Seek Returns logo

FIS vs. GEN: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FIS and GEN, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolFISGEN
Company NameFidelity National Information Services, Inc.Gen Digital Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorFinancialsInformation Technology
GICS IndustryFinancial ServicesSoftware
Market Capitalization38.01 billion USD19.80 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateJune 20, 2001June 23, 1989
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FIS and GEN by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FIS vs. GEN: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFISGEN
5-Day Price Return3.85%13.76%
13-Week Price Return-7.75%10.67%
26-Week Price Return-12.18%16.02%
52-Week Price Return-4.41%30.63%
Month-to-Date Return-8.36%9.05%
Year-to-Date Return-9.90%17.46%
10-Day Avg. Volume4.81M4.93M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.64M4.44M
3-Month Volatility26.31%26.36%
Beta1.090.98

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FIS

0.73%

Financial Services Industry

Max
40.58%
Q3
20.06%
Median
10.67%
Q1
4.19%
Min
-10.31%

FIS’s Return on Equity of 0.73% is in the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

GEN

30.30%

Software Industry

Max
59.01%
Q3
21.98%
Median
7.15%
Q1
-11.12%
Min
-51.24%

In the upper quartile for the Software industry, GEN’s Return on Equity of 30.30% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

FIS vs. GEN: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FIS

1.09%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.86%
Q3
25.58%
Median
12.23%
Q1
6.64%
Min
-9.92%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry, FIS’s Net Profit Margin of 1.09% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

GEN

16.34%

Software Industry

Max
48.14%
Q3
18.23%
Median
5.60%
Q1
-9.22%
Min
-49.36%

GEN’s Net Profit Margin of 16.34% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Software industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

FIS vs. GEN: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FIS

17.58%

Financial Services Industry

Max
77.28%
Q3
37.68%
Median
18.17%
Q1
9.27%
Min
-8.19%

FIS’s Operating Profit Margin of 17.58% is around the midpoint for the Financial Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

GEN

40.15%

Software Industry

Max
57.34%
Q3
20.60%
Median
7.84%
Q1
-8.72%
Min
-51.37%

An Operating Profit Margin of 40.15% places GEN in the upper quartile for the Software industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

FIS vs. GEN: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFISGEN
Return on Equity (TTM)0.73%30.30%
Return on Assets (TTM)0.33%4.16%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)1.09%16.34%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)17.58%40.15%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)36.68%80.28%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FIS

0.59

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.58
Q3
2.59
Median
1.33
Q1
0.69
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

GEN

0.51

Software Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.31
Median
1.45
Q1
1.03
Min
0.24

GEN’s Current Ratio of 0.51 falls into the lower quartile for the Software industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

FIS vs. GEN: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FIS

0.91

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.96
Q3
2.10
Median
0.57
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

GEN

3.64

Software Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
0.90
Median
0.29
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.64, GEN operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Software industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

FIS vs. GEN: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FIS

6.19

Financial Services Industry

Max
136.23
Q3
56.08
Median
6.55
Q1
2.01
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

GEN

2.88

Software Industry

Max
67.02
Q3
19.86
Median
0.70
Q1
-12.50
Min
-53.00

GEN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.88 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Software industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

FIS vs. GEN: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFISGEN
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.590.51
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.480.46
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.913.64
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)6.192.88

Growth

Revenue Growth

FIS vs. GEN: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FIS vs. GEN: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FIS

2.20%

Financial Services Industry

Max
8.18%
Q3
3.60%
Median
1.56%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FIS’s Dividend Yield of 2.20% is consistent with its peers in the Financial Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

GEN

1.59%

Software Industry

Max
0.08%
Q3
0.03%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GEN’s Dividend Yield of 1.59% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Software industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

FIS vs. GEN: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FIS

101.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
155.56%
Q3
63.71%
Median
18.08%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FIS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 101.00% is in the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

GEN

48.68%

Software Industry

Max
1.32%
Q3
0.53%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

At 48.68%, GEN’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Software industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

FIS vs. GEN: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFISGEN
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.20%1.59%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)101.00%48.68%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FIS

333.55

Financial Services Industry

Max
63.23
Q3
32.10
Median
14.41
Q1
10.81
Min
0.37

At 333.55, FIS’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Financial Services industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

GEN

30.70

Software Industry

Max
149.35
Q3
100.21
Median
47.97
Q1
26.77
Min
11.68

GEN’s P/E Ratio of 30.70 is within the middle range for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FIS vs. GEN: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FIS

3.62

Financial Services Industry

Max
11.16
Q3
5.45
Median
2.61
Q1
1.25
Min
0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

GEN

5.02

Software Industry

Max
25.24
Q3
13.52
Median
8.15
Q1
4.87
Min
0.98

GEN’s P/S Ratio of 5.02 aligns with the market consensus for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

FIS vs. GEN: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FIS

3.02

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.09
Q3
3.79
Median
1.46
Q1
0.83
Min
0.04

FIS’s P/B Ratio of 3.02 is within the conventional range for the Financial Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

GEN

7.18

Software Industry

Max
30.95
Q3
14.91
Median
7.75
Q1
3.60
Min
0.38

GEN’s P/B Ratio of 7.18 is within the conventional range for the Software industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

FIS vs. GEN: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFISGEN
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)333.5530.70
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.625.02
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.027.18
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)20.4416.37