Seek Returns logo

F vs. LI: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at F and LI, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

F is a standard domestic listing, while LI trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolFLI
Company NameFord Motor CompanyLi Auto Inc.
CountryUnited StatesChina
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryAutomobilesAutomobiles
Market Capitalization45.53 billion USD25.20 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateJune 1, 1972July 30, 2020
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of F and LI by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

F vs. LI: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFLI
5-Day Price Return1.42%0.73%
13-Week Price Return8.44%-13.87%
26-Week Price Return23.54%7.47%
52-Week Price Return16.02%142.14%
Month-to-Date Return3.34%-6.41%
Year-to-Date Return15.56%3.41%
10-Day Avg. Volume68.21M24.98M
3-Month Avg. Volume99.20M17.25M
3-Month Volatility25.54%49.59%
Beta1.561.35

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

F

7.05%

Automobiles Industry

Max
25.70%
Q3
12.88%
Median
6.92%
Q1
0.71%
Min
-15.89%

F’s Return on Equity of 7.05% is on par with the norm for the Automobiles industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

LI

11.89%

Automobiles Industry

Max
25.70%
Q3
12.88%
Median
6.92%
Q1
0.71%
Min
-15.89%

LI’s Return on Equity of 11.89% is on par with the norm for the Automobiles industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

F vs. LI: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Automobiles industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

F

1.70%

Automobiles Industry

Max
9.92%
Q3
5.78%
Median
3.23%
Q1
0.11%
Min
-5.31%

F’s Net Profit Margin of 1.70% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Automobiles industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

LI

5.59%

Automobiles Industry

Max
9.92%
Q3
5.78%
Median
3.23%
Q1
0.11%
Min
-5.31%

LI’s Net Profit Margin of 5.59% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Automobiles industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

F vs. LI: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Automobiles industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

F

1.59%

Automobiles Industry

Max
13.07%
Q3
7.22%
Median
5.29%
Q1
0.43%
Min
-4.46%

F’s Operating Profit Margin of 1.59% is around the midpoint for the Automobiles industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

LI

5.44%

Automobiles Industry

Max
13.07%
Q3
7.22%
Median
5.29%
Q1
0.43%
Min
-4.46%

LI’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.44% is around the midpoint for the Automobiles industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

F vs. LI: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Automobiles industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFLI
Return on Equity (TTM)7.05%11.89%
Return on Assets (TTM)1.10%5.18%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)1.70%5.59%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)1.59%5.44%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)7.19%20.51%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

F

1.10

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.19
Q3
1.54
Median
1.26
Q1
1.09
Min
0.48

F’s Current Ratio of 1.10 aligns with the median group of the Automobiles industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

LI

1.87

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.19
Q3
1.54
Median
1.26
Q1
1.09
Min
0.48

LI’s Current Ratio of 1.87 is in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

F vs. LI: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Automobiles industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

F

3.50

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.34
Q3
1.13
Median
0.58
Q1
0.28
Min
0.06

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.50, F operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Automobiles industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

LI

0.13

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.34
Q3
1.13
Median
0.58
Q1
0.28
Min
0.06

Falling into the lower quartile for the Automobiles industry, LI’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.13 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

F vs. LI: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Automobiles industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

F

0.73

Automobiles Industry

Max
77.87
Q3
42.86
Median
13.88
Q1
2.13
Min
-49.07

F’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 0.73 is a critical concern. A value below 1.0 means operating earnings are insufficient to cover interest expenses, indicating severe financial strain and high default risk.

LI

-16.94

Automobiles Industry

Max
77.87
Q3
42.86
Median
13.88
Q1
2.13
Min
-49.07

LI has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -16.94. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

F vs. LI: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Automobiles industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFLI
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.101.87
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.951.64
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)3.500.13
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)0.73-16.94

Growth

Revenue Growth

F vs. LI: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

F vs. LI: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

F

6.67%

Automobiles Industry

Max
10.71%
Q3
5.39%
Median
3.14%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 6.67%, F offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Automobiles industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

LI

0.00%

Automobiles Industry

Max
10.71%
Q3
5.39%
Median
3.14%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LI currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

F vs. LI: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Automobiles industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

F

59.55%

Automobiles Industry

Max
114.43%
Q3
59.30%
Median
37.15%
Q1
16.40%
Min
0.00%

F’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 59.55% is in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

LI

0.00%

Automobiles Industry

Max
114.43%
Q3
59.30%
Median
37.15%
Q1
16.40%
Min
0.00%

LI has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

F vs. LI: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Automobiles industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFLI
Dividend Yield (TTM)6.67%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)59.55%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

F

14.20

Automobiles Industry

Max
27.69
Q3
19.99
Median
9.85
Q1
6.60
Min
4.25

F’s P/E Ratio of 14.20 is within the middle range for the Automobiles industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

LI

21.30

Automobiles Industry

Max
27.69
Q3
19.99
Median
9.85
Q1
6.60
Min
4.25

A P/E Ratio of 21.30 places LI in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

F vs. LI: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Automobiles industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

F

0.24

Automobiles Industry

Max
1.52
Q3
0.84
Median
0.41
Q1
0.23
Min
0.08

F’s P/S Ratio of 0.24 aligns with the market consensus for the Automobiles industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

LI

1.19

Automobiles Industry

Max
1.52
Q3
0.84
Median
0.41
Q1
0.23
Min
0.08

LI’s P/S Ratio of 1.19 is in the upper echelon for the Automobiles industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

F vs. LI: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Automobiles industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

F

0.96

Automobiles Industry

Max
4.25
Q3
2.00
Median
0.87
Q1
0.46
Min
0.19

F’s P/B Ratio of 0.96 is within the conventional range for the Automobiles industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

LI

2.70

Automobiles Industry

Max
4.25
Q3
2.00
Median
0.87
Q1
0.46
Min
0.19

LI’s P/B Ratio of 2.70 is in the upper tier for the Automobiles industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

F vs. LI: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Automobiles industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFLI
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)14.2021.30
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.241.19
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)0.962.70
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)4.428.74