Seek Returns logo

FFIV vs. ZBRA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FFIV and ZBRA, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolFFIVZBRA
Company NameF5, Inc.Zebra Technologies Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustryCommunications EquipmentElectronic Equipment, Instruments & Components
Market Capitalization18.67 billion USD15.51 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateJune 4, 1999August 15, 1991
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FFIV and ZBRA by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FFIV vs. ZBRA: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFFIVZBRA
5-Day Price Return0.72%2.72%
13-Week Price Return8.28%-5.78%
26-Week Price Return22.05%7.95%
52-Week Price Return47.96%-17.27%
Month-to-Date Return0.55%2.64%
Year-to-Date Return29.23%-21.03%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.35M0.44M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.46M0.51M
3-Month Volatility23.39%36.86%
Beta1.021.69

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FFIV

20.29%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
32.30%
Q3
20.90%
Median
9.10%
Q1
4.29%
Min
-13.50%

FFIV’s Return on Equity of 20.29% is on par with the norm for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ZBRA

15.38%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
21.57%
Q3
13.27%
Median
8.55%
Q1
4.42%
Min
-4.21%

In the upper quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, ZBRA’s Return on Equity of 15.38% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

FFIV vs. ZBRA: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FFIV

22.06%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
23.65%
Q3
12.56%
Median
5.62%
Q1
2.50%
Min
-3.09%

A Net Profit Margin of 22.06% places FFIV in the upper quartile for the Communications Equipment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

ZBRA

10.56%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
17.31%
Q3
10.85%
Median
7.26%
Q1
3.13%
Min
-3.00%

ZBRA’s Net Profit Margin of 10.56% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

FFIV vs. ZBRA: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FFIV

24.84%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
25.23%
Q3
13.72%
Median
6.44%
Q1
3.00%
Min
-10.95%

An Operating Profit Margin of 24.84% places FFIV in the upper quartile for the Communications Equipment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

ZBRA

15.30%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
30.04%
Q3
15.08%
Median
9.55%
Q1
4.27%
Min
-3.83%

An Operating Profit Margin of 15.30% places ZBRA in the upper quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

FFIV vs. ZBRA: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFFIVZBRA
Return on Equity (TTM)20.29%15.38%
Return on Assets (TTM)11.34%6.96%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)22.06%10.56%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)24.84%15.30%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)81.03%48.59%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FFIV

1.60

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
3.33
Q3
2.13
Median
1.55
Q1
1.15
Min
0.91

FFIV’s Current Ratio of 1.60 aligns with the median group of the Communications Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ZBRA

1.46

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.57
Q3
2.85
Median
2.03
Q1
1.51
Min
0.62

ZBRA’s Current Ratio of 1.46 falls into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

FFIV vs. ZBRA: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Communications Equipment and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FFIV

0.00

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
1.44
Q3
0.86
Median
0.53
Q1
0.22
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Communications Equipment industry, FFIV’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

ZBRA

0.60

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
1.14
Q3
0.54
Median
0.30
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

ZBRA’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.60. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

FFIV vs. ZBRA: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Communications Equipment and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FFIV

55.49

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
55.49
Q3
34.19
Median
7.59
Q1
3.73
Min
-9.94

FFIV’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 55.49 is in the upper quartile for the Communications Equipment industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

ZBRA

7.83

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
79.05
Q3
36.62
Median
12.51
Q1
3.72
Min
-18.73

ZBRA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.83 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

FFIV vs. ZBRA: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFFIVZBRA
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.601.46
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.500.98
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.000.60
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)55.497.83

Growth

Revenue Growth

FFIV vs. ZBRA: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FFIV vs. ZBRA: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FFIV

0.00%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
8.13%
Q3
3.29%
Median
0.94%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FFIV currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ZBRA

0.00%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
5.36%
Q3
2.53%
Median
1.28%
Q1
0.16%
Min
0.00%

ZBRA currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

FFIV vs. ZBRA: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FFIV

0.00%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
111.16%
Q3
70.91%
Median
30.78%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FFIV has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ZBRA

0.00%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
218.94%
Q3
90.25%
Median
38.81%
Q1
3.69%
Min
0.00%

ZBRA has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

FFIV vs. ZBRA: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFFIVZBRA
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FFIV

28.31

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
103.74
Q3
61.65
Median
26.20
Q1
18.12
Min
4.19

FFIV’s P/E Ratio of 28.31 is within the middle range for the Communications Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ZBRA

27.45

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
74.74
Q3
42.40
Median
26.55
Q1
20.05
Min
10.12

ZBRA’s P/E Ratio of 27.45 is within the middle range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FFIV vs. ZBRA: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FFIV

6.25

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
6.86
Q3
6.24
Median
2.44
Q1
1.02
Min
0.48

FFIV’s P/S Ratio of 6.25 is in the upper echelon for the Communications Equipment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

ZBRA

2.90

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.79
Q3
3.58
Median
2.05
Q1
1.29
Min
0.20

ZBRA’s P/S Ratio of 2.90 aligns with the market consensus for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

FFIV vs. ZBRA: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FFIV

4.87

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
6.28
Q3
5.73
Median
3.32
Q1
2.02
Min
0.42

FFIV’s P/B Ratio of 4.87 is within the conventional range for the Communications Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ZBRA

4.34

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.92
Q3
3.80
Median
2.23
Q1
1.42
Min
0.44

ZBRA’s P/B Ratio of 4.34 is in the upper tier for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

FFIV vs. ZBRA: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Communications Equipment and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFFIVZBRA
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)28.3127.45
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)6.252.90
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.874.34
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)19.7817.63