Seek Returns logo

FLUT vs. RACE: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FLUT and RACE, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolFLUTRACE
Company NameFlutter Entertainment plcFerrari N.V.
CountryUnited StatesItaly
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryHotels, Restaurants & LeisureAutomobiles
Market Capitalization51.64 billion USD80.41 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateOctober 4, 2002October 21, 2015
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FLUT and RACE by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FLUT vs. RACE: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFLUTRACE
5-Day Price Return-4.04%1.22%
13-Week Price Return18.80%-13.32%
26-Week Price Return10.37%-14.60%
52-Week Price Return55.99%-0.99%
Month-to-Date Return-2.83%-0.88%
Year-to-Date Return13.65%-7.40%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.66M0.56M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.55M0.34M
3-Month Volatility32.59%30.88%
Beta1.171.04

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FLUT

5.32%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
83.01%
Q3
39.51%
Median
17.38%
Q1
5.32%
Min
-45.92%

FLUT’s Return on Equity of 5.32% is on par with the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

RACE

45.61%

Automobiles Industry

Max
25.70%
Q3
12.88%
Median
6.92%
Q1
0.71%
Min
-15.89%

RACE’s Return on Equity of 45.61% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Automobiles industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

FLUT vs. RACE: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FLUT

3.65%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.45%
Q3
14.67%
Median
8.69%
Q1
3.34%
Min
-11.30%

FLUT’s Net Profit Margin of 3.65% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

RACE

22.91%

Automobiles Industry

Max
9.92%
Q3
5.78%
Median
3.23%
Q1
0.11%
Min
-5.31%

RACE’s Net Profit Margin of 22.91% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Automobiles industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

FLUT vs. RACE: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FLUT

6.71%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
38.76%
Q3
21.15%
Median
14.20%
Q1
6.43%
Min
-14.56%

FLUT’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.71% is around the midpoint for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

RACE

29.16%

Automobiles Industry

Max
13.07%
Q3
7.22%
Median
5.29%
Q1
0.43%
Min
-4.46%

RACE’s Operating Profit Margin of 29.16% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Automobiles industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

FLUT vs. RACE: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFLUTRACE
Return on Equity (TTM)5.32%45.61%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.11%16.76%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.65%22.91%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)6.71%29.16%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)47.55%51.20%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FLUT

0.95

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
2.68
Q3
1.62
Median
1.11
Q1
0.74
Min
0.19

FLUT’s Current Ratio of 0.95 aligns with the median group of the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

RACE

2.08

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.19
Q3
1.54
Median
1.26
Q1
1.09
Min
0.48

RACE’s Current Ratio of 2.08 is in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

FLUT vs. RACE: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FLUT

0.69

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
9.88
Q3
4.54
Median
1.52
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

FLUT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.69 is typical for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

RACE

0.89

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.34
Q3
1.13
Median
0.58
Q1
0.28
Min
0.06

RACE’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.89 is typical for the Automobiles industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

FLUT vs. RACE: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FLUT

1.02

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.88
Q3
11.95
Median
3.87
Q1
1.19
Min
-11.84

In the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, FLUT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.02 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

RACE

181.49

Automobiles Industry

Max
77.87
Q3
42.86
Median
13.88
Q1
2.13
Min
-49.07

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 181.49, RACE demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Automobiles industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

FLUT vs. RACE: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFLUTRACE
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.952.08
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.881.61
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.690.89
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)1.02181.49

Growth

Revenue Growth

FLUT vs. RACE: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FLUT vs. RACE: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FLUT

0.00%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
5.88%
Q3
2.37%
Median
0.68%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FLUT currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

RACE

0.70%

Automobiles Industry

Max
10.71%
Q3
5.39%
Median
3.14%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

RACE’s Dividend Yield of 0.70% is consistent with its peers in the Automobiles industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

FLUT vs. RACE: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FLUT

0.00%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
127.31%
Q3
56.79%
Median
19.58%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FLUT has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

RACE

44.33%

Automobiles Industry

Max
114.43%
Q3
59.30%
Median
37.15%
Q1
16.40%
Min
0.00%

RACE’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 44.33% is within the typical range for the Automobiles industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

FLUT vs. RACE: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFLUTRACE
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.70%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%44.33%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FLUT

99.19

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
59.44
Q3
33.98
Median
22.25
Q1
15.53
Min
7.61

At 99.19, FLUT’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

RACE

46.68

Automobiles Industry

Max
27.69
Q3
19.99
Median
9.85
Q1
6.60
Min
4.25

At 46.68, RACE’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Automobiles industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

FLUT vs. RACE: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FLUT

3.62

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
7.74
Q3
3.88
Median
2.05
Q1
1.19
Min
0.17

FLUT’s P/S Ratio of 3.62 aligns with the market consensus for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

RACE

10.70

Automobiles Industry

Max
1.52
Q3
0.84
Median
0.41
Q1
0.23
Min
0.08

With a P/S Ratio of 10.70, RACE trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Automobiles industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

FLUT vs. RACE: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FLUT

3.98

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
20.90
Q3
9.78
Median
4.29
Q1
2.22
Min
0.47

FLUT’s P/B Ratio of 3.98 is within the conventional range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

RACE

22.78

Automobiles Industry

Max
4.25
Q3
2.00
Median
0.87
Q1
0.46
Min
0.19

At 22.78, RACE’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Automobiles industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

FLUT vs. RACE: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFLUTRACE
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)99.1946.68
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.6210.70
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.9822.78
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)61.3554.76