Seek Returns

FLS vs. WWD: Flowserve vs. Woodward Stock Comparison

How do Flowserve (FLS) and Woodward (WWD) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Flowserve (FLS) and Woodward (WWD) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but FLS is classified in Machinery while WWD is classified in Aerospace & Defense.

Company profile comparison for Flowserve (FLS) and Woodward (WWD)
Profile ItemFLSWWD
NameFlowserve CorporationWoodward, Inc.
Country/RegionUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS Industry GroupCapital GoodsCapital Goods
GICS IndustryMachineryAerospace & Defense
GICS Sub-IndustryIndustrial Machinery & Supplies & ComponentsAerospace & Defense
Market Capitalization10.19 billion USD18.74 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENasdaq
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980April 4, 1994
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

FLS
WWD
GSPC
Loading price history…
Flowserve (FLS) vs. Woodward (WWD), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for Flowserve (FLS) and Woodward (WWD). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for Flowserve (FLS) and Woodward (WWD). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Flowserve (FLS) and Woodward (WWD)
MetricFLSWWD
Total Return (1Y)24.11%25.66%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)33.68%36.83%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)22.48%23.54%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

FLS
WWD
GSPC
Loading price history…
Flowserve (FLS) vs. Woodward (WWD), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for Flowserve (FLS) and Woodward (WWD). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Flowserve (FLS) and Woodward (WWD)
MetricFLSWWD
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)42.18%40.29%
Beta (5Y)1.240.87
Max Drawdown (5Y)-38.76%-37.25%
Avg. Volume (3M)1.61M665.85K

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
FLS and WWD are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Flowserve (FLS) and Woodward (WWD)
MetricFLSWWD
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)0.470.53
Sortino Ratio (1Y)0.700.85

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Woodward (WWD) at 22.34% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Flowserve (FLS) at 11.61% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for WWD.

FLS

Capital Goods industry group

11.61%

Max
40.55%
Q3
19.29%
Median
12.12%
FLS
11.61%
Q1
4.08%
Min
-17.12%

WWD

Capital Goods industry group

22.34%

Max
40.55%
WWD
22.34%
Q3
19.29%
Median
12.12%
Q1
4.08%
Min
-17.12%
Loading chart…
Flowserve (FLS) vs. Woodward (WWD): A comparison of their ROE against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Woodward (WWD) at 13.17% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Flowserve (FLS) at 5.42%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

FLS

Capital Goods industry group

5.42%

Max
27.47%
Q3
12.10%
Median
6.30%
FLS
5.42%
Q1
1.40%
Min
-12.89%

WWD

Capital Goods industry group

13.17%

Max
27.47%
WWD
13.17%
Q3
12.10%
Median
6.30%
Q1
1.40%
Min
-12.89%
Loading chart…
Flowserve (FLS) vs. Woodward (WWD): A comparison of their net margin against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both Flowserve (FLS) at 13.45% and Woodward (WWD) at 17.76% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

FLS

Capital Goods industry group

13.45%

Max
36.60%
Q3
18.33%
FLS
13.45%
Median
11.12%
Q1
5.14%
Min
-12.63%

WWD

Capital Goods industry group

17.76%

Max
36.60%
Q3
18.33%
WWD
17.76%
Median
11.12%
Q1
5.14%
Min
-12.63%
Loading chart…
Flowserve (FLS) vs. Woodward (WWD): A comparison of their operating margin against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Flowserve (FLS) and Woodward (WWD)
MetricFLSWWD
ROE (TTM)11.61%22.34%
ROA (TTM)6.36%8.62%
Net Margin (TTM)5.42%13.17%
Operating Margin (TTM)13.45%17.76%
Gross Margin (TTM)35.30%29.63%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Both Flowserve (FLS) at 3.76% and Woodward (WWD) at 7.30% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Loading chart…
Flowserve (FLS) vs. Woodward (WWD): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Both Flowserve (FLS) at 23.36% and Woodward (WWD) at 19.63% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Loading chart…
Flowserve (FLS) vs. Woodward (WWD): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Flowserve (FLS) and Woodward (WWD)
MetricFLSWWD
Revenue Growth (YoY)3.76%7.30%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)9.37%14.40%
EPS Growth (YoY)23.36%19.63%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)22.39%38.44%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Both Flowserve (FLS) at 2.10 and Woodward (WWD) at 1.65 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.

