FLS vs. QXO: Flowserve vs. QXO Stock Comparison
How do Flowserve (FLS) and QXO (QXO) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Flowserve (FLS) and QXO (QXO) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but FLS is classified in Machinery while QXO is classified in Trading Companies & Distributors.
| Profile Item | FLS | QXO |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Flowserve Corporation | QXO Inc. |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| GICS Industry | Machinery | Trading Companies & Distributors |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components | Trading Companies & Distributors |
| Market Capitalization | 10.19 billion USD | 11.99 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | March 17, 1980 | April 17, 2012 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | FLS | QXO |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 24.11% | -19.11% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 33.68% | -16.39% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 22.48% | -17.91% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
QXO (QXO) carries a highly aggressive beta of 2.28, indicating much higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, whereas Flowserve (FLS) is closer to market-like at 1.24 — a noticeable difference in market-sensitivity profile.
| Metric | FLS | QXO |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 42.18% | 68.10% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.24 | 2.28 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -38.76% | -95.70% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 1.61M | 19.01M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | FLS | QXO |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.47 | -0.34 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 0.70 | -0.55 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
QXO (QXO) reports a negative ROE of -4.60%; negative ROE can reflect losses or negative shareholders’ equity, so it is harder to read as capital efficiency. Meanwhile Flowserve (FLS) reports 11.61%, ranking against industry peers normally.
FLS
Capital Goods industry group
11.61%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- FLS
- 11.61%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
QXO
Capital Goods industry group
-4.60%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- QXO
- -4.60%
- Min
- -17.12%
Net Margin (TTM)
QXO (QXO) reports a negative net margin of -5.17%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Flowserve (FLS) reports 5.42%, ranking against industry peers normally.
FLS
Capital Goods industry group
5.42%
- Max
- 27.47%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- FLS
- 5.42%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
QXO
Capital Goods industry group
-5.17%
- Max
- 27.47%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- QXO
- -5.17%
- Min
- -12.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Flowserve (FLS) at 13.45% runs core operations around its industry’s norm, while QXO (QXO) at 1.29% operates in the bottom quartile.
FLS
Capital Goods industry group
13.45%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- FLS
- 13.45%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
QXO
Capital Goods industry group
1.29%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- QXO
- 1.29%
- Min
- -12.63%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | FLS | QXO |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 11.61% | -4.60% |
| ROA (TTM) | 6.36% | -0.27% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 5.42% | -5.17% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 13.45% | 1.29% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 35.30% | 24.54% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
QXO (QXO) at 11,924.96% clears its industry range for revenue growth, far stronger top-line momentum than Flowserve (FLS) at 3.76%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.
EPS Growth
Flowserve (FLS) at 23.36% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while QXO (QXO) at -672.73% falls below its industry range, a notably weak earnings reading.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | FLS | QXO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 3.76% | 11,924.96% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 9.37% | 433.80% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 23.36% | -672.73% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 22.39% | -- |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Flowserve (FLS) at 2.10 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while QXO (QXO) at 4.12 sits above its industry’s typical mid-range — comfortable liquidity, though possibly with more idle current assets relative to peers.
FLS
Capital Goods industry group
2.10
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- FLS
- 2.10
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- Min
- 0.36
QXO
Capital Goods industry group
4.12
- Max
- 5.22
- QXO
- 4.12
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- Min
- 0.36
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both Flowserve (FLS) at 0.95 and QXO (QXO) at 0.57 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
FLS
Capital Goods industry group
0.95
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- FLS
- 0.95
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
QXO
Capital Goods industry group
0.57
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- QXO
- 0.57
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | FLS | QXO |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 2.10 | 4.12 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.95 | 0.57 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.08 | 7.20 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
QXO (QXO) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Flowserve (FLS) reports a yield of 1.11%, ranking against industry peers normally.
FLS
Capital Goods industry group
1.11%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- FLS
- 1.11%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
QXO
Capital Goods industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- QXO
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
QXO (QXO) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Flowserve (FLS) reports a payout of 43.50%, ranking against industry peers normally.
FLS
Capital Goods industry group
43.50%
- Max
- 67.39%
- FLS
- 43.50%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
QXO
Capital Goods industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- QXO
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | FLS | QXO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.11% | 0.00% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 43.50% | 0.00% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
An earnings multiple is available for just one side: Flowserve (FLS) trades at 40.19 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while QXO (QXO) has no P/E ratio this period.
FLS
Capital Goods industry group
40.19
- Max
- 59.38
- FLS
- 40.19
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
QXO
Capital Goods industry group
--
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
- QXO
- --
P/S Ratio (TTM)
On P/S ratio, both Flowserve (FLS) at 2.17 and QXO (QXO) at 1.21 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.
FLS
Capital Goods industry group
2.17
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- FLS
- 2.17
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
QXO
Capital Goods industry group
1.21
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- QXO
- 1.21
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
QXO (QXO) at 0.90 sits in the lower P/B ratio quartile against book while Flowserve (FLS) at 4.40 is valued near its industry’s middle — QXO is cheaper on assets, though weigh it against ROE and asset quality.
FLS
Capital Goods industry group
4.40
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- FLS
- 4.40
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
QXO
Capital Goods industry group
0.90
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- QXO
- 0.90
- Min
- -1.08
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | FLS | QXO |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 40.19 | -- |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 2.17 | 1.21 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 4.40 | 0.90 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 3.62% | -21.23% |