Seek Returns logo

EXP vs. MLM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at EXP and MLM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolEXPMLM
Company NameEagle Materials Inc.Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorMaterialsMaterials
GICS IndustryConstruction MaterialsConstruction Materials
Market Capitalization7.83 billion USD37.39 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateApril 12, 1994February 17, 1994
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of EXP and MLM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

EXP vs. MLM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolEXPMLM
5-Day Price Return7.57%3.30%
13-Week Price Return0.69%12.12%
26-Week Price Return-7.20%13.68%
52-Week Price Return0.78%18.09%
Month-to-Date Return7.55%7.86%
Year-to-Date Return-2.25%20.05%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.39M0.54M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.43M0.44M
3-Month Volatility37.52%21.85%
Beta1.341.03

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

EXP

30.83%

Construction Materials Industry

Max
24.78%
Q3
14.96%
Median
10.37%
Q1
4.14%
Min
-2.94%

EXP’s Return on Equity of 30.83% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Construction Materials industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

MLM

11.88%

Construction Materials Industry

Max
24.78%
Q3
14.96%
Median
10.37%
Q1
4.14%
Min
-2.94%

MLM’s Return on Equity of 11.88% is on par with the norm for the Construction Materials industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

EXP vs. MLM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Construction Materials industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

EXP

19.81%

Construction Materials Industry

Max
28.01%
Q3
15.18%
Median
9.09%
Q1
3.32%
Min
-4.30%

A Net Profit Margin of 19.81% places EXP in the upper quartile for the Construction Materials industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

MLM

16.47%

Construction Materials Industry

Max
28.01%
Q3
15.18%
Median
9.09%
Q1
3.32%
Min
-4.30%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.47% places MLM in the upper quartile for the Construction Materials industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

EXP vs. MLM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Construction Materials industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

EXP

25.30%

Construction Materials Industry

Max
31.67%
Q3
18.49%
Median
11.57%
Q1
7.82%
Min
-1.44%

An Operating Profit Margin of 25.30% places EXP in the upper quartile for the Construction Materials industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

MLM

23.04%

Construction Materials Industry

Max
31.67%
Q3
18.49%
Median
11.57%
Q1
7.82%
Min
-1.44%

An Operating Profit Margin of 23.04% places MLM in the upper quartile for the Construction Materials industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

EXP vs. MLM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Construction Materials industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolEXPMLM
Return on Equity (TTM)30.83%11.88%
Return on Assets (TTM)14.12%6.25%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)19.81%16.47%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)25.30%23.04%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)29.38%29.44%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

EXP

2.73

Construction Materials Industry

Max
5.14
Q3
2.89
Median
1.92
Q1
1.25
Min
0.79

EXP’s Current Ratio of 2.73 aligns with the median group of the Construction Materials industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MLM

2.35

Construction Materials Industry

Max
5.14
Q3
2.89
Median
1.92
Q1
1.25
Min
0.79

MLM’s Current Ratio of 2.35 aligns with the median group of the Construction Materials industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

EXP vs. MLM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Construction Materials industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

EXP

0.88

Construction Materials Industry

Max
0.99
Q3
0.72
Median
0.55
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

EXP’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Construction Materials industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.88. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

MLM

0.58

Construction Materials Industry

Max
0.99
Q3
0.72
Median
0.55
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

MLM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.58 is typical for the Construction Materials industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

EXP vs. MLM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Construction Materials industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

EXP

202.10

Construction Materials Industry

Max
54.89
Q3
34.04
Median
7.92
Q1
4.28
Min
-6.24

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 202.10, EXP demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Construction Materials industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

MLM

16.36

Construction Materials Industry

Max
54.89
Q3
34.04
Median
7.92
Q1
4.28
Min
-6.24

MLM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 16.36 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Construction Materials industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

EXP vs. MLM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Construction Materials industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolEXPMLM
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.732.35
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.211.21
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.880.58
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)202.1016.36

Growth

Revenue Growth

EXP vs. MLM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

EXP vs. MLM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

EXP

0.44%

Construction Materials Industry

Max
5.91%
Q3
4.64%
Median
2.57%
Q1
1.11%
Min
0.00%

EXP’s Dividend Yield of 0.44% is in the lower quartile for the Construction Materials industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

MLM

0.52%

Construction Materials Industry

Max
5.91%
Q3
4.64%
Median
2.57%
Q1
1.11%
Min
0.00%

MLM’s Dividend Yield of 0.52% is in the lower quartile for the Construction Materials industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

EXP vs. MLM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Construction Materials industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

EXP

7.38%

Construction Materials Industry

Max
174.17%
Q3
91.80%
Median
44.42%
Q1
23.07%
Min
0.00%

EXP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 7.38% is in the lower quartile for the Construction Materials industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

MLM

17.62%

Construction Materials Industry

Max
174.17%
Q3
91.80%
Median
44.42%
Q1
23.07%
Min
0.00%

MLM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 17.62% is in the lower quartile for the Construction Materials industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

EXP vs. MLM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Construction Materials industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolEXPMLM
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.44%0.52%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)7.38%17.62%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

EXP

16.84

Construction Materials Industry

Max
49.05
Q3
24.51
Median
12.09
Q1
7.70
Min
4.06

EXP’s P/E Ratio of 16.84 is within the middle range for the Construction Materials industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MLM

33.80

Construction Materials Industry

Max
49.05
Q3
24.51
Median
12.09
Q1
7.70
Min
4.06

A P/E Ratio of 33.80 places MLM in the upper quartile for the Construction Materials industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

EXP vs. MLM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Construction Materials industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

EXP

3.34

Construction Materials Industry

Max
4.03
Q3
2.26
Median
1.31
Q1
0.66
Min
0.19

EXP’s P/S Ratio of 3.34 is in the upper echelon for the Construction Materials industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

MLM

5.57

Construction Materials Industry

Max
4.03
Q3
2.26
Median
1.31
Q1
0.66
Min
0.19

With a P/S Ratio of 5.57, MLM trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Construction Materials industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

EXP vs. MLM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Construction Materials industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

EXP

4.42

Construction Materials Industry

Max
3.19
Q3
1.80
Median
1.08
Q1
0.72
Min
0.11

At 4.42, EXP’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Construction Materials industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

MLM

3.53

Construction Materials Industry

Max
3.19
Q3
1.80
Median
1.08
Q1
0.72
Min
0.11

At 3.53, MLM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Construction Materials industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

EXP vs. MLM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Construction Materials industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolEXPMLM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)16.8433.80
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.345.57
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.423.53
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)24.2738.05