FOUR vs. RBLX: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
Updated onHere’s a clear look at FOUR and RBLX, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.
Company Profile
| Symbol | FOUR | RBLX |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Shift4 Payments, Inc. | Roblox Corporation |
| Country | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Financials | Communication Services |
| GICS Industry | Financial Services | Entertainment |
| Market Capitalization | 6.95 billion USD | 93.63 billion USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | June 5, 2020 | March 10, 2021 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Historical Performance
This chart compares the performance of FOUR and RBLX by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Historical Performance at a Glance
| Symbol | FOUR | RBLX |
|---|---|---|
| 5-Day Price Return | -4.36% | 4.05% |
| 13-Week Price Return | -21.91% | 31.67% |
| 26-Week Price Return | -10.20% | 129.49% |
| 52-Week Price Return | -11.90% | 213.54% |
| Month-to-Date Return | -14.41% | 11.18% |
| Year-to-Date Return | -25.42% | 139.41% |
| 10-Day Avg. Volume | 2.51M | 7.33M |
| 3-Month Avg. Volume | 1.68M | 8.52M |
| 3-Month Volatility | 40.59% | 50.92% |
| Beta | 1.72 | 1.63 |
Profitability
Return on Equity (TTM)
FOUR
21.96%
Financial Services Industry
- Max
- 39.28%
- Q3
- 18.88%
- Median
- 9.97%
- Q1
- 4.03%
- Min
- -10.25%
In the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry, FOUR’s Return on Equity of 21.96% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.
RBLX
-354.27%
Entertainment Industry
- Max
- 42.50%
- Q3
- 24.06%
- Median
- 13.69%
- Q1
- 5.35%
- Min
- -17.95%
RBLX has a negative Return on Equity of -354.27%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.
Net Profit Margin (TTM)
FOUR
6.11%
Financial Services Industry
- Max
- 52.16%
- Q3
- 25.35%
- Median
- 12.68%
- Q1
- 6.11%
- Min
- -11.69%
FOUR’s Net Profit Margin of 6.11% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Financial Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.
RBLX
-23.67%
Entertainment Industry
- Max
- 45.33%
- Q3
- 24.40%
- Median
- 13.94%
- Q1
- 4.28%
- Min
- -23.67%
RBLX has a negative Net Profit Margin of -23.67%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)
FOUR
7.53%
Financial Services Industry
- Max
- 75.57%
- Q3
- 37.78%
- Median
- 19.09%
- Q1
- 10.04%
- Min
- -19.42%
FOUR’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.53% is in the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.
RBLX
-27.35%
Entertainment Industry
- Max
- 41.77%
- Q3
- 28.26%
- Median
- 16.13%
- Q1
- 8.03%
- Min
- -3.93%
RBLX has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -27.35%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.
Profitability at a Glance
| Symbol | FOUR | RBLX |
|---|---|---|
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 21.96% | -354.27% |
| Return on Assets (TTM) | 3.99% | -13.06% |
| Net Profit Margin (TTM) | 6.11% | -23.67% |
| Operating Profit Margin (TTM) | 7.53% | -27.35% |
| Gross Profit Margin (TTM) | 30.55% | 78.01% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
FOUR
2.53
Financial Services Industry
- Max
- 4.83
- Q3
- 2.70
- Median
- 1.44
- Q1
- 0.86
- Min
- 0.01
For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.
RBLX
0.97
Entertainment Industry
- Max
- 6.76
- Q3
- 4.02
- Median
- 1.55
- Q1
- 0.86
- Min
- 0.38
RBLX’s Current Ratio of 0.97 aligns with the median group of the Entertainment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)
FOUR
2.34
Financial Services Industry
- Max
- 5.07
- Q3
- 2.14
- Median
- 0.66
- Q1
- 0.12
- Min
- 0.00
The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.
RBLX
2.85
Entertainment Industry
- Max
- 1.54
- Q3
- 0.77
- Median
- 0.16
- Q1
- 0.02
- Min
- 0.00
With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.85, RBLX operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Entertainment industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)
FOUR
14.17
Financial Services Industry
- Max
- 136.23
- Q3
- 56.08
- Median
- 6.55
- Q1
- 2.01
- Min
- -33.27
The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.
RBLX
-845.00
Entertainment Industry
- Max
- 87.17
- Q3
- 35.59
- Median
- 7.06
- Q1
- 1.13
- Min
- -44.74
RBLX has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -845.00. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.
Financial Strength at a Glance
| Symbol | FOUR | RBLX |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 2.53 | 0.97 |
| Quick Ratio (MRQ) | 2.49 | 0.96 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) | 2.34 | 2.85 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 14.17 | -845.00 |
Growth
Revenue Growth
EPS Growth
Dividend
Dividend Yield (TTM)
FOUR
0.00%
Financial Services Industry
- Max
- 8.12%
- Q3
- 3.37%
- Median
- 1.70%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
FOUR currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.
RBLX
0.00%
Entertainment Industry
- Max
- 2.90%
- Q3
- 1.29%
- Median
- 0.59%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
RBLX currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
FOUR
0.00%
Financial Services Industry
- Max
- 132.10%
- Q3
- 64.32%
- Median
- 18.23%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
FOUR has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.
RBLX
0.00%
Entertainment Industry
- Max
- 82.30%
- Q3
- 38.45%
- Median
- 29.74%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
RBLX has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.
Dividend at a Glance
| Symbol | FOUR | RBLX |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Valuation
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)
FOUR
30.76
Financial Services Industry
- Max
- 45.81
- Q3
- 30.21
- Median
- 16.29
- Q1
- 10.14
- Min
- 0.70
A P/E Ratio of 30.76 places FOUR in the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.
RBLX
--
Entertainment Industry
- Max
- 92.09
- Q3
- 54.51
- Median
- 28.92
- Q1
- 19.75
- Min
- 2.96
P/E Ratio data for RBLX is currently unavailable.
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)
FOUR
1.88
Financial Services Industry
- Max
- 10.88
- Q3
- 5.34
- Median
- 2.64
- Q1
- 1.24
- Min
- 0.06
The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.
RBLX
23.10
Entertainment Industry
- Max
- 12.34
- Q3
- 7.67
- Median
- 5.06
- Q1
- 2.72
- Min
- 0.67
With a P/S Ratio of 23.10, RBLX trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Entertainment industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)
FOUR
5.45
Financial Services Industry
- Max
- 7.93
- Q3
- 3.78
- Median
- 1.49
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.08
FOUR’s P/B Ratio of 5.45 is in the upper tier for the Financial Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.
RBLX
202.01
Entertainment Industry
- Max
- 22.84
- Q3
- 10.54
- Median
- 6.60
- Q1
- 2.30
- Min
- 0.65
At 202.01, RBLX’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Entertainment industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.
Valuation at a Glance
| Symbol | FOUR | RBLX |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) | 30.76 | -- |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) | 1.88 | 23.10 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) | 5.45 | 202.01 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM) | 17.82 | 98.68 |