FLS vs. MOG.B: Flowserve vs. Moog Stock Comparison
How do Flowserve (FLS) and Moog (MOG.B) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Flowserve (FLS) and Moog (MOG.B) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but FLS is classified in Machinery while MOG.B is classified in Aerospace & Defense.
| Profile Item | FLS | MOG.B |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Flowserve Corporation | Moog Inc. Class B Common Stock |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| GICS Industry | Machinery | Aerospace & Defense |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Capitalization | 10.19 billion USD | 10.30 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | March 17, 1980 | March 17, 1980 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | FLS | MOG.B |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 24.11% | 51.82% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 33.68% | 37.88% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 22.48% | 32.49% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
Flowserve (FLS) trades around 1.61M shares per day on average, while Moog (MOG.B) sees only 214 — a volume gap that can matter for position sizing, exit liquidity, and order execution.
| Metric | FLS | MOG.B |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 42.18% | 43.76% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.24 | 0.82 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -38.76% | -30.76% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 1.61M | 214 |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | FLS | MOG.B |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.47 | 1.09 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 0.70 | 1.71 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both Flowserve (FLS) at 11.61% and Moog (MOG.B) at 18.11% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
FLS
Capital Goods industry group
11.61%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- FLS
- 11.61%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
MOG.B
Capital Goods industry group
18.11%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- MOG.B
- 18.11%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both Flowserve (FLS) at 5.42% and Moog (MOG.B) at 8.73% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
FLS
Capital Goods industry group
5.42%
- Max
- 27.47%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- FLS
- 5.42%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
MOG.B
Capital Goods industry group
8.73%
- Max
- 27.47%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- MOG.B
- 8.73%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Flowserve (FLS) at 13.45% and Moog (MOG.B) at 14.52% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
FLS
Capital Goods industry group
13.45%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- FLS
- 13.45%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
MOG.B
Capital Goods industry group
14.52%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- MOG.B
- 14.52%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | FLS | MOG.B |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 11.61% | 18.11% |
| ROA (TTM) | 6.36% | 7.04% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 5.42% | 8.73% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 13.45% | 14.52% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 35.30% | 28.20% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Flowserve (FLS) at 3.76% and Moog (MOG.B) at 6.97% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Both Flowserve (FLS) at 23.36% and Moog (MOG.B) at 14.53% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | FLS | MOG.B |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 3.76% | 6.97% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 9.37% | 8.34% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 23.36% | 14.53% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 22.39% | 14.92% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Flowserve (FLS) at 2.10 and Moog (MOG.B) at 2.09 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.
FLS
Capital Goods industry group
2.10
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- FLS
- 2.10
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- Min
- 0.36
MOG.B
Capital Goods industry group
2.09
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- MOG.B
- 2.09
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- Min
- 0.36
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both Flowserve (FLS) at 0.95 and Moog (MOG.B) at 0.52 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
FLS
Capital Goods industry group
0.95
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- FLS
- 0.95
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
MOG.B
Capital Goods industry group
0.52
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- MOG.B
- 0.52
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | FLS | MOG.B |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 2.10 | 2.09 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.95 | 0.52 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.08 | 1.71 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Flowserve (FLS) at 1.11% and Moog (MOG.B) at 0.37% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
FLS
Capital Goods industry group
1.11%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- FLS
- 1.11%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
MOG.B
Capital Goods industry group
0.37%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- MOG.B
- 0.37%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Moog (MOG.B) at 10.03% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Flowserve (FLS) at 43.50% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
FLS
Capital Goods industry group
43.50%
- Max
- 67.39%
- FLS
- 43.50%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
MOG.B
Capital Goods industry group
10.03%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- MOG.B
- 10.03%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | FLS | MOG.B |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.11% | 0.37% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 43.50% | 10.03% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Moog (MOG.B) at 27.46 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Flowserve (FLS) at 40.19 sits in the richer quartile — FLS needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.
FLS
Capital Goods industry group
40.19
- Max
- 59.38
- FLS
- 40.19
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
MOG.B
Capital Goods industry group
27.46
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- MOG.B
- 27.46
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)
On P/S ratio, both Flowserve (FLS) at 2.17 and Moog (MOG.B) at 2.38 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.
FLS
Capital Goods industry group
2.17
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- FLS
- 2.17
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
MOG.B
Capital Goods industry group
2.38
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- MOG.B
- 2.38
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both Flowserve (FLS) at 4.40 and Moog (MOG.B) at 4.63 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
FLS
Capital Goods industry group
4.40
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- FLS
- 4.40
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
MOG.B
Capital Goods industry group
4.63
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- MOG.B
- 4.63
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | FLS | MOG.B |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 40.19 | 27.46 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 2.17 | 2.38 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 4.40 | 4.63 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 3.62% | 3.24% |