Seek Returns

FLS vs. LHX: Flowserve vs. L3Harris Stock Comparison

How do Flowserve (FLS) and L3Harris (LHX) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Flowserve (FLS) and L3Harris (LHX) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but FLS is classified in Machinery while LHX is classified in Aerospace & Defense.

Company profile comparison for Flowserve (FLS) and L3Harris (LHX)
Profile ItemFLSLHX
NameFlowserve CorporationL3Harris Technologies, Inc.
Country/RegionUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS Industry GroupCapital GoodsCapital Goods
GICS IndustryMachineryAerospace & Defense
GICS Sub-IndustryIndustrial Machinery & Supplies & ComponentsAerospace & Defense
Market Capitalization10.19 billion USD48.39 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980December 31, 1981
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

FLS
LHX
GSPC
Loading price history…
Flowserve (FLS) vs. L3Harris (LHX), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for Flowserve (FLS) and L3Harris (LHX). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for Flowserve (FLS) and L3Harris (LHX). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Flowserve (FLS) and L3Harris (LHX)
MetricFLSLHX
Total Return (1Y)24.11%-5.21%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)33.68%16.68%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)22.48%5.91%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

FLS
LHX
GSPC
Loading price history…
Flowserve (FLS) vs. L3Harris (LHX), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for Flowserve (FLS) and L3Harris (LHX). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Flowserve (FLS) and L3Harris (LHX)
MetricFLSLHX
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)42.18%29.75%
Beta (5Y)1.240.46
Max Drawdown (5Y)-38.76%-38.16%
Avg. Volume (3M)1.61M1.70M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
FLS and LHX are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Flowserve (FLS) and L3Harris (LHX)
MetricFLSLHX
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)0.47-0.32
Sortino Ratio (1Y)0.70-0.45

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Both Flowserve (FLS) at 11.61% and L3Harris (LHX) at 10.03% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

FLS

Capital Goods industry group

11.61%

Max
40.55%
Q3
19.29%
Median
12.12%
FLS
11.61%
Q1
4.08%
Min
-17.12%

LHX

Capital Goods industry group

10.03%

Max
40.55%
Q3
19.29%
Median
12.12%
LHX
10.03%
Q1
4.08%
Min
-17.12%
Loading chart…
Flowserve (FLS) vs. L3Harris (LHX): A comparison of their ROE against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Both Flowserve (FLS) at 5.42% and L3Harris (LHX) at 8.76% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

FLS

Capital Goods industry group

5.42%

Max
27.47%
Q3
12.10%
Median
6.30%
FLS
5.42%
Q1
1.40%
Min
-12.89%

LHX

Capital Goods industry group

8.76%

Max
27.47%
Q3
12.10%
LHX
8.76%
Median
6.30%
Q1
1.40%
Min
-12.89%
Loading chart…
Flowserve (FLS) vs. L3Harris (LHX): A comparison of their net margin against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both Flowserve (FLS) at 13.45% and L3Harris (LHX) at 14.34% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

FLS

Capital Goods industry group

13.45%

Max
36.60%
Q3
18.33%
FLS
13.45%
Median
11.12%
Q1
5.14%
Min
-12.63%

LHX

Capital Goods industry group

14.34%

Max
36.60%
Q3
18.33%
LHX
14.34%
Median
11.12%
Q1
5.14%
Min
-12.63%
Loading chart…
Flowserve (FLS) vs. L3Harris (LHX): A comparison of their operating margin against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Flowserve (FLS) and L3Harris (LHX)
MetricFLSLHX
ROE (TTM)11.61%10.03%
ROA (TTM)6.36%4.56%
Net Margin (TTM)5.42%8.76%
Operating Margin (TTM)13.45%14.34%
Gross Margin (TTM)35.30%25.55%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Both Flowserve (FLS) at 3.76% and L3Harris (LHX) at 2.53% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Loading chart…
Flowserve (FLS) vs. L3Harris (LHX): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Both Flowserve (FLS) at 23.36% and L3Harris (LHX) at 8.39% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Loading chart…
Flowserve (FLS) vs. L3Harris (LHX): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Flowserve (FLS) and L3Harris (LHX)
MetricFLSLHX
Revenue Growth (YoY)3.76%2.53%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)9.37%8.62%
EPS Growth (YoY)23.36%8.39%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)22.39%15.82%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Flowserve (FLS) at 2.10 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while L3Harris (LHX) at 1.20 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for LHX.

