EXE vs. HAL: Expand Energy vs. Halliburton Stock Comparison
How do Expand Energy (EXE) and Halliburton (HAL) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Expand Energy (EXE) and Halliburton (HAL) both fall under the Energy industry group, but EXE is classified in Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels while HAL is classified in Energy Equipment & Services.
Halliburton (HAL) has more than two decades of public-market history since June 1, 1972, whereas Expand Energy (EXE) listed on February 10, 2021 and has a much shorter record to draw on.
| Profile Item | EXE | HAL |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Expand Energy Corp | Halliburton Company |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry Group | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | Energy Equipment & Services |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services |
| Market Capitalization | 19.54 billion USD | 26.34 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | Nasdaq | NYSE |
| Listing Date | February 10, 2021 | June 1, 1972 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | EXE | HAL |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | -22.30% | 18.66% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 4.93% | -3.16% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 9.88% | 7.11% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | EXE | HAL |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 29.72% | 33.27% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.40 | 0.77 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -30.37% | -54.01% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 3.10M | 10.27M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | EXE | HAL |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.89 | 0.43 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -1.27 | 0.64 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both Expand Energy (EXE) at 14.62% and Halliburton (HAL) at 18.78% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EXE
Energy industry group
14.62%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- EXE
- 14.62%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
HAL
Energy industry group
18.78%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- HAL
- 18.78%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both Expand Energy (EXE) at 21.26% and Halliburton (HAL) at 8.90% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
EXE
Energy industry group
21.26%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- EXE
- 21.26%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
HAL
Energy industry group
8.90%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- Median
- 10.10%
- HAL
- 8.90%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Expand Energy (EXE) at 23.18% and Halliburton (HAL) at 12.43% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
EXE
Energy industry group
23.18%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- EXE
- 23.18%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
HAL
Energy industry group
12.43%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- Median
- 18.73%
- HAL
- 12.43%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | EXE | HAL |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 14.62% | 18.78% |
| ROA (TTM) | 8.17% | 7.23% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 21.26% | 8.90% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 23.18% | 12.43% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 45.86% | 14.83% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Expand Energy (EXE) at 188.77% clears its industry range for revenue growth, far stronger top-line momentum than Halliburton (HAL) at -3.31%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.
EPS Growth
Only one side can be read here: Halliburton (HAL) reports EPS growth of -47.00%, ranked against its industry; Expand Energy (EXE) has no EPS growth figure this period.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | EXE | HAL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 188.77% | -3.31% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 2.13% | 3.01% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -- | -47.00% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -39.01% | -4.83% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Expand Energy (EXE) at 0.90 and Halliburton (HAL) at 2.02 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.
EXE
Energy industry group
0.90
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- EXE
- 0.90
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
HAL
Energy industry group
2.02
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- HAL
- 2.02
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Expand Energy (EXE) at 0.24 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Halliburton (HAL) at 0.73 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.
EXE
Energy industry group
0.24
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- EXE
- 0.24
- Min
- 0.00
HAL
Energy industry group
0.73
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- HAL
- 0.73
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | EXE | HAL |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 0.90 | 2.02 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.24 | 0.73 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.68 | 1.54 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Expand Energy (EXE) at 2.70% and Halliburton (HAL) at 2.13% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
EXE
Energy industry group
2.70%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- EXE
- 2.70%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
HAL
Energy industry group
2.13%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- HAL
- 2.13%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Expand Energy (EXE) at 19.84% and Halliburton (HAL) at 28.57% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
EXE
Energy industry group
19.84%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- EXE
- 19.84%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
HAL
Energy industry group
28.57%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- HAL
- 28.57%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | EXE | HAL |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.70% | 2.13% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 19.84% | 28.57% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Expand Energy (EXE) at 7.30 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Halliburton (HAL) at 13.38 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for EXE, though growth and earnings durability still matter.
EXE
Energy industry group
7.30
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- EXE
- 7.30
- Min
- 2.99
HAL
Energy industry group
13.38
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- HAL
- 13.38
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
P/S Ratio (TTM)
On P/S ratio, both Expand Energy (EXE) at 1.51 and Halliburton (HAL) at 1.17 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.
EXE
Energy industry group
1.51
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- EXE
- 1.51
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
HAL
Energy industry group
1.17
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- HAL
- 1.17
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Expand Energy (EXE) at 1.00 sits in the lower P/B ratio quartile against book while Halliburton (HAL) at 2.37 is valued near its industry’s middle — EXE is cheaper on assets, though weigh it against ROE and asset quality.
EXE
Energy industry group
1.00
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- EXE
- 1.00
- Min
- 0.01
HAL
Energy industry group
2.37
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- HAL
- 2.37
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | EXE | HAL |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 7.30 | 13.38 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 1.51 | 1.17 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 1.00 | 2.37 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 7.00% | 6.20% |