FROG vs. QNT: JFrog vs. Quantinuum Stock Comparison

Company Profile

JFrog (FROG) and Quantinuum (QNT) both fall under the Software & Services industry group, but FROG is classified in Software while QNT is classified in IT Services.

JFrog (FROG) has traded publicly since September 16, 2020, giving it several years of listed trading history, while Quantinuum (QNT) only listed on June 4, 2026 and has a limited public-market record.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Quantinuum (QNT) reports a negative beta of -2.69, suggesting inverse market sensitivity over the measurement window. That is uncommon for ordinary equities and can reflect commodity-linked or hedge-like exposure, but it can also come from statistical noise. JFrog (FROG) has a non-negative beta of 1.26.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Both FROG and QNT need 1-year volatility and 1-year return to plot risk-return positioning.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Quantinuum (QNT) has no ROE value reported for this period; JFrog (FROG) reports a negative figure of -2.26%, which needs context because negative ROE can reflect losses or negative shareholders’ equity.

JFrog (FROG) reports a negative net margin of -3.28%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Quantinuum (QNT) reports 0.00%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Both JFrog (FROG) at -0.27% and Quantinuum (QNT) at -6,939.56% report negative operating margin values, usually indicating operating losses over the period.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Quantinuum (QNT) at 34.61% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while JFrog (FROG) at 24.12% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for QNT.

Neither JFrog (FROG) nor Quantinuum (QNT) reports a EPS growth value for this period, so a direct comparison isn't possible.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

JFrog (FROG) at 2.15 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Quantinuum (QNT) at 15.49 sits above its industry’s typical mid-range — comfortable liquidity, though possibly with more idle current assets relative to peers.

Quantinuum (QNT) at 0.01 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while JFrog (FROG) at 0.11 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Neither JFrog (FROG) nor Quantinuum (QNT) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.

Neither JFrog (FROG) nor Quantinuum (QNT) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Neither JFrog (FROG) nor Quantinuum (QNT) reports a P/E ratio value for this period, so a direct comparison isn’t possible.

Investors are paying well above the peer range per dollar of sales for both JFrog (FROG) at 19.39 and Quantinuum (QNT) at 441.11 — each P/S ratio clears its industry’s benchmark range.

Both look rich against book: JFrog (FROG) at 12.37 sits in the upper P/B ratio quartile, and Quantinuum (QNT) at 64.89 prices even higher, above its industry range.

Valuation Metrics