FLS

Capital Goods industry group

2.10

Max
5.22
Q3
2.95
FLS
2.10
Median
2.08
Q1
1.43
Min
0.36

LHX

Capital Goods industry group

1.20

Max
5.22
Q3
2.95
Median
2.08
Q1
1.43
LHX
1.20
Min
0.36
Loading chart…
Flowserve (FLS) vs. L3Harris (LHX): A comparison of their current ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Both Flowserve (FLS) at 0.95 and L3Harris (LHX) at 0.52 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.

FLS

Capital Goods industry group

0.95

Max
2.33
Q3
1.12
FLS
0.95
Median
0.60
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00

LHX

Capital Goods industry group

0.52

Max
2.33
Q3
1.12
Median
0.60
LHX
0.52
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Flowserve (FLS) vs. L3Harris (LHX): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Flowserve (FLS) and L3Harris (LHX)
MetricFLSLHX
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.101.20
Debt / Equity (MRQ)0.950.52
Net Debt / EBITDA2.081.88

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

L3Harris (LHX) at 1.92% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Flowserve (FLS) at 1.11% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, LHX the richer one.

FLS

Capital Goods industry group

1.11%

Max
2.66%
Q3
1.14%
FLS
1.11%
Median
0.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LHX

Capital Goods industry group

1.92%

Max
2.66%
LHX
1.92%
Q3
1.14%
Median
0.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Flowserve (FLS) vs. L3Harris (LHX): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Both Flowserve (FLS) at 43.50% and L3Harris (LHX) at 46.09% pay out an above-typical share of earnings for their industries, leaving thinner cover if profits dip.

FLS

Capital Goods industry group

43.50%

Max
67.39%
FLS
43.50%
Q3
28.02%
Median
6.86%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LHX

Capital Goods industry group

46.09%

Max
67.39%
LHX
46.09%
Q3
28.02%
Median
6.86%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Flowserve (FLS) vs. L3Harris (LHX): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Flowserve (FLS) and L3Harris (LHX)
MetricFLSLHX
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.11%1.92%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)43.50%46.09%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

L3Harris (LHX) at 24.20 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Flowserve (FLS) at 40.19 sits in the richer quartile — FLS needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.

FLS

Capital Goods industry group

40.19

Max
59.38
FLS
40.19
Q3
35.92
Median
25.41
Q1
19.47
Min
3.03

LHX

Capital Goods industry group

24.20

Max
59.38
Q3
35.92
Median
25.41
LHX
24.20
Q1
19.47
Min
3.03
Loading chart…
Flowserve (FLS) vs. L3Harris (LHX): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

On P/S ratio, both Flowserve (FLS) at 2.17 and L3Harris (LHX) at 2.07 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.

FLS

Capital Goods industry group

2.17

Max
7.54
Q3
3.76
FLS
2.17
Median
2.15
Q1
1.03
Min
0.03

LHX

Capital Goods industry group

2.07

Max
7.54
Q3
3.76
Median
2.15
LHX
2.07
Q1
1.03
Min
0.03
Loading chart…
Flowserve (FLS) vs. L3Harris (LHX): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

On P/B ratio, both Flowserve (FLS) at 4.40 and L3Harris (LHX) at 2.39 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.

FLS

Capital Goods industry group

4.40

Max
9.66
Q3
5.00
FLS
4.40
Median
3.12
Q1
1.81
Min
-1.08

LHX

Capital Goods industry group

2.39

Max
9.66
Q3
5.00
Median
3.12
LHX
2.39
Q1
1.81
Min
-1.08
Loading chart…
Flowserve (FLS) vs. L3Harris (LHX): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Flowserve (FLS) and L3Harris (LHX)
MetricFLSLHX
P/E Ratio (TTM)40.1924.20
P/S Ratio (TTM)2.172.07
P/B Ratio (MRQ)4.402.39
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)3.62%7.09%