FLR vs. LUV: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on October 5, 2025

Here’s a clear look at FLR and LUV, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	FLR	LUV
Company Name	Fluor Corporation	Southwest Airlines Co.
Country	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Industrials	Industrials
GICS Industry	Construction & Engineering	Passenger Airlines
Market Capitalization	6.93 billion USD	17.08 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	December 1, 2000	January 2, 1980
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FLR and LUV by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FLR vs. LUV: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	FLR	LUV
5-Day Price Return	-3.84%	-3.48%
13-Week Price Return	-17.94%	-1.63%
26-Week Price Return	11.47%	-7.21%
52-Week Price Return	-12.15%	8.06%
Month-to-Date Return	2.56%	-3.01%
Year-to-Date Return	-14.70%	-5.09%
10-Day Avg. Volume	4.01M	11.04M
3-Month Avg. Volume	4.26M	10.65M
3-Month Volatility	63.23%	40.41%
Beta	1.60	1.25

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FLR

105.11%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 26.79%
Q3: 16.47%
Median: 10.66%
Q1: 8.46%
Min: -1.86%

FLR’s Return on Equity of 105.11% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

LUV

4.11%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 49.96%
Q3: 27.29%
Median: 16.68%
Q1: 8.40%
Min: -15.23%

LUV’s Return on Equity of 4.11% is in the lower quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

FLR vs. LUV: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FLR

25.35%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 11.67%
Q3: 6.13%
Median: 3.82%
Q1: 2.31%
Min: -2.77%

FLR’s Net Profit Margin of 25.35% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

LUV

1.43%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 16.00%
Q3: 8.99%
Median: 6.35%
Q1: 3.18%
Min: -4.22%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry, LUV’s Net Profit Margin of 1.43% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

FLR vs. LUV: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FLR

1.84%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 17.78%
Q3: 9.61%
Median: 6.19%
Q1: 3.73%
Min: -1.78%

FLR’s Operating Profit Margin of 1.84% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

LUV

1.15%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 22.47%
Q3: 12.67%
Median: 8.62%
Q1: 4.63%
Min: -2.30%

LUV’s Operating Profit Margin of 1.15% is in the lower quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

FLR vs. LUV: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	FLR	LUV
Return on Equity (TTM)	105.11%	4.11%
Return on Assets (TTM)	45.38%	1.20%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	25.35%	1.43%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	1.84%	1.15%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	3.02%	73.31%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FLR

1.62

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 2.17
Q3: 1.50
Median: 1.23
Q1: 1.00
Min: 0.65

FLR’s Current Ratio of 1.62 is in the upper quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

LUV

0.56

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 1.44
Q3: 0.91
Median: 0.73
Q1: 0.54
Min: 0.18

LUV’s Current Ratio of 0.56 aligns with the median group of the Passenger Airlines industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

FLR vs. LUV: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FLR

0.18

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 2.37
Q3: 1.24
Median: 0.62
Q1: 0.31
Min: 0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, FLR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.18 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

LUV

0.51

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 10.23
Q3: 5.04
Median: 1.27
Q1: 0.82
Min: 0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry, LUV’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.51 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

FLR vs. LUV: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FLR

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 36.37
Q3: 17.88
Median: 8.20
Q1: 4.98
Min: -6.49

Interest Coverage Ratio data for FLR is currently unavailable.

LUV

9.27

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 22.60
Q3: 17.27
Median: 6.75
Q1: 1.94
Min: -8.55

LUV’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.27 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Passenger Airlines industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

FLR vs. LUV: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	FLR	LUV
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.62	0.56
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	1.62	0.45
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.18	0.51
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	--	9.27

Growth

Revenue Growth

FLR vs. LUV: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FLR vs. LUV: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FLR

0.00%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 5.80%
Q3: 3.33%
Median: 2.22%
Q1: 0.21%
Min: 0.00%

FLR currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

LUV

2.51%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 7.04%
Q3: 3.76%
Median: 1.72%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

LUV’s Dividend Yield of 2.51% is consistent with its peers in the Passenger Airlines industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

FLR vs. LUV: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FLR

0.00%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 139.17%
Q3: 74.39%
Median: 51.48%
Q1: 15.67%
Min: 0.00%

FLR has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

LUV

59.15%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 99.73%
Q3: 50.30%
Median: 23.18%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

LUV’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 59.15% is in the upper quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

FLR vs. LUV: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	FLR	LUV
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.00%	2.51%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	0.00%	59.15%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FLR

1.65

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 41.00
Q3: 26.91
Median: 16.02
Q1: 13.49
Min: 1.65

In the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, FLR’s P/E Ratio of 1.65 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

LUV

43.34

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 18.74
Q3: 11.24
Median: 8.33
Q1: 6.11
Min: 2.97

At 43.34, LUV’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Passenger Airlines industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

FLR vs. LUV: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FLR

0.42

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 2.93
Q3: 1.65
Median: 0.71
Q1: 0.45
Min: 0.11

In the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, FLR’s P/S Ratio of 0.42 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

LUV

0.62

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 1.07
Q3: 0.73
Median: 0.62
Q1: 0.40
Min: 0.09

LUV’s P/S Ratio of 0.62 aligns with the market consensus for the Passenger Airlines industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

FLR vs. LUV: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FLR

1.42

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 7.96
Q3: 4.06
Median: 1.98
Q1: 1.23
Min: 0.24

FLR’s P/B Ratio of 1.42 is within the conventional range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

LUV

2.31

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 3.47
Q3: 3.19
Median: 1.94
Q1: 1.28
Min: 0.50

LUV’s P/B Ratio of 2.31 is within the conventional range for the Passenger Airlines industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

FLR vs. LUV: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	FLR	LUV
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	1.65	43.34
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	0.42	0.62
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	1.42	2.31
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	7.22	45.31