Seek Returns

FANG vs. IMO: Diamondback Energy vs. Imperial Oil Stock Comparison

How do Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Imperial Oil (IMO) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Imperial Oil (IMO) both belong to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, though FANG is classified under Oil & Gas Exploration & Production while IMO falls under Integrated Oil & Gas.

Company profile comparison for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Imperial Oil (IMO)
Profile ItemFANGIMO
NameDiamondback Energy Inc.Imperial Oil Limited
Country/RegionUnited StatesCanada
GICS SectorEnergyEnergy
GICS Industry GroupEnergyEnergy
GICS IndustryOil, Gas & Consumable FuelsOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
GICS Sub-IndustryOil & Gas Exploration & ProductionIntegrated Oil & Gas
Market Capitalization49.96 billion USD58.92 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNasdaqNYSE American
Listing DateOctober 12, 2012March 17, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

FANG
IMO
GSPC
Loading price history…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Imperial Oil (IMO), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Imperial Oil (IMO). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Imperial Oil (IMO). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Imperial Oil (IMO)
MetricFANGIMO
Total Return (1Y)26.99%35.68%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)8.52%34.62%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)14.17%32.18%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

FANG
IMO
GSPC
Loading price history…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Imperial Oil (IMO), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Imperial Oil (IMO). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Imperial Oil (IMO)
MetricFANGIMO
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)33.77%30.00%
Beta (5Y)0.530.58
Max Drawdown (5Y)-42.10%-29.72%
Avg. Volume (3M)2.38M573.33K

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
FANG and IMO are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Imperial Oil (IMO)
MetricFANGIMO
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)0.671.05
Sortino Ratio (1Y)0.971.51

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Imperial Oil (IMO) at 25.24% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 4.86% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for IMO.

FANG

Energy industry group

4.86%

Max
53.85%
Q3
24.79%
Median
12.85%
FANG
4.86%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%

IMO

Energy industry group

25.24%

Max
53.85%
IMO
25.24%
Q3
24.79%
Median
12.85%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%
Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Imperial Oil (IMO): A comparison of their ROE against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Both Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 11.62% and Imperial Oil (IMO) at 10.88% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

FANG

Energy industry group

11.62%

Max
56.92%
Q3
22.92%
FANG
11.62%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%

IMO

Energy industry group

10.88%

Max
56.92%
Q3
22.92%
IMO
10.88%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%
Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Imperial Oil (IMO): A comparison of their net margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 44.95% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Imperial Oil (IMO) at 21.36%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

FANG

Energy industry group

44.95%

Max
71.31%
FANG
44.95%
Q3
33.75%
Median
18.73%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%

IMO

Energy industry group

21.36%

Max
71.31%
Q3
33.75%
IMO
21.36%
Median
18.73%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%
Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Imperial Oil (IMO): A comparison of their operating margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Imperial Oil (IMO)
MetricFANGIMO
ROE (TTM)4.86%25.24%
ROA (TTM)2.07%10.93%
Net Margin (TTM)11.62%10.88%
Operating Margin (TTM)44.95%21.36%
Gross Margin (TTM)73.62%20.08%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 35.44% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Imperial Oil (IMO) at -7.42% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in revenue momentum.

Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Imperial Oil (IMO): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Imperial Oil (IMO) at -28.24% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at -63.10% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.

Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Imperial Oil (IMO): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Imperial Oil (IMO)
MetricFANGIMO
Revenue Growth (YoY)35.44%-7.42%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)15.99%-7.56%
EPS Growth (YoY)-63.10%-28.24%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)-38.48%-17.26%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Imperial Oil (IMO) at 1.30 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 0.55 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for FANG.

FANG

Energy industry group

0.55

Max
3.64
Q3
2.21
Median
1.41
Q1
0.88
FANG
0.55
Min
0.24

IMO

Energy industry group

1.30

Max
3.64
Q3
2.21
Median
1.41
IMO
1.30
Q1
0.88
Min
0.24
Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Imperial Oil (IMO): A comparison of their current ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Both Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 0.29 and Imperial Oil (IMO) at 0.17 keep leverage in the lower quartile of their industries, with less balance-sheet debt relative to equity than most peers.

FANG

Energy industry group

0.29

Max
1.75
Q3
0.93
Median
0.54
Q1
0.30
FANG
0.29
Min
0.00

IMO

Energy industry group

0.17

Max
1.75
Q3
0.93
Median
0.54
Q1
0.30
IMO
0.17
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Imperial Oil (IMO): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Imperial Oil (IMO)
MetricFANGIMO
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.551.30
Debt / Equity (MRQ)0.290.17
Net Debt / EBITDA0.990.13

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 2.47% and Imperial Oil (IMO) at 2.65% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

FANG

Energy industry group

2.47%

Max
8.57%
Q3
3.58%
FANG
2.47%
Median
1.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

IMO

Energy industry group

2.65%

Max
8.57%
Q3
3.58%
IMO
2.65%
Median
1.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Imperial Oil (IMO): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Imperial Oil (IMO) at 26.49% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 57.20% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.

FANG

Energy industry group

57.20%

Max
133.24%
FANG
57.20%
Q3
53.31%
Median
25.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

IMO

Energy industry group

26.49%

Max
133.24%
Q3
53.31%
IMO
26.49%
Median
25.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Imperial Oil (IMO): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Imperial Oil (IMO)
MetricFANGIMO
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.47%2.65%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)57.20%26.49%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Imperial Oil (IMO) at 13.78 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 24.09 sits in the richer quartile — FANG needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.

FANG

Energy industry group

24.09

Max
39.54
FANG
24.09
Q3
21.72
Median
12.19
Q1
7.71
Min
2.99

IMO

Energy industry group

13.78

Max
39.54
Q3
21.72
IMO
13.78
Median
12.19
Q1
7.71
Min
2.99
Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Imperial Oil (IMO): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

On P/S ratio, both Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 2.83 and Imperial Oil (IMO) at 1.06 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.

FANG

Energy industry group

2.83

Max
5.40
Q3
2.85
FANG
2.83
Median
1.69
Q1
0.88
Min
0.00

IMO

Energy industry group

1.06

Max
5.40
Q3
2.85
Median
1.69
IMO
1.06
Q1
0.88
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Imperial Oil (IMO): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 1.28 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Imperial Oil (IMO) at 3.38 carries an above-peer premium to book — IMO is pricier on assets.

FANG

Energy industry group

1.28

Max
4.21
Q3
2.38
Median
1.51
FANG
1.28
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01

IMO

Energy industry group

3.38

Max
4.21
IMO
3.38
Q3
2.38
Median
1.51
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01
Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Imperial Oil (IMO): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Imperial Oil (IMO)
MetricFANGIMO
P/E Ratio (TTM)24.0913.78
P/S Ratio (TTM)2.831.06
P/B Ratio (MRQ)1.283.38
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)12.09%9.90%