Seek Returns logo

FLUT vs. FND: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FLUT and FND, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolFLUTFND
Company NameFlutter Entertainment plcFloor & Decor Holdings, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryHotels, Restaurants & LeisureSpecialty Retail
Market Capitalization48.96 billion USD8.19 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateOctober 4, 2002April 27, 2017
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FLUT and FND by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FLUT vs. FND: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFLUTFND
5-Day Price Return-9.53%-7.27%
13-Week Price Return-11.36%-2.98%
26-Week Price Return6.38%-10.96%
52-Week Price Return6.38%-39.97%
Month-to-Date Return-0.62%-10.03%
Year-to-Date Return-2.33%-26.08%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.38M2.13M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.45M1.99M
3-Month Volatility32.47%49.00%
Beta1.211.73

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FLUT

3.70%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
84.03%
Q3
40.12%
Median
17.38%
Q1
7.45%
Min
-33.94%

FLUT’s Return on Equity of 3.70% is in the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

FND

9.60%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
64.63%
Q3
37.13%
Median
19.07%
Q1
10.79%
Min
-16.66%

FND’s Return on Equity of 9.60% is in the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

FLUT vs. FND: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FLUT

2.46%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
25.61%
Q3
14.65%
Median
8.66%
Q1
3.36%
Min
-9.83%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, FLUT’s Net Profit Margin of 2.46% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

FND

4.59%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
21.04%
Q3
10.99%
Median
6.08%
Q1
2.46%
Min
-4.37%

FND’s Net Profit Margin of 4.59% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Specialty Retail industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

FLUT vs. FND: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FLUT

6.53%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
45.80%
Q3
22.44%
Median
14.98%
Q1
6.59%
Min
-15.28%

FLUT’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.53% is in the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

FND

5.91%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
33.35%
Q3
16.40%
Median
9.28%
Q1
4.05%
Min
-10.63%

FND’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.91% is around the midpoint for the Specialty Retail industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

FLUT vs. FND: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFLUTFND
Return on Equity (TTM)3.70%9.60%
Return on Assets (TTM)1.40%4.07%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)2.46%4.59%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)6.53%5.91%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)46.94%43.65%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FLUT

0.95

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
2.73
Q3
1.63
Median
1.12
Q1
0.73
Min
0.18

FLUT’s Current Ratio of 0.95 aligns with the median group of the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

FND

1.25

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
2.72
Q3
1.81
Median
1.38
Q1
1.15
Min
0.52

FND’s Current Ratio of 1.25 aligns with the median group of the Specialty Retail industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

FLUT vs. FND: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FLUT

0.97

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
11.29
Q3
4.71
Median
1.65
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

FLUT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.97 is typical for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

FND

0.09

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
3.44
Q3
1.57
Median
0.60
Q1
0.22
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, FND’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.09 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

FLUT vs. FND: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FLUT

1.02

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
21.72
Q3
11.40
Median
4.02
Q1
1.19
Min
-11.84

In the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, FLUT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.02 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

FND

92.38

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
48.12
Q3
39.12
Median
14.13
Q1
3.63
Min
-36.00

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 92.38, FND demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Specialty Retail industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

FLUT vs. FND: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFLUTFND
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.951.25
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.890.23
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.970.09
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)1.0292.38

Growth

Revenue Growth

FLUT vs. FND: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FLUT vs. FND: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FLUT

0.00%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
6.81%
Q3
2.73%
Median
0.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FLUT currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

FND

0.00%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
6.48%
Q3
2.84%
Median
1.04%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FND currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

FLUT vs. FND: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FLUT

0.00%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
128.39%
Q3
61.60%
Median
21.91%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FLUT has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

FND

0.00%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
192.64%
Q3
79.43%
Median
26.55%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FND has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

FLUT vs. FND: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFLUTFND
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FLUT

123.10

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
56.96
Q3
33.82
Median
21.30
Q1
15.75
Min
6.06

At 123.10, FLUT’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

FND

36.90

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
47.04
Q3
27.74
Median
23.51
Q1
13.77
Min
7.47

A P/E Ratio of 36.90 places FND in the upper quartile for the Specialty Retail industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

FLUT vs. FND: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FLUT

3.03

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
7.19
Q3
3.99
Median
1.93
Q1
1.26
Min
0.17

FLUT’s P/S Ratio of 3.03 aligns with the market consensus for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

FND

1.69

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
5.77
Q3
2.79
Median
1.21
Q1
0.53
Min
0.09

FND’s P/S Ratio of 1.69 aligns with the market consensus for the Specialty Retail industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

FLUT vs. FND: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FLUT

4.93

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
24.89
Q3
11.60
Median
4.91
Q1
2.29
Min
0.37

FLUT’s P/B Ratio of 4.93 is within the conventional range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

FND

3.55

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
16.93
Q3
7.92
Median
3.98
Q1
1.86
Min
0.55

FND’s P/B Ratio of 3.55 is within the conventional range for the Specialty Retail industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

FLUT vs. FND: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFLUTFND
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)123.1036.90
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.031.69
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.933.55
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)54.3562.39