FERG vs. FLS: Ferguson Enterprises vs. Flowserve Stock Comparison

November 11, 2026

How do Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) and Flowserve (FLS) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) and Flowserve (FLS) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but FERG is classified in Trading Companies & Distributors while FLS is classified in Machinery.

Company profile comparison for Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) and Flowserve (FLS)
Profile Item	FERG	FLS
Name	Ferguson Enterprises Inc.	Flowserve Corporation
Country/Region	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Industrials	Industrials
GICS Industry Group	Capital Goods	Capital Goods
GICS Industry	Trading Companies & Distributors	Machinery
GICS Sub-Industry	Trading Companies & Distributors	Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components
Market Capitalization	45.21 billion USD	10.19 billion USD
Currency	USD	USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	January 5, 2010	March 17, 1980
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

FERG

FLS

GSPC

Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) vs. Flowserve (FLS), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…

Trailing total returns for Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) and Flowserve (FLS). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…

Calendar-year total returns for Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) and Flowserve (FLS). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) and Flowserve (FLS)
Metric	FERG	FLS
Total Return (1Y)	6.92%	24.11%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)	20.73%	33.68%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)	13.21%	22.48%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

FERG

FLS

GSPC

Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) vs. Flowserve (FLS), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…

Distribution of monthly total returns for Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) and Flowserve (FLS). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) and Flowserve (FLS)
Metric	FERG	FLS
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)	32.85%	42.18%
Beta (5Y)	1.08	1.24
Max Drawdown (5Y)	-43.31%	-38.76%
Avg. Volume (3M)	1.46M	1.61M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

FERG and FLS are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) and Flowserve (FLS)
Metric	FERG	FLS
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)	0.08	0.47
Sortino Ratio (1Y)	0.12	0.70

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Capital efficiency shows on one side only: Flowserve (FLS) earns 11.61% on shareholders’ equity, ranked against its industry; Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) has no ROE this period.

FERG

Capital Goods industry group

Max: 40.55%
Q3: 19.29%
Median: 12.12%
Q1: 4.08%
Min: -17.12%
FERG: --

FLS

Capital Goods industry group

11.61%

Max: 40.55%
Q3: 19.29%
Median: 12.12%
FLS: 11.61%
Q1: 4.08%
Min: -17.12%

Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) vs. Flowserve (FLS): FERG does not report ROE, so it has no value marker; FLS is benchmarked against the Capital Goods industry group.

Net Margin (TTM)

Both Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) at 6.32% and Flowserve (FLS) at 5.42% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

FERG

Capital Goods industry group

6.32%

Max: 27.47%
Q3: 12.10%
FERG: 6.32%
Median: 6.30%
Q1: 1.40%
Min: -12.89%

FLS

Capital Goods industry group

5.42%

Max: 27.47%
Q3: 12.10%
Median: 6.30%
FLS: 5.42%
Q1: 1.40%
Min: -12.89%

Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) vs. Flowserve (FLS): A comparison of their net margin against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) at 10.16% and Flowserve (FLS) at 13.45% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

FERG

Capital Goods industry group

10.16%

Max: 36.60%
Q3: 18.33%
Median: 11.12%
FERG: 10.16%
Q1: 5.14%
Min: -12.63%

FLS

Capital Goods industry group

13.45%

Max: 36.60%
Q3: 18.33%
FLS: 13.45%
Median: 11.12%
Q1: 5.14%
Min: -12.63%

Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) vs. Flowserve (FLS): A comparison of their operating margin against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) and Flowserve (FLS)
Metric	FERG	FLS
ROE (TTM)	--	11.61%
ROA (TTM)	--	6.36%
Net Margin (TTM)	6.32%	5.42%
Operating Margin (TTM)	10.16%	13.45%
Gross Margin (TTM)	30.63%	35.30%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Only one side can be read here: Flowserve (FLS) reports revenue growth of 3.76%, ranked against its industry; Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) has no revenue growth figure this period.

Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) vs. Flowserve (FLS): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Both Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) at 19.11% and Flowserve (FLS) at 23.36% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) vs. Flowserve (FLS): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) and Flowserve (FLS)
Metric	FERG	FLS
Revenue Growth (YoY)	--	3.76%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)	--	9.37%
EPS Growth (YoY)	19.11%	23.36%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)	--	22.39%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Both Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) at 1.73 and Flowserve (FLS) at 2.10 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.

FERG

Capital Goods industry group

1.73

Max: 5.22
Q3: 2.95
Median: 2.08
FERG: 1.73
Q1: 1.43
Min: 0.36

FLS

Capital Goods industry group

2.10

Max: 5.22
Q3: 2.95
FLS: 2.10
Median: 2.08
Q1: 1.43
Min: 0.36

Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) vs. Flowserve (FLS): A comparison of their current ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Both Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) at 1.11 and Flowserve (FLS) at 0.95 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.

FERG

Capital Goods industry group

1.11

Max: 2.33
Q3: 1.12
FERG: 1.11
Median: 0.60
Q1: 0.29
Min: 0.00

FLS

Capital Goods industry group

0.95

Max: 2.33
Q3: 1.12
FLS: 0.95
Median: 0.60
Q1: 0.29
Min: 0.00

Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) vs. Flowserve (FLS): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) and Flowserve (FLS)
Metric	FERG	FLS
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.73	2.10
Debt / Equity (MRQ)	1.11	0.95
Net Debt / EBITDA	2.10	2.08

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) at 1.80% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Flowserve (FLS) at 1.11% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, FERG the richer one.

FERG

Capital Goods industry group

1.80%

Max: 2.66%
FERG: 1.80%
Q3: 1.14%
Median: 0.24%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

FLS

Capital Goods industry group

1.11%

Max: 2.66%
Q3: 1.14%
FLS: 1.11%
Median: 0.24%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) vs. Flowserve (FLS): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Both Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) at 33.57% and Flowserve (FLS) at 43.50% pay out an above-typical share of earnings for their industries, leaving thinner cover if profits dip.

FERG

Capital Goods industry group

33.57%

Max: 67.39%
FERG: 33.57%
Q3: 28.02%
Median: 6.86%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

FLS

Capital Goods industry group

43.50%

Max: 67.39%
FLS: 43.50%
Q3: 28.02%
Median: 6.86%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) vs. Flowserve (FLS): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) and Flowserve (FLS)
Metric	FERG	FLS
Dividend Yield (TTM)	1.80%	1.11%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	33.57%	43.50%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) at 23.00 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Flowserve (FLS) at 40.19 sits in the richer quartile — FLS needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.

FERG

Capital Goods industry group

23.00

Max: 59.38
Q3: 35.92
Median: 25.41
FERG: 23.00
Q1: 19.47
Min: 3.03

FLS

Capital Goods industry group

40.19

Max: 59.38
FLS: 40.19
Q3: 35.92
Median: 25.41
Q1: 19.47
Min: 3.03

Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) vs. Flowserve (FLS): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

On P/S ratio, both Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) at 1.44 and Flowserve (FLS) at 2.17 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.

FERG

Capital Goods industry group

1.44

Max: 7.54
Q3: 3.76
Median: 2.15
FERG: 1.44
Q1: 1.03
Min: 0.03

FLS

Capital Goods industry group

2.17

Max: 7.54
Q3: 3.76
FLS: 2.17
Median: 2.15
Q1: 1.03
Min: 0.03

Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) vs. Flowserve (FLS): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Flowserve (FLS) at 4.40 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) at 7.29 carries an above-peer premium to book — FERG is pricier on assets.

FERG

Capital Goods industry group

7.29

Max: 9.66
FERG: 7.29
Q3: 5.00
Median: 3.12
Q1: 1.81
Min: -1.08

FLS

Capital Goods industry group

4.40

Max: 9.66
Q3: 5.00
FLS: 4.40
Median: 3.12
Q1: 1.81
Min: -1.08

Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) vs. Flowserve (FLS): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) and Flowserve (FLS)
Metric	FERG	FLS
P/E Ratio (TTM)	23.00	40.19
P/S Ratio (TTM)	1.44	2.17
P/B Ratio (MRQ)	7.29	4.40
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)	--	3.62%