Seek Returns logo

FIS vs. UMC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FIS and UMC, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

FIS is a standard domestic listing, while UMC trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolFISUMC
Company NameFidelity National Information Services, Inc.United Microelectronics Corporation
CountryUnited StatesTaiwan
GICS SectorFinancialsInformation Technology
GICS IndustryFinancial ServicesSemiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment
Market Capitalization34.85 billion USD18.21 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 20, 2001September 19, 2000
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FIS and UMC by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FIS vs. UMC: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFISUMC
5-Day Price Return1.41%-2.23%
13-Week Price Return-18.42%0.23%
26-Week Price Return-10.67%-1.79%
52-Week Price Return-20.07%8.46%
Month-to-Date Return1.17%-3.73%
Year-to-Date Return-17.41%1.86%
10-Day Avg. Volume4.43M77.27M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.55M45.90M
3-Month Volatility26.94%20.67%
Beta0.950.31

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FIS

0.73%

Financial Services Industry

Max
39.28%
Q3
18.88%
Median
9.97%
Q1
4.03%
Min
-10.25%

FIS’s Return on Equity of 0.73% is in the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

UMC

10.76%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
47.13%
Q3
23.50%
Median
9.94%
Q1
0.86%
Min
-20.69%

UMC’s Return on Equity of 10.76% is on par with the norm for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

FIS vs. UMC: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FIS

1.09%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.16%
Q3
25.35%
Median
12.68%
Q1
6.11%
Min
-11.69%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry, FIS’s Net Profit Margin of 1.09% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

UMC

16.69%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
52.41%
Q3
23.88%
Median
10.17%
Q1
1.21%
Min
-32.15%

UMC’s Net Profit Margin of 16.69% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

FIS vs. UMC: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FIS

16.82%

Financial Services Industry

Max
75.57%
Q3
37.78%
Median
19.09%
Q1
10.04%
Min
-19.42%

FIS’s Operating Profit Margin of 16.82% is around the midpoint for the Financial Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

UMC

19.65%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
58.09%
Q3
27.54%
Median
11.18%
Q1
3.31%
Min
-28.36%

UMC’s Operating Profit Margin of 19.65% is around the midpoint for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

FIS vs. UMC: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFISUMC
Return on Equity (TTM)0.73%10.76%
Return on Assets (TTM)0.33%7.00%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)1.09%16.69%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)16.82%19.65%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)36.68%29.94%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FIS

0.59

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.83
Q3
2.70
Median
1.44
Q1
0.86
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

UMC

1.77

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
6.58
Q3
4.24
Median
2.73
Q1
2.13
Min
1.02

UMC’s Current Ratio of 1.77 falls into the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

FIS vs. UMC: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FIS

0.91

Financial Services Industry

Max
5.07
Q3
2.14
Median
0.66
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

UMC

0.20

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.48
Median
0.25
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

UMC’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.20 is typical for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

FIS vs. UMC: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FIS

5.52

Financial Services Industry

Max
136.23
Q3
56.08
Median
6.55
Q1
2.01
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

UMC

313.16

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
174.00
Q3
74.71
Median
26.06
Q1
6.43
Min
-7.80

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 313.16, UMC demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

FIS vs. UMC: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFISUMC
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.591.77
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.481.44
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.910.20
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)5.52313.16

Growth

Revenue Growth

FIS vs. UMC: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FIS vs. UMC: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FIS

2.37%

Financial Services Industry

Max
8.12%
Q3
3.37%
Median
1.70%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FIS’s Dividend Yield of 2.37% is consistent with its peers in the Financial Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

UMC

6.83%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
3.72%
Q3
1.51%
Median
0.69%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

UMC’s Dividend Yield of 6.83% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

FIS vs. UMC: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FIS

101.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
132.10%
Q3
64.32%
Median
18.23%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FIS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 101.00% is in the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

UMC

163.64%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
205.27%
Q3
88.01%
Median
27.13%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

UMC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 163.64% is in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

FIS vs. UMC: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFISUMC
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.37%6.83%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)101.00%163.64%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FIS

309.56

Financial Services Industry

Max
45.81
Q3
30.21
Median
16.29
Q1
10.14
Min
0.70

At 309.56, FIS’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Financial Services industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

UMC

13.87

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
106.30
Q3
61.93
Median
38.96
Q1
23.71
Min
13.06

In the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, UMC’s P/E Ratio of 13.87 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

FIS vs. UMC: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FIS

3.36

Financial Services Industry

Max
10.88
Q3
5.34
Median
2.64
Q1
1.24
Min
0.06

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

UMC

2.32

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
19.99
Q3
10.21
Median
5.23
Q1
2.88
Min
1.13

In the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, UMC’s P/S Ratio of 2.32 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

FIS vs. UMC: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FIS

3.02

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.93
Q3
3.78
Median
1.49
Q1
0.88
Min
0.08

FIS’s P/B Ratio of 3.02 is within the conventional range for the Financial Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

UMC

1.65

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
14.22
Q3
6.94
Median
4.29
Q1
1.99
Min
0.67

UMC’s P/B Ratio of 1.65 is in the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

FIS vs. UMC: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFISUMC
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)309.5613.87
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.362.32
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.021.65
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)18.9714.99