.95%2.14%
13-Week Price Return24.37%-5.02%
26-Week Price Return82.02%-14.39%
52-Week Price Return-1.84%5.51%
Month-to-Date Return4.35%2.04%
Year-to-Date Return30.58%-14.22%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.31M2.47M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.43M2.15M
3-Month Volatility51.05%23.39%
Beta1.590.72

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FSLR

15.57%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
47.13%
Q3
23.50%
Median
9.94%
Q1
0.86%
Min
-20.69%

FSLR’s Return on Equity of 15.57% is on par with the norm for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

TS

11.86%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
35.03%
Q3
19.11%
Median
12.78%
Q1
7.55%
Min
-1.07%

TS’s Return on Equity of 11.86% is on par with the norm for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

FSLR vs. TS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FSLR

28.95%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
52.41%
Q3
23.88%
Median
10.17%
Q1
1.21%
Min
-32.15%

A Net Profit Margin of 28.95% places FSLR in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

TS

17.02%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
17.17%
Q3
9.96%
Median
6.67%
Q1
3.84%
Min
-0.90%

A Net Profit Margin of 17.02% places TS in the upper quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

FSLR vs. TS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FSLR

31.35%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
58.09%
Q3
27.54%
Median
11.18%
Q1
3.31%
Min
-28.36%

An Operating Profit Margin of 31.35% places FSLR in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

TS

18.93%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
31.93%
Q3
18.93%
Median
11.31%
Q1
4.98%
Min
0.83%

TS’s Operating Profit Margin of 18.93% is around the midpoint for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

FSLR vs. TS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFSLRTS
Return on Equity (TTM)15.57%11.86%
Return on Assets (TTM)10.36%9.70%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)28.95%17.02%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)31.35%18.93%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)42.76%33.79%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FSLR

1.90

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
6.58
Q3
4.24
Median
2.73
Q1
2.13
Min
1.02

FSLR’s Current Ratio of 1.90 falls into the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

TS

3.41

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
3.41
Q3
2.08
Median
1.38
Q1
1.10
Min
0.68

TS’s Current Ratio of 3.41 is in the upper quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

FSLR vs. TS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FSLR

0.12

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.48
Median
0.25
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

FSLR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.12 is typical for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

TS

0.03

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
2.06
Q3
1.10
Median
0.48
Q1
0.34
Min
0.02

Falling into the lower quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, TS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.03 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

FSLR vs. TS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FSLR

39.40

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
174.00
Q3
74.71
Median
26.06
Q1
6.43
Min
-7.80

FSLR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 39.40 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

TS

101.80

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
49.88
Q3
26.65
Median
7.66
Q1
2.15
Min
-17.36

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 101.80, TS demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

FSLR vs. TS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFSLRTS
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.903.41
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.362.11
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.120.03
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)39.40101.80

Growth

Revenue Growth

FSLR vs. TS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FSLR vs. TS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FSLR

0.00%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
3.72%
Q3
1.51%
Median
0.69%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FSLR currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

TS

4.61%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
8.36%
Q3
4.38%
Median
2.41%
Q1
0.32%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 4.61%, TS offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Energy Equipment & Services industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

FSLR vs. TS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FSLR

0.00%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
205.27%
Q3
88.01%
Median
27.13%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FSLR has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

TS

85.87%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
169.85%
Q3
94.25%
Median
39.49%
Q1
15.00%
Min
0.00%

TS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 85.87% is within the typical range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

FSLR vs. TS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFSLRTS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%4.61%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%85.87%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FSLR

20.07

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
106.30
Q3
61.93
Median
38.96
Q1
23.71
Min
13.06

In the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, FSLR’s P/E Ratio of 20.07 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

TS

9.74

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
22.89
Q3
18.22
Median
13.03
Q1
11.98
Min
7.14

In the lower quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, TS’s P/E Ratio of 9.74 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

FSLR vs. TS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FSLR

5.81

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
19.99
Q3
10.21
Median
5.23
Q1
2.88
Min
1.13

FSLR’s P/S Ratio of 5.81 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

TS

1.66

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
2.84
Q3
1.60
Median
0.87
Q1
0.54
Min
0.23

TS’s P/S Ratio of 1.66 is in the upper echelon for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

FSLR vs. TS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FSLR

2.08

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
14.22
Q3
6.94
Median
4.29
Q1
1.99
Min
0.67

FSLR’s P/B Ratio of 2.08 is within the conventional range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

TS

1.21

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
4.44
Q3
2.60
Median
1.77
Q1
1.17
Min
0.24

TS’s P/B Ratio of 1.21 is within the conventional range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

FSLR vs. TS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFSLRTS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)20.079.74
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)5.811.66
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.081.21
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)50.7310.47