Seek Returns

FLS vs. SYM: Flowserve vs. Symbotic Stock Comparison

How do Flowserve (FLS) and Symbotic (SYM) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Flowserve (FLS) and Symbotic (SYM) are both classified in the Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components sub-industry within the broader Machinery industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

Flowserve (FLS) has more than two decades of public-market history since March 17, 1980, whereas Symbotic (SYM) listed on March 9, 2021 and has a much shorter record to draw on.

Company profile comparison for Flowserve (FLS) and Symbotic (SYM)
Profile ItemFLSSYM
NameFlowserve CorporationSymbotic Inc. Class A Common Stock
Country/RegionUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS Industry GroupCapital GoodsCapital Goods
GICS IndustryMachineryMachinery
GICS Sub-IndustryIndustrial Machinery & Supplies & ComponentsIndustrial Machinery & Supplies & Components
Market Capitalization10.19 billion USD22.29 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENasdaq
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980March 9, 2021
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

FLS
SYM
GSPC
Loading price history…
Flowserve (FLS) vs. Symbotic (SYM), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for Flowserve (FLS) and Symbotic (SYM). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for Flowserve (FLS) and Symbotic (SYM). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Flowserve (FLS) and Symbotic (SYM)
MetricFLSSYM
Total Return (1Y)24.11%-44.66%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)33.68%6.78%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)22.48%30.90%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

FLS
SYM
GSPC
Loading price history…
Flowserve (FLS) vs. Symbotic (SYM), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for Flowserve (FLS) and Symbotic (SYM). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Symbotic (SYM) carries a highly aggressive beta of 2.05, indicating much higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, whereas Flowserve (FLS) is closer to market-like at 1.24 — a noticeable difference in market-sensitivity profile.

Risk profile metrics for Flowserve (FLS) and Symbotic (SYM)
MetricFLSSYM
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)42.18%78.15%
Beta (5Y)1.242.05
Max Drawdown (5Y)-38.76%-72.46%
Avg. Volume (3M)1.61M1.61M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
FLS and SYM are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Flowserve (FLS) and Symbotic (SYM)
MetricFLSSYM
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)0.47-0.63
Sortino Ratio (1Y)0.70-0.93

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Both Flowserve (FLS) at 11.61% and Symbotic (SYM) at 4.39% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

FLS

Capital Goods industry group

11.61%

Max
40.55%
Q3
19.29%
Median
12.12%
FLS
11.61%
Q1
4.08%
Min
-17.12%

SYM

Capital Goods industry group

4.39%

Max
40.55%
Q3
19.29%
Median
12.12%
SYM
4.39%
Q1
4.08%
Min
-17.12%
Loading chart…
Flowserve (FLS) vs. Symbotic (SYM): A comparison of their ROE against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Flowserve (FLS) at 5.42% keeps about the industry-typical share of revenue as profit, while Symbotic (SYM) at 0.31% retains only a bottom-quartile share.

FLS

Capital Goods industry group

5.42%

Max
27.47%
Q3
12.10%
Median
6.30%
FLS
5.42%
Q1
1.40%
Min
-12.89%

SYM

Capital Goods industry group

0.31%

Max
27.47%
Q3
12.10%
Median
6.30%
Q1
1.40%
SYM
0.31%
Min
-12.89%
Loading chart…
Flowserve (FLS) vs. Symbotic (SYM): A comparison of their net margin against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Flowserve (FLS) at 13.45% runs core operations around its industry’s norm, while Symbotic (SYM) at 4.59% operates in the bottom quartile.

FLS

Capital Goods industry group

13.45%

Max
36.60%
Q3
18.33%
FLS
13.45%
Median
11.12%
Q1
5.14%
Min
-12.63%

SYM

Capital Goods industry group

4.59%

Max
36.60%
Q3
18.33%
Median
11.12%
Q1
5.14%
SYM
4.59%
Min
-12.63%
Loading chart…
Flowserve (FLS) vs. Symbotic (SYM): A comparison of their operating margin against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Flowserve (FLS) and Symbotic (SYM)
MetricFLSSYM
ROE (TTM)11.61%4.39%
ROA (TTM)6.36%0.32%
Net Margin (TTM)5.42%0.31%
Operating Margin (TTM)13.45%4.59%
Gross Margin (TTM)35.30%21.27%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Symbotic (SYM) at 25.65% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Flowserve (FLS) at 3.76% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for SYM.

