EXE vs. LNG: Expand Energy vs. Cheniere Energy Stock Comparison
How do Expand Energy (EXE) and Cheniere Energy (LNG) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Expand Energy (EXE) and Cheniere Energy (LNG) both belong to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, though EXE is classified under Oil & Gas Exploration & Production while LNG falls under Oil & Gas Storage & Transportation.
Cheniere Energy (LNG) has more than two decades of public-market history since April 4, 1994, whereas Expand Energy (EXE) listed on February 10, 2021 and has a much shorter record to draw on.
| Profile Item | EXE | LNG |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Expand Energy Corp | Cheniere Energy Inc. |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry Group | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Storage & Transportation |
| Market Capitalization | 19.54 billion USD | 56.76 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | Nasdaq | NYSE |
| Listing Date | February 10, 2021 | April 4, 1994 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | EXE | LNG |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | -22.30% | 36.89% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 4.93% | 19.36% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 9.88% | 22.59% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | EXE | LNG |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 29.72% | 31.41% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.40 | 0.06 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -30.37% | -24.87% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 3.10M | 2.00M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | EXE | LNG |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.89 | 1.04 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -1.27 | 1.54 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 39.68% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Expand Energy (EXE) at 14.62% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for LNG.
EXE
Energy industry group
14.62%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- EXE
- 14.62%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
LNG
Energy industry group
39.68%
- Max
- 53.85%
- LNG
- 39.68%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both Expand Energy (EXE) at 21.26% and Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 13.40% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
EXE
Energy industry group
21.26%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- EXE
- 21.26%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
LNG
Energy industry group
13.40%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- LNG
- 13.40%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Expand Energy (EXE) at 23.18% and Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 30.82% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
EXE
Energy industry group
23.18%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- EXE
- 23.18%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
LNG
Energy industry group
30.82%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- LNG
- 30.82%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | EXE | LNG |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 14.62% | 39.68% |
| ROA (TTM) | 8.17% | 8.61% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 21.26% | 13.40% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 23.18% | 30.82% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 45.86% | 34.89% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both companies are growing quickly, but Expand Energy (EXE) at 188.77% is the standout with revenue growth above its industry range; Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 27.21% also sits in the top quartile.
EPS Growth
Only one side can be read here: Cheniere Energy (LNG) reports EPS growth of 69.93%, ranked against its industry; Expand Energy (EXE) has no EPS growth figure this period.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | EXE | LNG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 188.77% | 27.21% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 2.13% | -15.77% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -- | 69.93% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -39.01% | 62.34% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Expand Energy (EXE) at 0.90 and Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 0.90 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.
EXE
Energy industry group
0.90
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- EXE
- 0.90
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
LNG
Energy industry group
0.90
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- LNG
- 0.90
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Expand Energy (EXE) at 0.24 keeps leverage in the lower quartile, while Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 2.31 is above its industry debt-to-equity ratio range.
EXE
Energy industry group
0.24
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- EXE
- 0.24
- Min
- 0.00
LNG
Energy industry group
2.31
- LNG
- 2.31
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | EXE | LNG |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 0.90 | 0.90 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.24 | 2.31 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.68 | 3.26 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Expand Energy (EXE) at 2.70% and Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 0.82% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
EXE
Energy industry group
2.70%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- EXE
- 2.70%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
LNG
Energy industry group
0.82%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- Median
- 1.71%
- LNG
- 0.82%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Expand Energy (EXE) at 19.84% and Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 15.80% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
EXE
Energy industry group
19.84%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- EXE
- 19.84%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
LNG
Energy industry group
15.80%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- LNG
- 15.80%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | EXE | LNG |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.70% | 0.82% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 19.84% | 15.80% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Expand Energy (EXE) at 7.30 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 19.78 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for EXE, though growth and earnings durability still matter.
EXE
Energy industry group
7.30
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- EXE
- 7.30
- Min
- 2.99
LNG
Energy industry group
19.78
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- LNG
- 19.78
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
P/S Ratio (TTM)
On P/S ratio, both Expand Energy (EXE) at 1.51 and Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 2.50 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.
EXE
Energy industry group
1.51
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- EXE
- 1.51
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
LNG
Energy industry group
2.50
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- LNG
- 2.50
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Expand Energy (EXE) at 1.00 sits in the lower P/B ratio quartile relative to book while Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 8.70 prices above its industry range — a wide valuation gap against assets.
EXE
Energy industry group
1.00
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- EXE
- 1.00
- Min
- 0.01
LNG
Energy industry group
8.70
- LNG
- 8.70
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | EXE | LNG |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 7.30 | 19.78 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 1.51 | 2.50 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 1.00 | 8.70 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 7.00% | 3.17% |