Seek Returns logo

FMS vs. VEEV: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FMS and VEEV, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

FMS trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, VEEV is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolFMSVEEV
Company NameFresenius Medical Care AGVeeva Systems Inc.
CountryGermanyUnited States
GICS SectorHealth CareHealth Care
GICS IndustryHealth Care Providers & ServicesHealth Care Technology
Market Capitalization14.58 billion USD45.62 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateSeptember 17, 1996October 16, 2013
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FMS and VEEV by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FMS vs. VEEV: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFMSVEEV
5-Day Price Return2.02%-0.21%
13-Week Price Return-17.32%15.63%
26-Week Price Return-11.70%16.60%
52-Week Price Return20.91%50.57%
Month-to-Date Return-7.06%-1.77%
Year-to-Date Return-6.39%32.78%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.64M1.02M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.56M1.40M
3-Month Volatility22.56%42.27%
Beta0.600.97

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FMS

4.70%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
26.03%
Q3
13.74%
Median
8.26%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-3.62%

FMS’s Return on Equity of 4.70% is on par with the norm for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

VEEV

13.74%

Health Care Technology Industry

Max
47.95%
Q3
35.17%
Median
13.74%
Q1
11.05%
Min
11.05%

VEEV’s Return on Equity of 13.74% is on par with the norm for the Health Care Technology industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

FMS vs. VEEV: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Health Care Technology industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FMS

3.36%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
12.40%
Q3
5.93%
Median
1.96%
Q1
0.93%
Min
-6.10%

FMS’s Net Profit Margin of 3.36% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

VEEV

27.34%

Health Care Technology Industry

Max
51.50%
Q3
45.32%
Median
27.34%
Q1
14.21%
Min
14.21%

VEEV’s Net Profit Margin of 27.34% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Health Care Technology industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

FMS vs. VEEV: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Health Care Technology industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FMS

7.57%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
19.05%
Q3
10.21%
Median
4.22%
Q1
1.98%
Min
-4.27%

FMS’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.57% is around the midpoint for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

VEEV

26.97%

Health Care Technology Industry

Max
73.15%
Q3
56.55%
Median
26.97%
Q1
22.10%
Min
22.10%

VEEV’s Operating Profit Margin of 26.97% is around the midpoint for the Health Care Technology industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

FMS vs. VEEV: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Health Care Technology industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFMSVEEV
Return on Equity (TTM)4.70%13.74%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.02%11.20%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.36%27.34%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)7.57%26.97%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)24.67%75.50%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FMS

1.44

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.01
Q3
1.49
Median
1.30
Q1
0.94
Min
0.17

FMS’s Current Ratio of 1.44 aligns with the median group of the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

VEEV

4.60

Health Care Technology Industry

Max
7.04
Q3
7.01
Median
4.60
Q1
2.96
Min
0.31

VEEV’s Current Ratio of 4.60 aligns with the median group of the Health Care Technology industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

FMS vs. VEEV: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Health Care Technology industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FMS

0.83

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.17
Q3
1.18
Median
0.74
Q1
0.45
Min
0.00

FMS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.83 is typical for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

VEEV

0.00

Health Care Technology Industry

Max
0.06
Q3
0.05
Median
0.01
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Health Care Technology industry, VEEV’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

FMS vs. VEEV: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Health Care Technology industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FMS

5.73

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
14.47
Q3
7.15
Median
5.45
Q1
2.04
Min
-4.44

FMS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.73 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

VEEV

169.00

Health Care Technology Industry

Max
224.12
Q3
222.84
Median
219.00
Q1
181.50
Min
169.00

In the lower quartile for the Health Care Technology industry, VEEV’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 169.00 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

FMS vs. VEEV: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Health Care Technology industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFMSVEEV
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.444.60
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.084.54
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.830.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)5.73169.00

Growth

Revenue Growth

FMS vs. VEEV: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FMS vs. VEEV: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FMS

3.48%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
5.38%
Q3
2.22%
Median
0.55%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.48%, FMS offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Health Care Providers & Services industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

VEEV

0.00%

Health Care Technology Industry

Max
1.12%
Q3
0.62%
Median
0.12%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VEEV currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

FMS vs. VEEV: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Health Care Technology industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FMS

187.56%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
186.69%
Q3
74.82%
Median
26.76%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

At 187.56%, FMS’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

VEEV

0.00%

Health Care Technology Industry

Max
101.92%
Q3
72.22%
Median
42.51%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VEEV has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

FMS vs. VEEV: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Health Care Technology industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFMSVEEV
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.48%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)187.56%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FMS

18.48

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
55.89
Q3
30.85
Median
21.17
Q1
12.63
Min
0.00

FMS’s P/E Ratio of 18.48 is within the middle range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

VEEV

58.22

Health Care Technology Industry

Max
343.51
Q3
272.61
Median
54.67
Q1
36.04
Min
31.57

VEEV’s P/E Ratio of 58.22 is within the middle range for the Health Care Technology industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FMS vs. VEEV: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Health Care Technology industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FMS

0.62

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
3.10
Q3
1.74
Median
0.67
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

FMS’s P/S Ratio of 0.62 aligns with the market consensus for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

VEEV

15.92

Health Care Technology Industry

Max
176.90
Q3
98.12
Median
16.38
Q1
4.49
Min
0.00

VEEV’s P/S Ratio of 15.92 aligns with the market consensus for the Health Care Technology industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

FMS vs. VEEV: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Health Care Technology industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FMS

1.07

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
7.61
Q3
4.32
Median
2.53
Q1
1.14
Min
0.77

FMS’s P/B Ratio of 1.07 is in the lower quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

VEEV

6.13

Health Care Technology Industry

Max
117.60
Q3
90.72
Median
8.09
Q1
3.83
Min
3.06

VEEV’s P/B Ratio of 6.13 is within the conventional range for the Health Care Technology industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

FMS vs. VEEV: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Health Care Technology industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFMSVEEV
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)18.4858.22
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.6215.92
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.076.13
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)6.0238.33