FMS vs. PHG: Fresenius Medical Care vs. Koninklijke Philips Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Fresenius Medical Care (FMS) and Koninklijke Philips (PHG) both fall under the Health Care Equipment & Services industry group, but FMS is classified in Health Care Providers & Services while PHG is classified in Health Care Equipment & Supplies.

Both Fresenius Medical Care (FMS) and Koninklijke Philips (PHG) trade as ADRs — their core financials are comparable, but keep FX, depositary-program fees, and dividend withholding in view for each.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Both Fresenius Medical Care (FMS) at 7.84% and Koninklijke Philips (PHG) at 8.61% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Both Fresenius Medical Care (FMS) at 4.22% and Koninklijke Philips (PHG) at 5.39% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

Both Fresenius Medical Care (FMS) at 9.63% and Koninklijke Philips (PHG) at 3.76% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Both Fresenius Medical Care (FMS) at 1.51% and Koninklijke Philips (PHG) at -1.04% post bottom-quartile revenue growth versus peers, pointing to weaker demand or pricing momentum than typical rivals.

Only one side can be read here: Fresenius Medical Care (FMS) reports EPS growth of 83.61%, ranked against its industry; Koninklijke Philips (PHG) has no EPS growth figure this period.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Both Fresenius Medical Care (FMS) at 0.99 and Koninklijke Philips (PHG) at 1.33 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.

Both Fresenius Medical Care (FMS) at 0.79 and Koninklijke Philips (PHG) at 0.70 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Koninklijke Philips (PHG) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Fresenius Medical Care (FMS) reports a yield of 6.30%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Koninklijke Philips (PHG) reports payout ratio above 100% at 211.79%, meaning dividends exceeded current-period earnings and sustainability needs extra context. Meanwhile Fresenius Medical Care (FMS) reports 50.14%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Fresenius Medical Care (FMS) at 13.53 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Koninklijke Philips (PHG) at 63.23 sits in the richer quartile — a clear split in what investors pay for each dollar of trailing earnings.

Fresenius Medical Care (FMS) at 0.62 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Koninklijke Philips (PHG) at 1.67 prices around its industry’s middle — FMS costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.

Fresenius Medical Care (FMS) at 0.85 sits in the lower P/B ratio quartile against book while Koninklijke Philips (PHG) at 2.28 is valued near its industry’s middle — FMS is cheaper on assets, though weigh it against ROE and asset quality.

Valuation Metrics