FLS vs. HONA: Flowserve vs. Honeywell Aerospace Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Flowserve (FLS) and Honeywell Aerospace (HONA) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but FLS is classified in Machinery while HONA is classified in Aerospace & Defense.

Flowserve (FLS) has been public since March 17, 1980, giving it decades of market history across multiple cycles, while Honeywell Aerospace (HONA) listed only on June 15, 2026 and lacks comparable through-cycle data.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Honeywell Aerospace (HONA) reports a negative beta of -5.78, suggesting inverse market sensitivity over the measurement window. That is uncommon for ordinary equities and can reflect commodity-linked or hedge-like exposure, but it can also come from statistical noise. Flowserve (FLS) has a non-negative beta of 1.24.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Both FLS and HONA need 1-year volatility and 1-year return to plot risk-return positioning.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Capital efficiency shows on one side only: Flowserve (FLS) earns 11.61% on shareholders’ equity, ranked against its industry; Honeywell Aerospace (HONA) has no ROE this period.

Both Flowserve (FLS) at 5.42% and Honeywell Aerospace (HONA) at 11.25% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

Honeywell Aerospace (HONA) at 23.69% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Flowserve (FLS) at 13.45%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Both Flowserve (FLS) at 3.76% and Honeywell Aerospace (HONA) at 12.68% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Flowserve (FLS) at 23.36% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Honeywell Aerospace (HONA) at -36.80% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Both Flowserve (FLS) at 2.10 and Honeywell Aerospace (HONA) at 1.64 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.

Only one side’s leverage can be read here: Flowserve (FLS) carries debt-to-equity ratio of 0.95 against its industry range, while Honeywell Aerospace (HONA) reports no figure this period.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Honeywell Aerospace (HONA) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Flowserve (FLS) reports a yield of 1.11%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Honeywell Aerospace (HONA) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Flowserve (FLS) reports a payout of 43.50%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Both Flowserve (FLS) at 40.19 and Honeywell Aerospace (HONA) at 43.32 sit in the richer earnings-multiple quartile for P/E ratio, so investors are paying more for TTM earnings than they pay for typical peers.

On P/S ratio, both Flowserve (FLS) at 2.17 and Honeywell Aerospace (HONA) at 2.69 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.

Honeywell Aerospace (HONA) reports a negative P/B ratio of -18.85, meaning negative book equity — the multiple itself is not meaningful for valuation. Meanwhile Flowserve (FLS) reports 4.40, ranking against industry peers normally.

Valuation Metrics