Seek Returns

FLS vs. LII: Flowserve vs. Lennox Stock Comparison

How do Flowserve (FLS) and Lennox (LII) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Flowserve (FLS) and Lennox (LII) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but FLS is classified in Machinery while LII is classified in Building Products.

Company profile comparison for Flowserve (FLS) and Lennox (LII)
Profile ItemFLSLII
NameFlowserve CorporationLennox International Inc.
Country/RegionUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS Industry GroupCapital GoodsCapital Goods
GICS IndustryMachineryBuilding Products
GICS Sub-IndustryIndustrial Machinery & Supplies & ComponentsBuilding Products
Market Capitalization10.19 billion USD11.70 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980July 29, 1999
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

FLS
LII
GSPC
Loading price history…
Flowserve (FLS) vs. Lennox (LII), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for Flowserve (FLS) and Lennox (LII). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for Flowserve (FLS) and Lennox (LII). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Flowserve (FLS) and Lennox (LII)
MetricFLSLII
Total Return (1Y)24.11%-27.83%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)33.68%-2.32%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)22.48%3.79%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

FLS
LII
GSPC
Loading price history…
Flowserve (FLS) vs. Lennox (LII), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for Flowserve (FLS) and Lennox (LII). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Flowserve (FLS) and Lennox (LII)
MetricFLSLII
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)42.18%41.59%
Beta (5Y)1.241.18
Max Drawdown (5Y)-38.76%-49.95%
Avg. Volume (3M)1.61M563.34K

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
FLS and LII are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Flowserve (FLS) and Lennox (LII)
MetricFLSLII
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)0.47-0.77
Sortino Ratio (1Y)0.70-0.96

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Lennox (LII) at 62.82% clears its industry range for ROE, a sharper capital-efficiency signal than Flowserve (FLS) at 11.61%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.

FLS

Capital Goods industry group

11.61%

Max
40.55%
Q3
19.29%
Median
12.12%
FLS
11.61%
Q1
4.08%
Min
-17.12%

LII

Capital Goods industry group

62.82%

LII
62.82%
Max
40.55%
Q3
19.29%
Median
12.12%
Q1
4.08%
Min
-17.12%
Loading chart…
Flowserve (FLS) vs. Lennox (LII): A comparison of their ROE against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Lennox (LII) at 13.76% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Flowserve (FLS) at 5.42%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

FLS

Capital Goods industry group

5.42%

Max
27.47%
Q3
12.10%
Median
6.30%
FLS
5.42%
Q1
1.40%
Min
-12.89%

LII

Capital Goods industry group

13.76%

Max
27.47%
LII
13.76%
Q3
12.10%
Median
6.30%
Q1
1.40%
Min
-12.89%
Loading chart…
Flowserve (FLS) vs. Lennox (LII): A comparison of their net margin against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Lennox (LII) at 20.57% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Flowserve (FLS) at 13.45%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

FLS

Capital Goods industry group

13.45%

Max
36.60%
Q3
18.33%
FLS
13.45%
Median
11.12%
Q1
5.14%
Min
-12.63%

LII

Capital Goods industry group

20.57%

Max
36.60%
LII
20.57%
Q3
18.33%
Median
11.12%
Q1
5.14%
Min
-12.63%
Loading chart…
Flowserve (FLS) vs. Lennox (LII): A comparison of their operating margin against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Flowserve (FLS) and Lennox (LII)
MetricFLSLII
ROE (TTM)11.61%62.82%
ROA (TTM)6.36%15.93%
Net Margin (TTM)5.42%13.76%
Operating Margin (TTM)13.45%20.57%
Gross Margin (TTM)35.30%32.62%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Flowserve (FLS) at 3.76% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Lennox (LII) at -2.73% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Loading chart…
Flowserve (FLS) vs. Lennox (LII): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Both Flowserve (FLS) at 23.36% and Lennox (LII) at 1.11% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Loading chart…
Flowserve (FLS) vs. Lennox (LII): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Flowserve (FLS) and Lennox (LII)
MetricFLSLII
Revenue Growth (YoY)3.76%-2.73%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)9.37%3.26%
EPS Growth (YoY)23.36%1.11%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)22.39%17.97%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Flowserve (FLS) at 2.10 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Lennox (LII) at 1.21 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for LII.

