FDS vs. NLY: FactSet Research Systems vs. Annaly Capital Management Stock Comparison

Company Profile

FactSet Research Systems (FDS) and Annaly Capital Management (NLY) both fall under the Financial Services industry group, but FDS is classified in Capital Markets while NLY is classified in Mortgage Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs).

FactSet Research Systems (FDS) is an ordinary operating company, while Annaly Capital Management (NLY) is a REIT — read its payout ratio and P/E alongside FFO (funds from operations) rather than comparing them directly to FDS’s multiples.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Annaly Capital Management (NLY) is heavily traded at around 10.28M shares per day, whereas FactSet Research Systems (FDS) sees a more moderate 803.71K — larger orders in the latter may require more patience and tighter control over order sizing.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

FactSet Research Systems (FDS) at 25.48% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Annaly Capital Management (NLY) at 7.35% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for FDS.

Annaly Capital Management (NLY) at 80.27% converts revenue to bottom-line profit above its industry’s benchmark range, while FactSet Research Systems (FDS) at 21.54% keeps roughly the typical share for its industry.

Annaly Capital Management (NLY) at 107.33% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of FactSet Research Systems (FDS) at 22.22%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Annaly Capital Management (NLY) at 87.29% clears its industry range for revenue growth, far stronger top-line momentum than FactSet Research Systems (FDS) at 6.65%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.

Annaly Capital Management (NLY) at 80.25% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while FactSet Research Systems (FDS) at -6.30% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for NLY.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: FactSet Research Systems (FDS) in Financial Services and Annaly Capital Management (NLY) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: FactSet Research Systems (FDS) in Financial Services and Annaly Capital Management (NLY) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

FactSet Research Systems (FDS) at 1.33% pays an industry-typical yield; Annaly Capital Management (NLY) at 15.38% is above its entire peer range — the higher number, but one that calls for a look at payout sustainability before treating it as an advantage.

Annaly Capital Management (NLY) reports payout ratio above 100% at 201.39%, meaning dividends exceeded current-period earnings and sustainability needs extra context. Meanwhile FactSet Research Systems (FDS) reports 31.02%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Both FactSet Research Systems (FDS) at 22.50 and Annaly Capital Management (NLY) at 13.02 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.

Both look expensive on sales: FactSet Research Systems (FDS) at 4.67 sits in the upper P/S ratio quartile, and Annaly Capital Management (NLY) at 10.62 prices even higher, above its industry range.

Annaly Capital Management (NLY) at 1.05 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while FactSet Research Systems (FDS) at 5.77 carries an above-peer premium to book — FDS is pricier on assets.

Valuation Metrics