FMS vs. UHS: Fresenius Medical Care vs. Universal Health Services Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Fresenius Medical Care (FMS) and Universal Health Services (UHS) both belong to the Health Care Providers & Services industry, though FMS is classified under Health Care Services while UHS falls under Health Care Facilities.

Universal Health Services (UHS) trades as ordinary local shares, while Fresenius Medical Care (FMS) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Universal Health Services (UHS) at 19.74% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Fresenius Medical Care (FMS) at 7.84% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for UHS.

Both Fresenius Medical Care (FMS) at 4.22% and Universal Health Services (UHS) at 7.97% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

Both Fresenius Medical Care (FMS) at 9.63% and Universal Health Services (UHS) at 9.60% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Universal Health Services (UHS) at 9.71% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Fresenius Medical Care (FMS) at 1.51% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Both Fresenius Medical Care (FMS) at 83.61% and Universal Health Services (UHS) at 37.34% sit in the top peer quartile for EPS growth, so each is compounding per-share earnings faster than typical industry peers.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Universal Health Services (UHS) at 1.37 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Fresenius Medical Care (FMS) at 0.99 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for FMS.

Both Fresenius Medical Care (FMS) at 0.79 and Universal Health Services (UHS) at 0.80 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Both Fresenius Medical Care (FMS) at 6.30% and Universal Health Services (UHS) at 0.10% yield above their industries’ entire benchmark ranges — high enough that dividend safety, not income, becomes the first question.

Both Fresenius Medical Care (FMS) at 50.14% and Universal Health Services (UHS) at 3.35% pay out more of their earnings than any of their industry peers — the thinnest cover in their groups, so dividend headroom deserves attention.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Both Fresenius Medical Care (FMS) at 13.53 and Universal Health Services (UHS) at 8.18 sit in the cheaper earnings-multiple quartile for P/E ratio, with the market paying less for a dollar of trailing earnings than it pays for typical peers.

Both Fresenius Medical Care (FMS) at 0.62 and Universal Health Services (UHS) at 0.63 fetch a relatively low price per dollar of sales, landing in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile of their industries.

Relative to net asset value, both Fresenius Medical Care (FMS) at 0.85 and Universal Health Services (UHS) at 1.51 look inexpensive, sitting in the lower P/B ratio quartile of their industries.

Valuation Metrics