EXE vs. WDS: Expand Energy vs. Woodside Energy Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Expand Energy (EXE) and Woodside Energy (WDS) are both classified in the Oil & Gas Exploration & Production sub-industry within the broader Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

Woodside Energy (WDS) has more than two decades of public-market history since November 18, 1996, whereas Expand Energy (EXE) listed on February 10, 2021 and has a much shorter record to draw on.

Expand Energy (EXE) trades as ordinary local shares, while Woodside Energy (WDS) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Both Expand Energy (EXE) at 14.62% and Woodside Energy (WDS) at 7.68% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Both Expand Energy (EXE) at 21.26% and Woodside Energy (WDS) at 22.21% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

Both Expand Energy (EXE) at 23.18% and Woodside Energy (WDS) at 23.91% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Expand Energy (EXE) at 188.77% clears its industry range for revenue growth, far stronger top-line momentum than Woodside Energy (WDS) at -1.48%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.

Only one side can be read here: Woodside Energy (WDS) reports EPS growth of -24.02%, ranked against its industry; Expand Energy (EXE) has no EPS growth figure this period.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Both Expand Energy (EXE) at 0.90 and Woodside Energy (WDS) at 1.39 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.

Expand Energy (EXE) at 0.24 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Woodside Energy (WDS) at 0.33 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Woodside Energy (WDS) at 5.41% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Expand Energy (EXE) at 2.70% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, WDS the richer one.

Expand Energy (EXE) at 19.84% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Woodside Energy (WDS) at 69.78% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Expand Energy (EXE) at 7.30 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Woodside Energy (WDS) at 13.15 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for EXE, though growth and earnings durability still matter.

Expand Energy (EXE) at 1.51 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Woodside Energy (WDS) at 2.89 sits in the pricier quartile — WDS costs more per dollar of sales.

Expand Energy (EXE) at 1.00 sits in the lower P/B ratio quartile against book while Woodside Energy (WDS) at 1.11 is valued near its industry’s middle — EXE is cheaper on assets, though weigh it against ROE and asset quality.

Valuation Metrics