Seek Returns logo

F vs. MGA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at F and MGA, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolFMGA
Company NameFord Motor CompanyMagna International Inc.
CountryUnited StatesCanada
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryAutomobilesAutomobile Components
Market Capitalization45.73 billion USD12.54 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 1, 1972October 5, 1984
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of F and MGA by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

F vs. MGA: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFMGA
5-Day Price Return0.44%-0.60%
13-Week Price Return6.88%20.18%
26-Week Price Return22.89%10.53%
52-Week Price Return7.18%9.35%
Month-to-Date Return3.79%8.47%
Year-to-Date Return16.06%2.58%
10-Day Avg. Volume57.26M0.92M
3-Month Avg. Volume90.59M1.51M
3-Month Volatility25.52%27.61%
Beta1.561.08

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

F

7.05%

Automobiles Industry

Max
25.70%
Q3
12.88%
Median
6.92%
Q1
0.71%
Min
-15.89%

F’s Return on Equity of 7.05% is on par with the norm for the Automobiles industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

MGA

10.10%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
22.61%
Q3
12.61%
Median
8.05%
Q1
4.99%
Min
-4.24%

MGA’s Return on Equity of 10.10% is on par with the norm for the Automobile Components industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

F vs. MGA: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

F

1.70%

Automobiles Industry

Max
9.92%
Q3
5.78%
Median
3.23%
Q1
0.11%
Min
-5.31%

F’s Net Profit Margin of 1.70% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Automobiles industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

MGA

2.91%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
14.35%
Q3
7.20%
Median
5.37%
Q1
2.20%
Min
-3.89%

MGA’s Net Profit Margin of 2.91% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Automobile Components industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

F vs. MGA: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

F

1.59%

Automobiles Industry

Max
13.07%
Q3
7.22%
Median
5.29%
Q1
0.43%
Min
-4.46%

F’s Operating Profit Margin of 1.59% is around the midpoint for the Automobiles industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

MGA

4.33%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
18.98%
Q3
10.24%
Median
7.27%
Q1
4.13%
Min
0.23%

MGA’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.33% is around the midpoint for the Automobile Components industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

F vs. MGA: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFMGA
Return on Equity (TTM)7.05%10.10%
Return on Assets (TTM)1.10%3.76%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)1.70%2.91%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)1.59%4.33%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)7.19%13.83%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

F

1.10

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.19
Q3
1.54
Median
1.26
Q1
1.09
Min
0.48

F’s Current Ratio of 1.10 aligns with the median group of the Automobiles industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MGA

1.16

Automobile Components Industry

Max
4.06
Q3
2.51
Median
1.80
Q1
1.47
Min
0.79

MGA’s Current Ratio of 1.16 falls into the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

F vs. MGA: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobiles and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

F

3.50

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.34
Q3
1.13
Median
0.58
Q1
0.28
Min
0.06

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.50, F operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Automobiles industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

MGA

0.48

Automobile Components Industry

Max
1.25
Q3
0.63
Median
0.37
Q1
0.18
Min
0.00

MGA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.48 is typical for the Automobile Components industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

F vs. MGA: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobiles and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

F

0.73

Automobiles Industry

Max
77.87
Q3
42.86
Median
13.88
Q1
2.13
Min
-49.07

F’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 0.73 is a critical concern. A value below 1.0 means operating earnings are insufficient to cover interest expenses, indicating severe financial strain and high default risk.

MGA

8.66

Automobile Components Industry

Max
88.53
Q3
38.84
Median
11.36
Q1
5.08
Min
-21.51

MGA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 8.66 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Automobile Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

F vs. MGA: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFMGA
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.101.16
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.950.80
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)3.500.48
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)0.738.66

Growth

Revenue Growth

F vs. MGA: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

F vs. MGA: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

F

6.48%

Automobiles Industry

Max
10.71%
Q3
5.39%
Median
3.14%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 6.48%, F offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Automobiles industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

MGA

4.35%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
6.03%
Q3
3.38%
Median
2.62%
Q1
1.38%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 4.35%, MGA offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Automobile Components industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

F vs. MGA: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

F

59.55%

Automobiles Industry

Max
114.43%
Q3
59.30%
Median
37.15%
Q1
16.40%
Min
0.00%

F’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 59.55% is in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

MGA

44.88%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
95.56%
Q3
55.95%
Median
37.10%
Q1
27.90%
Min
0.00%

MGA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 44.88% is within the typical range for the Automobile Components industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

F vs. MGA: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFMGA
Dividend Yield (TTM)6.48%4.35%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)59.55%44.88%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

F

14.61

Automobiles Industry

Max
27.69
Q3
19.99
Median
9.85
Q1
6.60
Min
4.25

F’s P/E Ratio of 14.61 is within the middle range for the Automobiles industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MGA

10.33

Automobile Components Industry

Max
26.62
Q3
17.42
Median
13.22
Q1
11.14
Min
2.52

In the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry, MGA’s P/E Ratio of 10.33 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

F vs. MGA: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

F

0.25

Automobiles Industry

Max
1.52
Q3
0.84
Median
0.41
Q1
0.23
Min
0.08

F’s P/S Ratio of 0.25 aligns with the market consensus for the Automobiles industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MGA

0.30

Automobile Components Industry

Max
1.81
Q3
0.97
Median
0.71
Q1
0.38
Min
0.08

In the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry, MGA’s P/S Ratio of 0.30 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

F vs. MGA: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

F

0.96

Automobiles Industry

Max
4.25
Q3
2.00
Median
0.87
Q1
0.46
Min
0.19

F’s P/B Ratio of 0.96 is within the conventional range for the Automobiles industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

MGA

0.85

Automobile Components Industry

Max
2.49
Q3
1.49
Median
0.93
Q1
0.78
Min
0.40

MGA’s P/B Ratio of 0.85 is within the conventional range for the Automobile Components industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

F vs. MGA: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobiles and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFMGA
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)14.6110.33
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.250.30
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)0.960.85
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)4.556.83