EXR vs. GLPI: Extra Space Storage vs. Gaming and Leisure Properties Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Extra Space Storage (EXR) and Gaming and Leisure Properties (GLPI) both belong to the Specialized REITs industry, though EXR is classified under Self-Storage REITs while GLPI falls under Other Specialized REITs.

Both Extra Space Storage (EXR) and Gaming and Leisure Properties (GLPI) are REITs — read their payout ratios and P/E alongside FFO (funds from operations) rather than at face value.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Gaming and Leisure Properties (GLPI) at 18.69% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Extra Space Storage (EXR) at 7.71% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for GLPI.

Neither Extra Space Storage (EXR) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) nor Gaming and Leisure Properties (GLPI) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) is well served by net margin: heavy depreciation makes net income a poor profitability proxy in their businesses, where FFO-based measures are the standard read.

Neither side reports a meaningful operating margin: for Extra Space Storage (EXR) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) and Gaming and Leisure Properties (GLPI) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs), funding costs are part of the core business, so net margin and ROE are the cleaner profitability reads.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Both Extra Space Storage (EXR) at 3.70% and Gaming and Leisure Properties (GLPI) at 4.13% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

EPS growth isn't a meaningful figure for either Extra Space Storage (EXR) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) or Gaming and Leisure Properties (GLPI) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) under our convention.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Extra Space Storage (EXR) at 0.87 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Gaming and Leisure Properties (GLPI) at 34.39 sits above its industry’s typical mid-range — comfortable liquidity, though possibly with more idle current assets relative to peers.

Both Extra Space Storage (EXR) at 1.03 and Gaming and Leisure Properties (GLPI) at 1.57 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Gaming and Leisure Properties (GLPI) at 8.11% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Extra Space Storage (EXR) at 4.05% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, GLPI the richer one.

An earnings-based payout ratio fits neither Extra Space Storage (EXR) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) nor Gaming and Leisure Properties (GLPI) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs): their distributions are mandated and conventionally measured against FFO, so the accounting-earnings ratio overstates both.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

P/E ratio is not a meaningful valuation yardstick for either Extra Space Storage (EXR) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) or Gaming and Leisure Properties (GLPI) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs): depreciation suppresses reported earnings in their businesses, and price-to-FFO is the conventional yardstick instead.

Gaming and Leisure Properties (GLPI) at 6.88 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Extra Space Storage (EXR) at 9.86 sits in the pricier quartile — EXR costs more per dollar of sales.

Gaming and Leisure Properties (GLPI) at 2.28 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Extra Space Storage (EXR) at 2.59 carries an above-peer premium to book — EXR is pricier on assets.

Valuation Metrics