FDS vs. PAYP: FactSet Research Systems vs. PayPay Stock Comparison

Company Profile

FactSet Research Systems (FDS) and PayPay (PAYP) both fall under the Financial Services industry group, but FDS is classified in Capital Markets while PAYP is classified in Financial Services.

FactSet Research Systems (FDS) has been public since June 28, 1996, giving it decades of market history across multiple cycles, while PayPay (PAYP) listed only on March 12, 2026 and lacks comparable through-cycle data.

FactSet Research Systems (FDS) trades as ordinary local shares, while PayPay (PAYP) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Both FDS and PAYP need 1-year volatility and 1-year return to plot risk-return positioning.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

FactSet Research Systems (FDS) at 25.48% sits in the top ROE quartile, while PayPay (PAYP) at 18.80% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for FDS.

Both FactSet Research Systems (FDS) at 21.54% and PayPay (PAYP) at 15.85% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

Both FactSet Research Systems (FDS) at 22.22% and PayPay (PAYP) at 32.79% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Both FactSet Research Systems (FDS) at 6.65% and PayPay (PAYP) at 25.85% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

PayPay (PAYP) at 230.06% clears its industry range for EPS growth, a much stronger earnings trajectory than FactSet Research Systems (FDS) at -6.30%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: FactSet Research Systems (FDS) in Financial Services and PayPay (PAYP) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: FactSet Research Systems (FDS) in Financial Services and PayPay (PAYP) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

PayPay (PAYP) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile FactSet Research Systems (FDS) reports a yield of 1.33%, ranking against industry peers normally.

PayPay (PAYP) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile FactSet Research Systems (FDS) reports a payout of 31.02%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Both FactSet Research Systems (FDS) at 22.50 and PayPay (PAYP) at 23.30 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.

PayPay (PAYP) at 0.02 looks cheap on sales in the lower P/S ratio quartile, while FactSet Research Systems (FDS) at 4.67 looks rich in the upper quartile — a clear gap in price per dollar of revenue.

Both FactSet Research Systems (FDS) at 5.77 and PayPay (PAYP) at 3.75 carry a premium to book value versus peers, sitting in the upper P/B ratio quartile of their industries.

Valuation Metrics