Seek Returns

FLS vs. FTV: Flowserve vs. Fortive Stock Comparison

How do Flowserve (FLS) and Fortive (FTV) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Flowserve (FLS) and Fortive (FTV) are both classified in the Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components sub-industry within the broader Machinery industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

Company profile comparison for Flowserve (FLS) and Fortive (FTV)
Profile ItemFLSFTV
NameFlowserve CorporationFortive Corporation
Country/RegionUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS Industry GroupCapital GoodsCapital Goods
GICS IndustryMachineryMachinery
GICS Sub-IndustryIndustrial Machinery & Supplies & ComponentsIndustrial Machinery & Supplies & Components
Market Capitalization10.19 billion USD19.46 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980July 5, 2016
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

FLS
FTV
GSPC
Loading price history…
Flowserve (FLS) vs. Fortive (FTV), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for Flowserve (FLS) and Fortive (FTV). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for Flowserve (FLS) and Fortive (FTV). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Flowserve (FLS) and Fortive (FTV)
MetricFLSFTV
Total Return (1Y)24.11%31.85%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)33.68%11.44%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)22.48%3.01%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

FLS
FTV
GSPC
Loading price history…
Flowserve (FLS) vs. Fortive (FTV), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for Flowserve (FLS) and Fortive (FTV). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Flowserve (FLS) and Fortive (FTV)
MetricFLSFTV
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)42.18%27.76%
Beta (5Y)1.241.01
Max Drawdown (5Y)-38.76%-32.10%
Avg. Volume (3M)1.61M2.44M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
FLS and FTV are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Flowserve (FLS) and Fortive (FTV)
MetricFLSFTV
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)0.470.99
Sortino Ratio (1Y)0.701.51

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Both Flowserve (FLS) at 11.61% and Fortive (FTV) at 10.55% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

FLS

Capital Goods industry group

11.61%

Max
40.55%
Q3
19.29%
Median
12.12%
FLS
11.61%
Q1
4.08%
Min
-17.12%

FTV

Capital Goods industry group

10.55%

Max
40.55%
Q3
19.29%
Median
12.12%
FTV
10.55%
Q1
4.08%
Min
-17.12%
Loading chart…
Flowserve (FLS) vs. Fortive (FTV): A comparison of their ROE against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Fortive (FTV) at 14.83% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Flowserve (FLS) at 5.42%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

FLS

Capital Goods industry group

5.42%

Max
27.47%
Q3
12.10%
Median
6.30%
FLS
5.42%
Q1
1.40%
Min
-12.89%

FTV

Capital Goods industry group

14.83%

Max
27.47%
FTV
14.83%
Q3
12.10%
Median
6.30%
Q1
1.40%
Min
-12.89%
Loading chart…
Flowserve (FLS) vs. Fortive (FTV): A comparison of their net margin against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Fortive (FTV) at 21.30% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Flowserve (FLS) at 13.45%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

FLS

Capital Goods industry group

13.45%

Max
36.60%
Q3
18.33%
FLS
13.45%
Median
11.12%
Q1
5.14%
Min
-12.63%

FTV

Capital Goods industry group

21.30%

Max
36.60%
FTV
21.30%
Q3
18.33%
Median
11.12%
Q1
5.14%
Min
-12.63%
Loading chart…
Flowserve (FLS) vs. Fortive (FTV): A comparison of their operating margin against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Flowserve (FLS) and Fortive (FTV)
MetricFLSFTV
ROE (TTM)11.61%10.55%
ROA (TTM)6.36%4.61%
Net Margin (TTM)5.42%14.83%
Operating Margin (TTM)13.45%21.30%
Gross Margin (TTM)35.30%63.47%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Both Flowserve (FLS) at 3.76% and Fortive (FTV) at 1.92% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Loading chart…
Flowserve (FLS) vs. Fortive (FTV): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Both Flowserve (FLS) at 23.36% and Fortive (FTV) at -26.69% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Loading chart…
Flowserve (FLS) vs. Fortive (FTV): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Flowserve (FLS) and Fortive (FTV)
MetricFLSFTV
Revenue Growth (YoY)3.76%1.92%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)9.37%-10.62%
EPS Growth (YoY)23.36%-26.69%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)22.39%-6.26%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Flowserve (FLS) at 2.10 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Fortive (FTV) at 1.23 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for FTV.

