Seek Returns logo

FLS vs. PNR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FLS and PNR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolFLSPNR
Company NameFlowserve CorporationPentair plc
CountryUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryMachineryMachinery
Market Capitalization7.06 billion USD17.87 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980May 3, 1973
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FLS and PNR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FLS vs. PNR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFLSPNR
5-Day Price Return3.07%6.81%
13-Week Price Return6.18%11.05%
26-Week Price Return-14.81%10.52%
52-Week Price Return19.27%31.56%
Month-to-Date Return-3.69%6.66%
Year-to-Date Return-6.17%8.32%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.83M1.69M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.51M1.61M
3-Month Volatility36.09%22.92%
Beta1.311.12

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FLS

13.94%

Machinery Industry

Max
34.68%
Q3
19.06%
Median
13.13%
Q1
8.53%
Min
-4.87%

FLS’s Return on Equity of 13.94% is on par with the norm for the Machinery industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

PNR

16.97%

Machinery Industry

Max
34.68%
Q3
19.06%
Median
13.13%
Q1
8.53%
Min
-4.87%

PNR’s Return on Equity of 16.97% is on par with the norm for the Machinery industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

FLS vs. PNR: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Machinery industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FLS

6.28%

Machinery Industry

Max
19.74%
Q3
11.24%
Median
8.13%
Q1
5.38%
Min
-1.11%

FLS’s Net Profit Margin of 6.28% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Machinery industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

PNR

14.86%

Machinery Industry

Max
19.74%
Q3
11.24%
Median
8.13%
Q1
5.38%
Min
-1.11%

A Net Profit Margin of 14.86% places PNR in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

FLS vs. PNR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Machinery industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FLS

10.90%

Machinery Industry

Max
26.63%
Q3
16.15%
Median
11.27%
Q1
7.72%
Min
-4.91%

FLS’s Operating Profit Margin of 10.90% is around the midpoint for the Machinery industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

PNR

18.77%

Machinery Industry

Max
26.63%
Q3
16.15%
Median
11.27%
Q1
7.72%
Min
-4.91%

An Operating Profit Margin of 18.77% places PNR in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

FLS vs. PNR: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Machinery industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFLSPNR
Return on Equity (TTM)13.94%16.97%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.32%9.32%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)6.28%14.86%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)10.90%18.77%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)33.12%41.20%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FLS

2.10

Machinery Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.32
Median
1.72
Q1
1.28
Min
0.78

FLS’s Current Ratio of 2.10 aligns with the median group of the Machinery industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

PNR

1.45

Machinery Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.32
Median
1.72
Q1
1.28
Min
0.78

PNR’s Current Ratio of 1.45 aligns with the median group of the Machinery industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

FLS vs. PNR: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Machinery industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FLS

0.67

Machinery Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.75
Median
0.44
Q1
0.26
Min
0.00

FLS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.67 is typical for the Machinery industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

PNR

0.38

Machinery Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.75
Median
0.44
Q1
0.26
Min
0.00

PNR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.38 is typical for the Machinery industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

FLS vs. PNR: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Machinery industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FLS

10.07

Machinery Industry

Max
67.55
Q3
33.79
Median
13.87
Q1
7.97
Min
-1.43

FLS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 10.07 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Machinery industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

PNR

9.11

Machinery Industry

Max
67.55
Q3
33.79
Median
13.87
Q1
7.97
Min
-1.43

PNR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.11 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Machinery industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

FLS vs. PNR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Machinery industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFLSPNR
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.101.45
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.410.76
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.670.38
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)10.079.11

Growth

Revenue Growth

FLS vs. PNR: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FLS vs. PNR: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FLS

1.58%

Machinery Industry

Max
5.32%
Q3
2.84%
Median
1.87%
Q1
1.09%
Min
0.00%

FLS’s Dividend Yield of 1.58% is consistent with its peers in the Machinery industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

PNR

0.90%

Machinery Industry

Max
5.32%
Q3
2.84%
Median
1.87%
Q1
1.09%
Min
0.00%

PNR’s Dividend Yield of 0.90% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

FLS vs. PNR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Machinery industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FLS

37.86%

Machinery Industry

Max
202.17%
Q3
98.65%
Median
55.54%
Q1
29.03%
Min
0.00%

FLS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 37.86% is within the typical range for the Machinery industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

PNR

26.01%

Machinery Industry

Max
202.17%
Q3
98.65%
Median
55.54%
Q1
29.03%
Min
0.00%

PNR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 26.01% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

FLS vs. PNR: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Machinery industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFLSPNR
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.58%0.90%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)37.86%26.01%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FLS

23.93

Machinery Industry

Max
53.66
Q3
31.29
Median
22.00
Q1
16.18
Min
7.00

FLS’s P/E Ratio of 23.93 is within the middle range for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

PNR

29.01

Machinery Industry

Max
53.66
Q3
31.29
Median
22.00
Q1
16.18
Min
7.00

PNR’s P/E Ratio of 29.01 is within the middle range for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FLS vs. PNR: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Machinery industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FLS

1.50

Machinery Industry

Max
5.04
Q3
2.72
Median
1.67
Q1
1.04
Min
0.24

FLS’s P/S Ratio of 1.50 aligns with the market consensus for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

PNR

4.31

Machinery Industry

Max
5.04
Q3
2.72
Median
1.67
Q1
1.04
Min
0.24

PNR’s P/S Ratio of 4.31 is in the upper echelon for the Machinery industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

FLS vs. PNR: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Machinery industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FLS

3.08

Machinery Industry

Max
7.23
Q3
3.90
Median
2.52
Q1
1.47
Min
0.49

FLS’s P/B Ratio of 3.08 is within the conventional range for the Machinery industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

PNR

4.60

Machinery Industry

Max
7.23
Q3
3.90
Median
2.52
Q1
1.47
Min
0.49

PNR’s P/B Ratio of 4.60 is in the upper tier for the Machinery industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

FLS vs. PNR: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Machinery industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFLSPNR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)23.9329.01
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.504.31
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.084.60
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)15.1519.80