Seek Returns logo

FIS vs. GRMN: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FIS and GRMN, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolFISGRMN
Company NameFidelity National Information Services, Inc.Garmin Ltd.
CountryUnited StatesSwitzerland
GICS SectorFinancialsConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryFinancial ServicesHousehold Durables
Market Capitalization33.89 billion USD38.99 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 20, 2001December 8, 2000
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FIS and GRMN by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FIS vs. GRMN: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFISGRMN
5-Day Price Return3.63%-1.32%
13-Week Price Return-6.34%-11.47%
26-Week Price Return-13.34%7.69%
52-Week Price Return-24.50%-3.62%
Month-to-Date Return4.67%-5.24%
Year-to-Date Return-18.98%-1.71%
10-Day Avg. Volume5.42M1.36M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.85M0.86M
3-Month Volatility24.95%31.07%
Beta0.951.03

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FIS

1.03%

Financial Services Industry

Max
39.28%
Q3
18.88%
Median
9.97%
Q1
4.03%
Min
-10.25%

FIS’s Return on Equity of 1.03% is in the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

GRMN

19.26%

Household Durables Industry

Max
27.70%
Q3
17.40%
Median
12.87%
Q1
7.33%
Min
-5.50%

In the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, GRMN’s Return on Equity of 19.26% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

FIS vs. GRMN: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FIS

1.45%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.16%
Q3
25.35%
Median
12.68%
Q1
6.11%
Min
-11.69%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry, FIS’s Net Profit Margin of 1.45% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

GRMN

22.63%

Household Durables Industry

Max
16.37%
Q3
9.18%
Median
6.63%
Q1
3.85%
Min
-3.29%

GRMN’s Net Profit Margin of 22.63% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Household Durables industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

FIS vs. GRMN: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FIS

13.74%

Financial Services Industry

Max
75.57%
Q3
37.78%
Median
19.09%
Q1
10.04%
Min
-19.42%

FIS’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.74% is around the midpoint for the Financial Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

GRMN

25.61%

Household Durables Industry

Max
21.32%
Q3
12.25%
Median
9.93%
Q1
5.57%
Min
-1.07%

GRMN’s Operating Profit Margin of 25.61% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Household Durables industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

FIS vs. GRMN: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFISGRMN
Return on Equity (TTM)1.03%19.26%
Return on Assets (TTM)0.46%15.61%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)1.45%22.63%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)13.74%25.61%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)36.65%58.73%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FIS

0.53

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.83
Q3
2.70
Median
1.44
Q1
0.86
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

GRMN

3.32

Household Durables Industry

Max
6.09
Q3
3.79
Median
2.54
Q1
1.23
Min
0.83

GRMN’s Current Ratio of 3.32 aligns with the median group of the Household Durables industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

FIS vs. GRMN: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FIS

0.94

Financial Services Industry

Max
5.07
Q3
2.14
Median
0.66
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

GRMN

0.00

Household Durables Industry

Max
1.89
Q3
0.87
Median
0.34
Q1
0.19
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Household Durables industry, GRMN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

FIS vs. GRMN: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FIS

5.52

Financial Services Industry

Max
136.23
Q3
56.08
Median
6.55
Q1
2.01
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

GRMN

73.26

Household Durables Industry

Max
140.40
Q3
77.14
Median
24.53
Q1
5.69
Min
-17.01

GRMN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 73.26 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Household Durables industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

FIS vs. GRMN: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFISGRMN
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.533.32
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.412.01
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.940.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)5.5273.26

Growth

Revenue Growth

FIS vs. GRMN: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FIS vs. GRMN: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FIS

2.48%

Financial Services Industry

Max
8.12%
Q3
3.37%
Median
1.70%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FIS’s Dividend Yield of 2.48% is consistent with its peers in the Financial Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

GRMN

1.63%

Household Durables Industry

Max
9.61%
Q3
3.97%
Median
2.00%
Q1
0.18%
Min
0.00%

GRMN’s Dividend Yield of 1.63% is consistent with its peers in the Household Durables industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

FIS vs. GRMN: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FIS

99.68%

Financial Services Industry

Max
132.10%
Q3
64.32%
Median
18.23%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FIS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 99.68% is in the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

GRMN

40.42%

Household Durables Industry

Max
129.55%
Q3
65.55%
Median
42.15%
Q1
6.45%
Min
0.00%

GRMN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 40.42% is within the typical range for the Household Durables industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

FIS vs. GRMN: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFISGRMN
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.48%1.63%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)99.68%40.42%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FIS

220.70

Financial Services Industry

Max
45.81
Q3
30.21
Median
16.29
Q1
10.14
Min
0.70

At 220.70, FIS’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Financial Services industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

GRMN

24.77

Household Durables Industry

Max
33.67
Q3
19.33
Median
12.58
Q1
9.62
Min
6.48

A P/E Ratio of 24.77 places GRMN in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

FIS vs. GRMN: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FIS

3.21

Financial Services Industry

Max
10.88
Q3
5.34
Median
2.64
Q1
1.24
Min
0.06

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

GRMN

5.60

Household Durables Industry

Max
2.54
Q3
1.39
Median
0.90
Q1
0.54
Min
0.19

With a P/S Ratio of 5.60, GRMN trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Household Durables industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

FIS vs. GRMN: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FIS

2.49

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.93
Q3
3.78
Median
1.49
Q1
0.88
Min
0.08

FIS’s P/B Ratio of 2.49 is within the conventional range for the Financial Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

GRMN

5.57

Household Durables Industry

Max
3.26
Q3
2.01
Median
1.38
Q1
1.00
Min
0.58

At 5.57, GRMN’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Household Durables industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

FIS vs. GRMN: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFISGRMN
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)220.7024.77
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.215.60
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.495.57
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)17.7729.20