FLS

Capital Goods industry group

2.10

Max
5.22
Q3
2.95
FLS
2.10
Median
2.08
Q1
1.43
Min
0.36

FTV

Capital Goods industry group

1.23

Max
5.22
Q3
2.95
Median
2.08
Q1
1.43
FTV
1.23
Min
0.36
Loading chart…
Flowserve (FLS) vs. Fortive (FTV): A comparison of their current ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Both Flowserve (FLS) at 0.95 and Fortive (FTV) at 0.60 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.

FLS

Capital Goods industry group

0.95

Max
2.33
Q3
1.12
FLS
0.95
Median
0.60
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00

FTV

Capital Goods industry group

0.60

Max
2.33
Q3
1.12
FTV
0.60
Median
0.60
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Flowserve (FLS) vs. Fortive (FTV): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Flowserve (FLS) and Fortive (FTV)
MetricFLSFTV
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.101.23
Debt / Equity (MRQ)0.950.60
Net Debt / EBITDA2.082.45

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both Flowserve (FLS) at 1.11% and Fortive (FTV) at 0.38% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

FLS

Capital Goods industry group

1.11%

Max
2.66%
Q3
1.14%
FLS
1.11%
Median
0.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FTV

Capital Goods industry group

0.38%

Max
2.66%
Q3
1.14%
FTV
0.38%
Median
0.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Flowserve (FLS) vs. Fortive (FTV): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Fortive (FTV) at 11.85% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Flowserve (FLS) at 43.50% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.

FLS

Capital Goods industry group

43.50%

Max
67.39%
FLS
43.50%
Q3
28.02%
Median
6.86%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FTV

Capital Goods industry group

11.85%

Max
67.39%
Q3
28.02%
FTV
11.85%
Median
6.86%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Flowserve (FLS) vs. Fortive (FTV): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Flowserve (FLS) and Fortive (FTV)
MetricFLSFTV
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.11%0.38%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)43.50%11.85%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Fortive (FTV) at 30.98 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Flowserve (FLS) at 40.19 sits in the richer quartile — FLS needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.

FLS

Capital Goods industry group

40.19

Max
59.38
FLS
40.19
Q3
35.92
Median
25.41
Q1
19.47
Min
3.03

FTV

Capital Goods industry group

30.98

Max
59.38
Q3
35.92
FTV
30.98
Median
25.41
Q1
19.47
Min
3.03
Loading chart…
Flowserve (FLS) vs. Fortive (FTV): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Flowserve (FLS) at 2.17 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Fortive (FTV) at 4.43 sits in the pricier quartile — FTV costs more per dollar of sales.

FLS

Capital Goods industry group

2.17

Max
7.54
Q3
3.76
FLS
2.17
Median
2.15
Q1
1.03
Min
0.03

FTV

Capital Goods industry group

4.43

Max
7.54
FTV
4.43
Q3
3.76
Median
2.15
Q1
1.03
Min
0.03
Loading chart…
Flowserve (FLS) vs. Fortive (FTV): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

On P/B ratio, both Flowserve (FLS) at 4.40 and Fortive (FTV) at 3.28 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.

FLS

Capital Goods industry group

4.40

Max
9.66
Q3
5.00
FLS
4.40
Median
3.12
Q1
1.81
Min
-1.08

FTV

Capital Goods industry group

3.28

Max
9.66
Q3
5.00
FTV
3.28
Median
3.12
Q1
1.81
Min
-1.08
Loading chart…
Flowserve (FLS) vs. Fortive (FTV): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Flowserve (FLS) and Fortive (FTV)
MetricFLSFTV
P/E Ratio (TTM)40.1930.98
P/S Ratio (TTM)2.174.43
P/B Ratio (MRQ)4.403.28
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)3.62%5.05%