Loading chart…
Flowserve (FLS) vs. Symbotic (SYM): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Only one side can be read here: Flowserve (FLS) reports EPS growth of 23.36%, ranked against its industry; Symbotic (SYM) has no EPS growth figure this period.

Loading chart…
Flowserve (FLS) vs. Symbotic (SYM): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Flowserve (FLS) and Symbotic (SYM)
MetricFLSSYM
Revenue Growth (YoY)3.76%25.65%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)9.37%55.87%
EPS Growth (YoY)23.36%--
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)22.39%--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Flowserve (FLS) at 2.10 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Symbotic (SYM) at 1.33 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for SYM.

FLS

Capital Goods industry group

2.10

Max
5.22
Q3
2.95
FLS
2.10
Median
2.08
Q1
1.43
Min
0.36

SYM

Capital Goods industry group

1.33

Max
5.22
Q3
2.95
Median
2.08
Q1
1.43
SYM
1.33
Min
0.36
Loading chart…
Flowserve (FLS) vs. Symbotic (SYM): A comparison of their current ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Symbotic (SYM) at 0.02 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Flowserve (FLS) at 0.95 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.

FLS

Capital Goods industry group

0.95

Max
2.33
Q3
1.12
FLS
0.95
Median
0.60
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00

SYM

Capital Goods industry group

0.02

Max
2.33
Q3
1.12
Median
0.60
Q1
0.29
SYM
0.02
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Flowserve (FLS) vs. Symbotic (SYM): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Flowserve (FLS) and Symbotic (SYM)
MetricFLSSYM
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.101.33
Debt / Equity (MRQ)0.950.02
Net Debt / EBITDA2.08-30.44

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Symbotic (SYM) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Flowserve (FLS) reports a yield of 1.11%, ranking against industry peers normally.

FLS

Capital Goods industry group

1.11%

Max
2.66%
Q3
1.14%
FLS
1.11%
Median
0.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SYM

Capital Goods industry group

0.00%

Max
2.66%
Q3
1.14%
Median
0.24%
SYM
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Flowserve (FLS) vs. Symbotic (SYM): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Symbotic (SYM) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Flowserve (FLS) reports a payout of 43.50%, ranking against industry peers normally.

FLS

Capital Goods industry group

43.50%

Max
67.39%
FLS
43.50%
Q3
28.02%
Median
6.86%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SYM

Capital Goods industry group

0.00%

Max
67.39%
Q3
28.02%
Median
6.86%
SYM
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Flowserve (FLS) vs. Symbotic (SYM): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Flowserve (FLS) and Symbotic (SYM)
MetricFLSSYM
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.11%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)43.50%0.00%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Both look expensive on trailing earnings: Flowserve (FLS) at 40.19 sits in the richer P/E ratio quartile, and Symbotic (SYM) at 460.25 is richer still, above its industry range.

FLS

Capital Goods industry group

40.19

Max
59.38
FLS
40.19
Q3
35.92
Median
25.41
Q1
19.47
Min
3.03

SYM

Capital Goods industry group

460.25

SYM
460.25
Max
59.38
Q3
35.92
Median
25.41
Q1
19.47
Min
3.03
Loading chart…
Flowserve (FLS) vs. Symbotic (SYM): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Flowserve (FLS) at 2.17 prices around its industry’s typical P/S ratio, while Symbotic (SYM) at 8.42 clears its benchmark range — SYM looks notably rich on sales.

FLS

Capital Goods industry group

2.17

Max
7.54
Q3
3.76
FLS
2.17
Median
2.15
Q1
1.03
Min
0.03

SYM

Capital Goods industry group

8.42

SYM
8.42
Max
7.54
Q3
3.76
Median
2.15
Q1
1.03
Min
0.03
Loading chart…
Flowserve (FLS) vs. Symbotic (SYM): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Flowserve (FLS) at 4.40 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Symbotic (SYM) at 6.70 carries an above-peer premium to book — SYM is pricier on assets.

FLS

Capital Goods industry group

4.40

Max
9.66
Q3
5.00
FLS
4.40
Median
3.12
Q1
1.81
Min
-1.08

SYM

Capital Goods industry group

6.70

Max
9.66
SYM
6.70
Q3
5.00
Median
3.12
Q1
1.81
Min
-1.08
Loading chart…
Flowserve (FLS) vs. Symbotic (SYM): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Flowserve (FLS) and Symbotic (SYM)
MetricFLSSYM
P/E Ratio (TTM)40.19460.25
P/S Ratio (TTM)2.178.42
P/B Ratio (MRQ)4.406.70
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)3.62%2.46%