FLS

Capital Goods industry group

2.10

Max
5.22
Q3
2.95
FLS
2.10
Median
2.08
Q1
1.43
Min
0.36

WWD

Capital Goods industry group

1.65

Max
5.22
Q3
2.95
Median
2.08
WWD
1.65
Q1
1.43
Min
0.36
Loading chart…
Flowserve (FLS) vs. Woodward (WWD): A comparison of their current ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Both Flowserve (FLS) at 0.95 and Woodward (WWD) at 0.56 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.

FLS

Capital Goods industry group

0.95

Max
2.33
Q3
1.12
FLS
0.95
Median
0.60
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00

WWD

Capital Goods industry group

0.56

Max
2.33
Q3
1.12
Median
0.60
WWD
0.56
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Flowserve (FLS) vs. Woodward (WWD): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Flowserve (FLS) and Woodward (WWD)
MetricFLSWWD
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.101.65
Debt / Equity (MRQ)0.950.56
Net Debt / EBITDA2.081.13

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both Flowserve (FLS) at 1.11% and Woodward (WWD) at 0.32% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

FLS

Capital Goods industry group

1.11%

Max
2.66%
Q3
1.14%
FLS
1.11%
Median
0.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

WWD

Capital Goods industry group

0.32%

Max
2.66%
Q3
1.14%
WWD
0.32%
Median
0.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Flowserve (FLS) vs. Woodward (WWD): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Woodward (WWD) at 13.35% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Flowserve (FLS) at 43.50% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.

FLS

Capital Goods industry group

43.50%

Max
67.39%
FLS
43.50%
Q3
28.02%
Median
6.86%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

WWD

Capital Goods industry group

13.35%

Max
67.39%
Q3
28.02%
WWD
13.35%
Median
6.86%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Flowserve (FLS) vs. Woodward (WWD): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Flowserve (FLS) and Woodward (WWD)
MetricFLSWWD
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.11%0.32%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)43.50%13.35%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Woodward (WWD) at 35.30 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Flowserve (FLS) at 40.19 sits in the richer quartile — FLS needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.

FLS

Capital Goods industry group

40.19

Max
59.38
FLS
40.19
Q3
35.92
Median
25.41
Q1
19.47
Min
3.03

WWD

Capital Goods industry group

35.30

Max
59.38
Q3
35.92
WWD
35.30
Median
25.41
Q1
19.47
Min
3.03
Loading chart…
Flowserve (FLS) vs. Woodward (WWD): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Flowserve (FLS) at 2.17 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Woodward (WWD) at 4.47 sits in the pricier quartile — WWD costs more per dollar of sales.

FLS

Capital Goods industry group

2.17

Max
7.54
Q3
3.76
FLS
2.17
Median
2.15
Q1
1.03
Min
0.03

WWD

Capital Goods industry group

4.47

Max
7.54
WWD
4.47
Q3
3.76
Median
2.15
Q1
1.03
Min
0.03
Loading chart…
Flowserve (FLS) vs. Woodward (WWD): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Flowserve (FLS) at 4.40 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Woodward (WWD) at 7.60 carries an above-peer premium to book — WWD is pricier on assets.

FLS

Capital Goods industry group

4.40

Max
9.66
Q3
5.00
FLS
4.40
Median
3.12
Q1
1.81
Min
-1.08

WWD

Capital Goods industry group

7.60

Max
9.66
WWD
7.60
Q3
5.00
Median
3.12
Q1
1.81
Min
-1.08
Loading chart…
Flowserve (FLS) vs. Woodward (WWD): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Flowserve (FLS) and Woodward (WWD)
MetricFLSWWD
P/E Ratio (TTM)40.1935.30
P/S Ratio (TTM)2.174.47
P/B Ratio (MRQ)4.407.60
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)3.62%1.00%