FLS vs. ROK: Flowserve vs. Rockwell Automation Stock Comparison
How do Flowserve (FLS) and Rockwell Automation (ROK) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Flowserve (FLS) and Rockwell Automation (ROK) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but FLS is classified in Machinery while ROK is classified in Electrical Equipment.
| Profile Item | FLS | ROK |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Flowserve Corporation | Rockwell Automation Inc. |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| GICS Industry | Machinery | Electrical Equipment |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components | Electrical Components & Equipment |
| Market Capitalization | 10.19 billion USD | 41.82 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | March 17, 1980 | December 31, 1981 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | FLS | ROK |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 24.11% | 6.19% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 33.68% | 16.94% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 22.48% | 4.86% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | FLS | ROK |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 42.18% | 34.28% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.24 | 1.54 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -38.76% | -45.09% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 1.61M | 799.28K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | FLS | ROK |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.47 | 0.06 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 0.70 | 0.07 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Rockwell Automation (ROK) at 38.73% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Flowserve (FLS) at 11.61% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for ROK.
FLS
Capital Goods industry group
11.61%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- FLS
- 11.61%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
ROK
Capital Goods industry group
38.73%
- Max
- 40.55%
- ROK
- 38.73%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
Net Margin (TTM)
Rockwell Automation (ROK) at 15.68% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Flowserve (FLS) at 5.42%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
FLS
Capital Goods industry group
5.42%
- Max
- 27.47%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- FLS
- 5.42%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
ROK
Capital Goods industry group
15.68%
- Max
- 27.47%
- ROK
- 15.68%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Flowserve (FLS) at 13.45% and Rockwell Automation (ROK) at 14.75% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
FLS
Capital Goods industry group
13.45%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- FLS
- 13.45%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
ROK
Capital Goods industry group
14.75%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- ROK
- 14.75%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | FLS | ROK |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 11.61% | 38.73% |
| ROA (TTM) | 6.36% | 9.32% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 5.42% | 15.68% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 13.45% | 14.75% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 35.30% | 48.95% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Only one side can be read here: Flowserve (FLS) reports revenue growth of 3.76%, ranked against its industry; Rockwell Automation (ROK) has no revenue growth figure this period.
EPS Growth
Rockwell Automation (ROK) at 63.49% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Flowserve (FLS) at 23.36% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for ROK.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | FLS | ROK |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 3.76% | -- |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 9.37% | -- |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 23.36% | 63.49% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 22.39% | 1.62% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Flowserve (FLS) at 2.10 and Rockwell Automation (ROK) at 2.11 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.
FLS
Capital Goods industry group
2.10
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- FLS
- 2.10
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- Min
- 0.36
ROK
Capital Goods industry group
2.11
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- ROK
- 2.11
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- Min
- 0.36
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both Flowserve (FLS) at 0.95 and Rockwell Automation (ROK) at 1.00 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
FLS
Capital Goods industry group
0.95
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- FLS
- 0.95
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
ROK
Capital Goods industry group
1.00
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- ROK
- 1.00
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | FLS | ROK |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 2.10 | 2.11 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.95 | 1.00 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.08 | 1.58 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Rockwell Automation (ROK) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Flowserve (FLS) reports a yield of 1.11%, ranking against industry peers normally.
FLS
Capital Goods industry group
1.11%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- FLS
- 1.11%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
ROK
Capital Goods industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- ROK
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Flowserve (FLS) at 43.50% and Rockwell Automation (ROK) at 51.03% pay out an above-typical share of earnings for their industries, leaving thinner cover if profits dip.
FLS
Capital Goods industry group
43.50%
- Max
- 67.39%
- FLS
- 43.50%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
ROK
Capital Goods industry group
51.03%
- Max
- 67.39%
- ROK
- 51.03%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | FLS | ROK |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.11% | 0.00% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 43.50% | 51.03% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Rockwell Automation (ROK) at 29.97 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Flowserve (FLS) at 40.19 sits in the richer quartile — FLS needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.
FLS
Capital Goods industry group
40.19
- Max
- 59.38
- FLS
- 40.19
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
ROK
Capital Goods industry group
29.97
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- ROK
- 29.97
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Flowserve (FLS) at 2.17 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Rockwell Automation (ROK) at 4.65 sits in the pricier quartile — ROK costs more per dollar of sales.
FLS
Capital Goods industry group
2.17
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- FLS
- 2.17
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
ROK
Capital Goods industry group
4.65
- Max
- 7.54
- ROK
- 4.65
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Flowserve (FLS) at 4.40 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Rockwell Automation (ROK) at 11.76 prices above its benchmark range — ROK looks rich relative to book.
FLS
Capital Goods industry group
4.40
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- FLS
- 4.40
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
ROK
Capital Goods industry group
11.76
- ROK
- 11.76
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | FLS | ROK |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 40.19 | 29.97 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 2.17 | 4.65 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 4.40 | 11.76 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 3.62% | -1.13% |