FLS

Capital Goods industry group

2.10

Max
5.22
Q3
2.95
FLS
2.10
Median
2.08
Q1
1.43
Min
0.36

LII

Capital Goods industry group

1.21

Max
5.22
Q3
2.95
Median
2.08
Q1
1.43
LII
1.21
Min
0.36
Loading chart…
Flowserve (FLS) vs. Lennox (LII): A comparison of their current ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Flowserve (FLS) at 0.95 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while Lennox (LII) at 1.58 uses more debt funding than most peers.

FLS

Capital Goods industry group

0.95

Max
2.33
Q3
1.12
FLS
0.95
Median
0.60
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00

LII

Capital Goods industry group

1.58

Max
2.33
LII
1.58
Q3
1.12
Median
0.60
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Flowserve (FLS) vs. Lennox (LII): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Flowserve (FLS) and Lennox (LII)
MetricFLSLII
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.101.21
Debt / Equity (MRQ)0.951.58
Net Debt / EBITDA2.081.73

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Lennox (LII) at 1.53% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Flowserve (FLS) at 1.11% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, LII the richer one.

FLS

Capital Goods industry group

1.11%

Max
2.66%
Q3
1.14%
FLS
1.11%
Median
0.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LII

Capital Goods industry group

1.53%

Max
2.66%
LII
1.53%
Q3
1.14%
Median
0.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Flowserve (FLS) vs. Lennox (LII): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Lennox (LII) at 24.68% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Flowserve (FLS) at 43.50% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.

FLS

Capital Goods industry group

43.50%

Max
67.39%
FLS
43.50%
Q3
28.02%
Median
6.86%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LII

Capital Goods industry group

24.68%

Max
67.39%
Q3
28.02%
LII
24.68%
Median
6.86%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Flowserve (FLS) vs. Lennox (LII): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Flowserve (FLS) and Lennox (LII)
MetricFLSLII
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.11%1.53%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)43.50%24.68%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Lennox (LII) at 15.47 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Flowserve (FLS) at 40.19 sits in the richer quartile — a clear split in what investors pay for each dollar of trailing earnings.

FLS

Capital Goods industry group

40.19

Max
59.38
FLS
40.19
Q3
35.92
Median
25.41
Q1
19.47
Min
3.03

LII

Capital Goods industry group

15.47

Max
59.38
Q3
35.92
Median
25.41
Q1
19.47
LII
15.47
Min
3.03
Loading chart…
Flowserve (FLS) vs. Lennox (LII): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

On P/S ratio, both Flowserve (FLS) at 2.17 and Lennox (LII) at 2.15 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.

FLS

Capital Goods industry group

2.17

Max
7.54
Q3
3.76
FLS
2.17
Median
2.15
Q1
1.03
Min
0.03

LII

Capital Goods industry group

2.15

Max
7.54
Q3
3.76
Median
2.15
LII
2.15
Q1
1.03
Min
0.03
Loading chart…
Flowserve (FLS) vs. Lennox (LII): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Flowserve (FLS) at 4.40 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Lennox (LII) at 8.88 carries an above-peer premium to book — LII is pricier on assets.

FLS

Capital Goods industry group

4.40

Max
9.66
Q3
5.00
FLS
4.40
Median
3.12
Q1
1.81
Min
-1.08

LII

Capital Goods industry group

8.88

Max
9.66
LII
8.88
Q3
5.00
Median
3.12
Q1
1.81
Min
-1.08
Loading chart…
Flowserve (FLS) vs. Lennox (LII): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Flowserve (FLS) and Lennox (LII)
MetricFLSLII
P/E Ratio (TTM)40.1915.47
P/S Ratio (TTM)2.172.15
P/B Ratio (MRQ)4.408.88
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)3.62%3.14%